For oil in the Gulf, all the neighbours want a say

Ashley Fitzpatrick
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Coalition representatives visit St. John’s to emphasize geographical interconnection

Jean-Patrick Toussaint of the David Suzuki Foundation speaks about the opening up of the Gulf of St. Lawrence to oil and gas development. Toussaint and other visiting members of the St. Lawrence Coalition opened the subject to discussion following a presentation at Memorial University of Newfoundland’s St. John’s campus. — Photo by Ashley Fitzpatrick/The Telegram

It’s a fair question. Even if Newfoundland and Labrador is willing to take on the risks associated with drilling for oil and gas in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, is it fair to place that risk on our geographical neighbours?

About 30 people attended an evening in-formation and discussion session on the subject of development in the

Gulf at Memorial University of Newfoundland’s St. John’s campus Thursday night.

The event featured a presentation by  the members of the St. Lawrence Coalition — an organization formed in 2010 at the forefront of a developing debate over whether or not to allow development in the Gulf.

Distance is a main point they make. In the case of the Old Harry prospect site, according to the group, drilling would take place about 300 kilometres from the Gaspé, 210 km from Prince Edward Island, 120 km from Cape Breton, 80 km from the Magdalen Islands and approximately 70 km from the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Compare this with the 315-350 km or more to reach the oilfields currently producing offshore Newfoundland and Labrador.

Because of this, the coalition — now claiming more than 80 member organizations, with over 3,500 individual members — is calling for a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf until a large-scale, truly regional consultation can take place. According to the group, sites for public meetings within the consultation process should include areas within Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Quebec.

Presenters at the session in St. John’s included Jean-Patrick Toussaint of the David Suzuki Foundation, Danielle Giroux of Attention Fragile and Sylvain Archambault of CPAWS Quebec.

Past-president of Nature NL and a faculty member at MUN, Len Zedel, was also on hand to assist in the presentation, providing a basic overview of Gulf oceanography.

The team ran through the potential impact of a Gulf oil spill on fishing, aquaculture and tourism. It noted at-risk and endangered species. It highlighted the 13 species of whales found in the Gulf, the 120 Atlantic salmon rivers. There are some of the world’s largest gannet colonies, the team pointed out, with those birds known to criss-cross the Gulf.

The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board is beginning work to update its own regional environmental assessment of the area offshore in western Newfoundland, looking at many of the same considerations.

According to the coalition, this work should be broader.

The David Suzuki Foundation has developed maps of what might happen in the event of an oil spill at the Old Harry site. Thee maps do not take response efforts into consideration, yet suggest a spill at Old Harry could see oil reaching to the Maritimes.

On the proposed moratorium, Giroux said, “It’s not a ‘no’ to the industry. It’s an open position to see how can we act with precaution.”

Despite the presenters encouraging open conversation on the pros and cons of oil and gas developments, it was clear there was no love lost among the group for Halifax-based Corridor Resources — the company that has proposed on more than one occasion to drill into the Old Harry prospect to test for its potential as an oil and gas producer.

“They have no experience at all in the offshore,” Archambault said of the company.

Collectively, the coalition is calling for the moratorium to provide more time for authorities to evaluate potential impacts of a spill off western Newfoundland, establish integrated management of the Gulf, revise the legal and technical norms for greater protection and allow residents to make an informed, collective choice as to whether any development should happen at all.

The visiting coalition members have also held sessions in Corner Brook and Stephenville. More information on the organization can be found at:

Organizations: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Lawrence Coalition, David Suzuki Foundation Gulf.The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board Corridor Resources

Geographic location: Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Cape Breton Magdalen Islands Nova Scotia New Brunswick Atlantic Corner Brook Stephenville

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Melanie Gauthier
    April 23, 2012 - 00:11

    I totally agree with Mary Gorman's comment above. Why would we, residents and people who own properties on the shores of the Gulf of St- Lawrence, be IMPOSED the risks of the most dangerous, risky and poluting industry in the world, just so oil companies can make profits? I grew up surrounded by the beauty of the Gulf and its beaches, its ecosystem, its fisheries, its renewable industries, the sea birds, the whales, sea kayaking, sailing, windsurfing, swimming in its clear bontyful waters. The Gulf gives, gives, gives abundantly, profusely, it feeds us, it bathes us, it protects us. Would YOU want to put your own front lawn at risk, your whole life, your livelihood, your Estate, your legacy, everything you love dearly, to feed hungry and greedy giants whose thurst will never be clenched? We know how destructive fossel fuel energies are. We know we have reached peak oil. We know alternatives like the electric cars, cars that run with water alone (distributed commercially in Japan right now), solar energy, wind energy, geothermy, proper building and insolation, and I could keep going for a while. So WHY, WHY would we ever be insane enough to allow something like this to take place here? in a closed pool of water, six times smaller than the Gulf of Mexico, where crazy currents and storms are a common thing and where the water freezes in the winter? Think. One second. There, you will clearly see the answer.

  • Mary Gorman
    April 20, 2012 - 11:50

    Perhaps the maps presented by the Coalition do not take response efforts into consideration because the Gulf of St. Lawrence is the second windiest region in North America. Due to its windy nature, realistically, I cannot see how 'boom', be it six inch or higher, could clean up a spill in our Gulf. I live in a coastal community in Nova Scotia on the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence and have profound concerns about this development because I know firsthand how rarely the water is 'calm'. Our Gulf has counterclockwise currents and as an inland sea, its waters only exchange with the Atlantic once a year. If response efforts are not successful, due to our strong tides within the Gulf, oil might be splashing on the shorelines of half of the provinces in this country over the course of a year. Ice cover is also a great worry. How does one clean up a spill under ice? Finally, apart from the pristine splendour and rapturous beauty of Canada's Gulf of St. Lawrence, my husband and I would like to leave something for our children. We have worked very hard all our lives, always pay our taxes and like many canadians, most of our financial 'worth' is invested in our property. We don't want our property to become worthless because of oil on our shores. I hope the Canada Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board will broaden their public consultation process so that coastal landowners throughout our Gulf may also engage in this vital conversation.