- Proud NovaScotian
- February 10, 2012 - 00:27
You have a great PUB. Ours is an embarrasement and acts like its members are Emera employees. As of this January, our residential power rate is now the highest in Atlantic Canada. Emera is easily the most hated corporation operating in Nova Scotia. A title well earned through never ending deceit, manipulation, and GREED. Promotions and hefty year end bonuses are not based on managerial or negotiating skill but on their ability to weasel. It truly hurts to think Newfoundlanders will soon be their next victims. Hard to fathom, but Hydro Quebec has more morals then "these trust me with a handshake" thugs. At least the Quebecois will stick to what's signed on paper. Don't believe me, ask any Newfoundlander residing in Nova Scotia. Good Luck!!
- John Smith
- February 09, 2012 - 12:19
Like Mr. Ball said himself..."that is our problem right now"... Last week it was some other misleading piece of innuendo, next week they will make up something else...it doesn't matter. There is plenty of info re. wind and gas on the Nalcor site, for those who want to read it. Wind is simply not a viable option without the connection to the mainland. You don't need to be an expert to see that. We cannot rely on wind as a main resource...it is not feasible on any level. Ms. Michael mentioned storing the wind power in tanks and using hydrogen ect. That is science fiction at this stage of the game...years away from reality. As well, LNG is not a viable option. Who will tell the oil companies who own the gas that now we want it, and they should build a multibillion dollar infrastructure for us so we can retrofit an aging plant in holyrood, and burn more fossil fuel, untill that's gone. Then what...build a dam? When it will cost 20 Million? Like I said, no report will ever satisfy those who are out to use this development for their own personal gain, be it the liberals, the ndp, or the media. I guess now we will have to pay for a new report to tell us again why wind and gas will not work, or be cost effective here. Then the liberals will tell us why it's no good, and the media will sell their papers ect. Sad, really sad.
- February 09, 2012 - 09:57
its pretty hard for dwight ball to answer any questions on muskrat falls,when the progressive conservitive government is so tight lipped aboutthe whold project.
- February 09, 2012 - 08:59
Why don’t they just tell us what we already know? Your current electric bill is based on a rate of about 10 cents per k/h. You’ve already been told that MF power will be at least 14 cents per k/h. Pull out your electric bill. You’re going to pay at least 40% more with MF than what you're paying today. Keep using Holyrood and you're at the mercy of bill oil and eventually you’ll probably end up paying as much or more than MF. Are there other options? We don't know because they’ve only looking at these two.
- February 09, 2012 - 07:36
The word is "lower cost" not "least cost" since only two alternatives were explored. Saying "least cost" implies more than two alternatives were explored, which is not true, and it only misleads the public. People should start using the proper description of lower cost. MF may indeed be the lower cost but not necessarily the least cost.
- February 09, 2012 - 07:33
I have to agree with you on this one...Dwight Ball couldn't answer a simple question,concerning this project...just like to hear himself talk ...
- February 09, 2012 - 07:33
yes you knows the citzens will pay for it , we havent got a choice to say no we dont want to pay for it , thats why they didnt answer the most direct question,,, rich gettin richer , one day the change will come marx
- February 09, 2012 - 07:06
None of the debaters answered a basic question: will citizen consumers of electrical power see their power bill double or triple to pay for this project? If this project will earn hundreds of millions of dollars in profit every year it is in operation (possibly a century) can't other ways to finance it be found? If this is a VIABLE project, why can't it finance itself? I was disappointed in the performance of all 3 of them. Dwight Ball was by far the most disappointing, asking ethereal questions and yammering on about no democratic debate on this project in the House. Michael Ignatieff called a general election because Harper was found in contempt of parliament and the country gave Harper a mojority (God help us) and showed Ignatieff the door. People don't care about spouting politicians on an issue like this; they care about their wallet and what is being taken from it.
- February 09, 2012 - 09:00
What's a "mojority"? Obviously you cannot articulate.
- Spelling Bee
- February 09, 2012 - 09:29
Probably a typo, Jeff. Valid questions though. Perhaps Jeff can answer the questions because the politicians have not?