Federal legislation will end fees for getting paper bills: minister

The Canadian Press
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

The big telecom companies may have agreed to exempt some customers from fees charged for paper invoices, but the federal government says it’s going to end the whole practice.

Industry Minister James Moore says the government will introduce legislation to end what is called pay-to-pay, the practice of charging people extra for a monthly bill on paper.

“We do not believe that Canadians should pay more to receive a paper copy of their telephone or wireless bill,” Moore said in a statement Friday.

The telecom firms met under the auspices of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunication Commission on Thursday and agreed to exempt some people, including seniors, the disabled, military vets and people without Internet access.

The CRTC said it wasn’t enough and called for another round of discussions, but that seems to have been overtaken by Moore’s announcement.

The minister says the practice of charging extra for paper invoices is unfair.

Moore says Canadians expect lower prices and better service from the telecoms.

“That is why our government committed to ending this unfair practice and putting the interests of Canadian consumers first,” he said.

The Thursday meeting included telecom giants Bell, Rogers and Telus.

Billing practices and fees are a patchwork in the industry.

Cogeco, which supplies cable, Internet and phone service in Ontario and Quebec, has never adopted the practice, although it does encourage customers to go paperless.

MTS Allstream, SaskTel and Shaw Communications, also don’t charge extra for paper invoices.

Other companies, however, do charge for paper bills — up to $6 per month in some cases, plus tax — and both the fees and exemption policies vary widely.

Rogers, for instance, has been known to waive its $2 fee if customers object for various reasons.

The Public Interest Advocacy Centre has estimated consumers pay $734 million every year in fees to get bills on paper.

And that’s the motivation for the telecom giants to keep the fees in place for as long as possible, said NDP critic Andrew Cash.

“It’s a cash cow that just keeps on giving, until the government comes in and puts in some strong legislation that bans the practice altogether,” he said.

“And that’s what we’ve been calling for.”

Cash said he would await the details contained in the legislation before saying whether he would support it, but called the announcement by Moore a positive step.

 

By Terry Pedwell

THE CANADIAN PRESS—OTTAWA

Organizations: Canadian Radio, Telecommunication Commission, CRTC Bell Cogeco SaskTel and Shaw Communications Public Interest Advocacy Centre Terry PedwellTHE CANADIAN PRESS

Geographic location: Ontario, Quebec, OTTAWA

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Ian Shaw
    August 31, 2014 - 09:30

    The entire machinery of government grinding away and after 8 years, this is what they come up with?

  • Geoffrey Laxton
    August 31, 2014 - 02:56

    The Harper Government is just trying to cover themselves for the fact that they insist on paper bills as voter identification to show address.

  • jim
    August 30, 2014 - 22:53

    Now it's time to go after banks,who charge 2 dollars per transaction at ATM machines. There greed is out of control.

  • Grannymosses
    August 30, 2014 - 20:35

    If they can't charge that billing fee, they will just dream up some other kind of charge and we will all end up paying more anyway. Just look at how Hydro One invented all their little surcharges when the government capped kwr rates.

  • paul
    August 30, 2014 - 18:42

    It's about time the pay to pay situation is brought to an end. As well, it would be nice if the overall fees charged for wireless and home phone, cable, internet.

  • alaleb
    August 30, 2014 - 18:09

    I want my money back ....

  • nan
    August 30, 2014 - 17:39

    I can see legislating the informed consent part, but people can enter into this sort of contract if they want to. The flip side is that I don't get any paper bills and don't want to pay for other people's mail as a bundled cost, let alone a legislated one. Either way if you don't want to pay for it, just tell them no thanks - they're not going to say goodbye to your monthly payment for a few more bucks, and will happily waive the cost. You'll probably have to speak to the "retention" rep, but you can magically summon them on any call to any telco with the phrase "cancel my service".