Running interference?



Premier Danny Williams speaks to reporters at Confederation Building in this May photo. The premier says Quebec has written a letter to Ottawa asking the federal government deny a request by this province and Nova Scotia to fund a subsea cable to ship po

Premier Danny Williams speaks to reporters at Confederation Building in this May photo. The premier says Quebec has written a letter to Ottawa asking the federal government deny a request by this province and Nova Scotia to fund a subsea cable to ship po

Published on August 13th, 2010
Published on August 13th, 2010
Dave Bartlett RSS Feed
The Telegram

Premier accuses Quebec of trying to block federal funding request

Premier Danny Williams says Quebec has written the federal government asking it not to grant a joint funding request from Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia.

Topics :
Public Private Partnerships , The Telegram , Conservative Party , Quebec , Nova Scotia , Maritime

According to Williams, this province and Nova Scotia filed an application with Ottawa in late June for funding under the Public Private Partnerships (P3) Fund to help pay for a proposed subsea, high-voltage cable which would link the two provinces.

The cable would be necessary if this province is able to develop the Lower Churchill hydroelectric project and opts for the Maritime transmission route as opposed to wheeling power through Quebec.

“We subsequently learned recently, within the last week or two, that the government of Quebec (has) actually sent, I think under Premier Jean Charest’s signature — although I haven’t seen the letter — a letter objecting to our funding (request),” Williams told The Telegram Thursday.

The premier called the actions of Quebec “disgusting.”

This isn’t the first time Williams has accused Quebec of trying to obstruct the Lower Churchill development.

In May, Williams let loose on that province in a scrum with reporters, after Quebec’s energy regulator decided not to grant Nalcor Energy’s request for capacity on the Quebec power grid.

That decision is being appealed.

“It’s one thing to be obstructionist in their own province and to try and block the regulatory process there,” he said.

“But then to turn around in a matter which really isn’t any business of theirs at all, which is the Maritime route, and try and block that? It just goes to show how predatory they are when it comes to competitors in the electricity market.”

Although the funding application was submitted by two provinces, Williams said the benefit of the cable — and the Lower Churchill in general — would be good news for up to six provinces, including Quebec, not only for the power it would generate, but for the jobs and raw materials that will be needed to build dams at Muskrat Falls and Gull Island.

“We subsequently learned recently, within the last week or two, that the government of Quebec (has) actually sent, I think under Premier Jean Charest’s signature — although I haven’t seen the letter — a letter objecting to our funding (request).” - Premier Danny Williams

Williams suggested that isn’t enough for Quebec.

“If it’s not for the benefit of Quebec, then nobody else is to have it. That’s the attitude of the premier of Quebec,” he said.

When asked how he found out about the Quebec letter, Williams said he “heard it through the grapevine” as well as through senior federal Conservative Party officials within this province.

“I wasn’t copied on the letter,” Williams said. “I didn’t even receive the courtesy of that.”

A federal Conservative source confirmed to The Telegram knowledge of the contents of the letter, although the source had not personally read it.

Williams said he has discussed the letter with Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter.

Dexter wasn’t available for an interview Thursday, but Nova Scotia Energy Minister Bill Estabrooks said he’s aware of the letter.

“Mr. Charest (should) mind (his) own business,” Estabrooks told The Telegram.

“He’s completely out of line

to dismiss a project that has been submitted to the federal government.”

Estabrooks said that’s especially the case considering the regional co-operation demonstrated by the project.

The Telegram called Charest’s office, but the call was not returned by deadline.

Williams didn’t know when the province would receive a response to its P3 funding request.

 

dbartlett@thetelegram.com

Comments

  • Username
    Danny Williams is cracked
    - August 21st, 2010 at 09:56:58

    He hasn't seen the letter either. Danny, ever hear of hearsay?? You Q.C. you.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    John Smith
    - August 20th, 2010 at 16:12:57

    I see the requisite Liberal hater is first off the mark today. I find it so amusing that eventhough 75-80% of NL thinks the priemier is doing a good job, we still have people like this hater putting forth their inane, imbecilic thoughts. Here we have a man, doing all in his power to help the people of this province, even with all the cards stacked against him, and yet we have people like this hater spewing hatered and lies. Hater, can't you and your fellow jealous haters put aside your petty differences, and see that the enemy is not Mr. Williams, it is the alliance between Ottawa, and Quebec. Did you ever wonder why Mr. Williams created the ABC campaign? Do you think he took the actions he did for a bit of fun? Don't you remember that it was Mr. Harper who promised, during the election, that there would be no clawback of the atlantic accord money? It ment billions of dollars to our province. Of, course if this had been Roger Grimes, or (God forbid) Yvonne Jones then they would have politely turned around, and bent over. However, it would not have ment a row of beans. It makes no difference who, or what we send to Ottawa. In the minds of these overlords there are no people living in this Province, just a few annoying colonies. In the minds of upper Canada we are like a little bank account that they can go to whenever they need a treaty signed, or to suck up to Quebec. At least with Mr. Williams we didn't bend over, we turned around and gave harper, and the rest of the overlords the collective middle finger. If anyone out there thinks for one solitary second that we have received one cent less from Ottawa because of who we sent to the House, you need to have your meds adjusted.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Shannon Reardon
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:59:43

    Quebec is against us getting federal money to compete with Hydro Quebec for US energy markets. If it was the other way around and we were in Quebec's shoes, don't doubt for a second that Williams wouldn't be doing the same thing. It makes sense where they are coming from, really, as "unfair" as it may be to us. This is typical anti-Quebec rhetoric from Williams to rally us all (not all of us) against the evil Quebec. Danny Williams has not been able to get this project off the ground, even after SECRET meetings with Hydro Quebec for YEARS to strike a deal with them. That failed last year, Danny Williams got sour and angry as per usual, and now all this ego-driven anti-Quebec nonsense. This is such a non-story.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    innocent bystander
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:59:13

    Have to agree with the second comment. Danny may have more than burned bridges with Harper's crowd and certainly with Quebec. Notwithstanding any injustices of the past, you can't continue to beat the same drum, hurl invective, chastise, berate and insult and then expect all to be forgiven. And yes, there is a tinge of hypocrisy too - Danny put his nose squarely in the NB - Quebec deal and even claimed some measure of credit when it fell apart. I may be naive, but some quiet backroom diplomacy is needed here to get Quebec and Newfoundland together on this. Wishful thinking? probably, but you can't keep slagging your neighbours and then expect them to play ball.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    William Daniels
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:58:24

    Ahhh. The fruits of ABC. What a great idea that was Danny.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Richard
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:57:11

    I think Phil Earle summed it up quite clearly. I certainly hope I'm alive when it comes time for Newfoundland & Labrador to actually hold the switch on the existing Churchill Falls power distribution. Quebec's politics has left Quebec looking like a large black hole on the Eastern side of Canada. Quebec,............THE TIME WILL COME !!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Don
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:56:55

    What is Danny Williams up to this time? Seeking Federal money for a sub-sea cable to transmit power from a hydro-electric project which doesn't even exist. The Lower Churchill project will cost $8 billion dollars to construct! If it ever gets built, it will be at least the year 2050 before the Lower Churchill is developed. It appears there must be some politically connected cronies who need a contract to lay this useless cable under the Cabot Strait where it will lie unused, subjected to ice damage and corrosion for the next 40 years. What absolute nonsense this is! Reality check people. What does Danny really need this Federal money for? Quebec is right to question and intervene against this crackpot scheme.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Robin Brentnall
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:55:35

    I sent a letter to Mr. Jean Charest, Premier of Quebec, asking him the following questions: Will Quebec allow NL to erect it's own power lines across Quebec to allow delivery to customers? Is Quebec really trying to block the power transfer? Would Quebec be interested in investing in the Lower Churchill Project? I will publish the answer when I get them here and on Openline and Backtalk.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    herry69
    - August 19th, 2010 at 12:55:13

    i have a better idea. give me a nuke.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    toronto bob
    - August 18th, 2010 at 12:41:43

    I support the efforts of NFLD in their efforts to get a bigger piece of the energy market but looking at the whole picture from a business point of view, the cost of developping the lower Churchill and the undersea cable just isn't viable. At the end of the day, you will compete against a giant A.K.A. hydro-quebec. Given the size of hydro-quebec and the volume of energy they own, they will always sell power to the USA at a lower price than NFLD could ever offer. NFLD getting in to the energy market against hydro-quebec is like opening a mom and pop hardware store right next to a Wall mart...you will never be competitive against them.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Mary Breen Kurilko
    - August 16th, 2010 at 09:45:54

    It would have been prudent for the Premier to keep a tight lip during the last federal election; however, he is still the best thing that ever happened to NL and Labrador, period!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Lance Macho
    - August 14th, 2010 at 11:35:45

    Folks, Why apply at all to the feds? That just gives them leverage. Take the new found oil wealth, plow it back into your own line, then be beholden to no one!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    chris
    - August 14th, 2010 at 11:31:11

    I know Danny has burned a bridge or two which is hurting us but if Harper was smart he would okay this idea and funding and at the same time pick up any valuable seats he lost in last election because as a minority government every seat counts. Harper isn't going to get anymore seats in Quebec because of the separatist no matter how many times he kisses their behind. If this goes through I think that they should build the line big enough to handle both upper and lower Churchill so in 2045 or so we can just cut the electricity to Quebec and send it down through NL and keep all profits for ourselves. I feel this is one of Quebec's fears and they are trying to stop this from happening as this is a cash cow for them

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    phil earle
    - August 13th, 2010 at 08:48:30

    Not to be audacious on this complex issue or so simplistic to think I could add something to all the work the premier and his staff have done on this file, I would like to make one comment on something that may be influencing Quebec’s behavior toward NL’s efforts toward development of the lower Churchill. If Danny ever reached an agreement with Quebec/Canada on the development and transmission of lower Churchill power using Quebec’s grid, the terms would never allow anything even close to what happened to us on the upper Churchill. I think should Quebec agree to such terms it would be a glaring embarrassment for them in the eyes of the Nation to see how unfairly they have treated NL on the Upper Churchill. Secondly, if such terms were signed by Quebec, it may influence, weaken, their position in the renegotiation of new terms with NL that will arise in 2041 when the present Upper Churchill agreement expires. Naturally they would like to go into those negotiations in a dominant position, which would be owning the only power grid out let for both Churchill's. I think in this light, therefore, it’s easy to see that Quebec also doesn’t want an ‘Atlantic power line’ as it would give NL a very strong position in 2041 renegotiating the Churchill power. At that time, should we have our own Atlantic route we could snub Quebec altogether and bring all the power, upper and lower, through Atlantic Canada. NL should make no mistake in over looking the wealth and power that will be produced by the green energy of the Churchill's after 2041. It will be worth multi billions a year by that time and should be a major factor in any negotiations we have at present. I would guess Quebec, and Canada, would like to see the lower Churchill developed in the same manner as the upper where they can usurp 95% of its economic benefit. Our dilemma in NL is, as it has always been in our confederation, that Canada will do what it can to leverage our provinces resources to outsiders, provinces of upper Canada or foreigners, for it’s own position and power. In this situation it happens to be Quebec and the bloc.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Danny Williams is cracked
    - August 13th, 2010 at 08:45:08

    Danny Williams expects funding from Steve, the same man he demonized in the 2008 federal election. You think Steve forgets THAT???!!! Danny, b'y, you are cracked. And you ran your interference in the Quebec-N.B. power deal. Hypocrite any?? Regardless of how potentially bad that deal was going to be, Danny Williams' words and behavior at the time were the greatest interference in it, all for his own interests. So, now he in a most duplicitous (and typical) way is chiding and vilifying Quebec for doing what he did in the past. Williams is desperate to get the Lower Churchill going for nothing more than his legacy. And I was enjoying the quiet summer...

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Jon M
      - August 20th, 2010 at 16:13:56

      For nothing more than his legacy? I wouldn't be so cynical there. I am not denying that he does want this to be part of his legacy, but to argue that this is the only reason he wants to get this project going is just wrong. There are many benefits (and not just for NL) to be gained from this project going ahead in both the short and long terms.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Telegram is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising