Remove payroll tax: employers

Deana Stokes Sullivan
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Council presenting submission to pre-budget consultations

Richard Alexander

The Newfoundland and Lab-rador Employers’ Council plans to ask the provincial government today to eliminate the health and post-secondary education payroll tax.

It’s not a new request, but this time the council says it has more evidence to back its plea, showing that its members would put the money they’d save to good use.

Executive director Richard Alexander says the council recently surveyed its members to find out what they would do with the money if the tax was eliminated.

“Fifty per cent of them said they would use the increased revenues from elimination of the tax to increase employment levels in their organizations and 40 per cent said they would increase salaries of existing employees if the tax were eliminated,” Alexander said Thursday.

This morning he was scheduled to make a presentation to the province’s pre-budget consultations in St. John’s, asking the provincial government to do away with the payroll tax altogether in its 2011 budget.

The payroll tax was implemented by the province in 1990. In January, 2008, the province agreed to increase the threshold for the two per cent payroll tax to $1 million from the previous $600,000.

 

Increased salaries

The employers’ council, in its recent survey, also asked members what they did with the money they saved from this change three years ago.

“The single biggest response that we received from members who were affected by the raising of the threshold was that 40 per cent of them said they increased salaries in their organizations,” Alexander said.

About 300 council members responded to the survey, but Alexander said some of those individual member companies are employers with 30 or more businesses all throughout the province.

“They employ greater than 50 per cent of all employees in the province,” Alexander said, “and I would suggest the vast majority pay the payroll tax.”

The employers’ council has contended for many years that when government taxes payrolls directly, it adversely impacts employment levels and salaries.

Alexander said federal government research and comments have supported that view, but the local findings from the provincial council’s survey presented an even stronger case than it originally expected.

One of the arguments against removing the payroll tax has been that the revenue would have to come from somewhere else, Alexander said, “but what the research at the national level shows and what our preliminary findings are suggesting is that’s not the case.”

The employers’ council argues that eliminating the payroll tax would increase revenues to the provincial government from personal income taxes because more people would be employed by local companies and many workers could receive higher wages. “They’re going to go out and spend more,” Alexander said, so government will collect more through personal income taxes, the harmonized sales tax (HST) and through corporate taxes arising from business expansions.

“We’re hoping the minister is going to look hard at this tax in this provincial budget,” Alexander said. “There’s a reason that every other province in Atlantic Canada has chosen not to tax payroll and that’s because it’s a counterproductive tax. It inhibits salaries, salary increases and it inhibits employment growth.”

Alexander said the payroll tax also impacts community services.

The employers council has been holding “tax on labour focus groups” around the province and Alexander said a community group in Labrador told the council it pays close to $30,000 in payroll tax, which if eliminated could be used for much needed community services.

“We’ve also heard from home-care agencies,” Alexander said. We have one home-care agency that’s below the threshold that doesn’t pay the tax and another one that’s over the threshold that does pay the tax.”

He said the agency that has to pay the payroll tax receives the same funding per client as the one that’s not taxed, which means it has to struggle to compete with the other agency.

“That’s the challenge with payroll tax,” Alexander said. “It taxes your total payroll and not your profit, so it makes no assumptions about the profitability of the business and sometimes the more people you employ doesn’t necessarily mean the more profit you get.”

dss@thetelegram.com

Organizations: Newfoundland and Lab

Geographic location: Atlantic Canada

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Embittered Employee
    January 28, 2011 - 12:21

    What the Gov't really NEEDS to do is focus on how the labour law is enforced and re-vamp the labour laws altogether! Employers expect you to not take a lunch break or even a scheduled break. You can't make overtime if you're already making more than $15/hour. If minimum wage is raised than employers expect that they don't have to raise you because the minimum wage went up... even if you're due for more than one raise! Full time employees not even so much as offered health bennefits. Working 28 days in a row at more and 50 hours a week.... I'm just going on my own experiences in the workforce that have embittered me over the years. On top of this I have found that in the interview/hiring process, prospective employees are LIED to as when they start the job, they find out that they have been FOOLED!

  • Murray
    January 28, 2011 - 12:18

    Wait a minute... isn't this the same lot who scream bloody murder at the very notion of a minimum wage or the right to unionize? Aren't they the ones who applaud Harper's proposed corporate tax cuts and contributions to the CPP? And where's WalMart in all this? I might be cynical, but somehow I don’t think that the public welfare is their primary concern.

  • greg davis
    January 28, 2011 - 09:08

    In bad times they dont want to pay taxes, in good times they dont want to pay taxes. They're like a skipping CD. Yet the very thought of paying their workers time and one half on overtime gives them a bad case of the vapours.Land pirates!

  • burden with taxes
    January 28, 2011 - 08:55

    Use the same arguement and do away with income tax.People would have more money to spend to buy goods and services,hence keeping business going and people employed.Gov would gain through sales tax.Business owners would give more money to their employees.HA! Now that's a good one.

  • Willi Makit
    January 28, 2011 - 07:44

    Many of the same businesses that the NL Employer's council are thriving due to government spending. If they don't want to contribute their fair share, I suggest they get off the taxpayer funded teat.