Agrees to other changes to end antitrust probe
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chairman Jon Leibowitz speaks during a news conference at FTC in Washington Thursday. ‚ÄĒ Photo by The Associated Press
Google has settled a U.S. government probe into its business practices without making any major concessions on how the company runs its Internet search engine, the world‚Äôs most influential gateway to digital information and commerce.
Thursday‚Äôs agreement with the Federal Trade Commission covers only some of the issues raised in a wide-ranging antitrust investigation that could have culminated in a regulatory crackdown that re-shapes Internet search, advertising and mobile computing.
But that didn‚Äôt happen, to the relief of Google and technology trade groups worried about overzealous regulation discouraging future innovation. The resolution disappointed consumer rights groups and Google rivals such as Microsoft Corp., which had lodged complaints with regulators in hopes of legal action that would split up or at least hobble the Internet‚Äôs most powerful company.
Google is still trying to settle a similar antitrust probe in Europe. A resolution to that case is expected to come within the next few weeks.
After a 19-month investigation, Google Inc. placated the FTC by signing a consent decree requiring the company to charge ‚Äúfair, reasonable and non-discriminatory‚ÄĚ prices to license hundreds of patents deemed essential to the operations of mobile phones, tablet computers, laptops and video game consoles.
The requirement is meant to ensure that Google doesn‚Äôt use patents acquired in last year‚Äôs $12.4-billion purchase of Motorola Mobility to thwart competition from mobile devices running on software other than Google‚Äôs Android system. The products vying against Android include Apple Inc.‚Äôs iPhone and iPad, Research in Motion Ltd.‚Äôs BlackBerry and Microsoft‚Äôs Windows software.
Google also promised to exclude, upon request, snippets copied from other websites in capsules of key information shown in response to search requests. The company had insisted the practice is legal under the fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Nonetheless, even before the settlement, Google already had scaled back on the amount of cribbing, or ‚Äúscraping,‚ÄĚ of online content after business review site Yelp Inc. lodged one of the complaints that triggered the FTC investigation in 2011.
In another concession, Google pledged to adjust the online advertising system that generates most of its revenue so marketing campaigns can be more easily managed on rival networks.
Google, though, prevailed in the pivotal part of the investigation, which delved into complaints that the Internet search leader has been highlighting its own services on its influential results page while burying links to competing sites. For instance, requests for directions may turn up Google Maps first, queries for video might point to the company‚Äôs own site, YouTube, and searches for merchandise might route users to Google Shopping.
Although the FTC said it uncovered some obvious instances of bias in Google‚Äôs results during the investigation, the agency‚Äôs five commissioners unanimously concluded there wasn‚Äôt enough evidence to take legal action.
‚ÄúUndoubtedly, Google took aggressive actions to gain advantage over rival search providers,‚ÄĚ said Beth Wilkinson, a former federal prosecutor the FTC hired to help steer the investigation. ‚ÄúHowever, the FTC‚Äôs mission is to protect competition, and not individual competitors.‚ÄĚ
Two consumer rights groups lashed out at the FTC for letting Google off too easily.
‚ÄúThe FTC had a long list of grievances against Google to choose from when deciding if they unfairly used their dominance to crush their competitors, yet they failed to use their authority for the betterment of the marketplace,‚ÄĚ said Steve Pociask, president of the American Consumer Institute.
John Simpson of frequent Google critic Consumer Watchdog asserted, ‚ÄúThe FTC rolled over for Google.‚ÄĚ
Not surprisingly, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz didn‚Äôt see it that way. He argued the outcome ‚Äúis good for consumers. It is good for competition. It is good for innovation and it is the right thing to do.‚ÄĚ Before reaching its conclusion, the FTC reviewed more than nine million pages of documents submitted by Google and its rivals and grilled top Internet industry executives during sworn depositions.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a technology trade group, applauded the FTC for its handling of the high-profile case.
‚ÄúThis was a prudent decision by the FTC that shows that antitrust enforcement, in the hands of responsible regulators, is sufficiently adaptable to the realities of the Internet age,‚ÄĚ said Ed Black, the group‚Äôs president.
The FTC has previously been criticized for not doing more to curb Google‚Äôs power. Most notably, the FTC signed off on Google‚Äôs $3.2-billion purchase of online advertising service DoubleClick in 2008 and its $681-million acquisition of mobile ad service AdMob in 2010. Google critics contend those deals gave the company too much control over the pricing of digital ads, which account for the bulk of Google‚Äôs revenue.
AP Technology Writer Barbara Ortutay
in New York contributed to this story.