City in Net tax dispute

Deana Stokes Sullivan
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

St. John's seeking legislation amendment

When it comes to taxation, one figure in the City of St. John's budget projections for 2010 stands out as an anomaly.
Residential, business and water taxes are all expected to bring in more revenue to the city next year, but its 2010 budget projections contains a line under the utility tax category showing a decrease in revenue of $1.2 million. The budgeted amount for 2009 was $6.7 million, but the target for 2010 is a lower $5.5 million.
Bob Bishop, the city's director of finance, explains the projected loss as arising from a dispute with "a major utility company" over the interpretation of the province's Taxation of Utilities and Cable Television Companies Act.
Bishop said utilities normally pay annual taxes based on their revenues for the previous year. The tax rate set by the province is 2.5 per cent of the utilities' gross revenues derived within each municipality.
In 2009, Bishop said, when one utility company paid its taxes to the city, it sent in a smaller amount without any explanation.
"After an awful lot of back and forth, we eventually discovered that they had reviewed the act and had determined, or at least their interpretation was, that the act didn't cover the provision of Internet services," Bishop said. "We're disputing that, but in the interim we have submitted a request to the provincial government for clarification within the act. In the meantime, we have to budget on a conservative basis."
Bishop wouldn't say which utility company has challenged the city on this issue.
However, he said, the city has contacted the Department of Municipal Affairs and has requested that the act be amended.
Other than an initial acknowledgment that the department is looking into the matter, Bishop said he hasn't heard anything further from the province.
He said there have been changes made to the act over the years to take into account the provision of satellite television services and cellphones, so this is not unprecedented.
The legislation was likely enforced before Internet services were available, he said.
"At that time, the Internet was probably only a gleam in Al Gore's eye," he joked.
Bishop said it's his understanding other municipalities throughout the province are in the same situation.
He said the issue also affects the provincial government because in unincorporated areas, the province collects the utility tax on its own behalf.
A spokesperson for the Department of Municipal Affairs confirmed the department has received representation from the city regarding concerns about the taxation of utilities and has requested that consideration be given to making an amendment to legislation.
"This is not a simple matter and any changes to legislation would have implications provincewide. In the interest of good public policy, we will review the issue and the legislation currently in place," the spokesperson said.
The provincial legislation currently defines a utility as:
‰ A person, firm or corporation that owns, operates, manages or controls in the province a cable television broadcast receiving undertaking with equipment and facilities for receiving and redistributing television programming and non-programming services, for consideration paid by the user or consumer of those services;
‰ The Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro Electric Corp., a corporation continued under the Hydro Corporation Act and its "successors and assigns;"
‰ The Twin Falls Power Corp. and its "successors and assigns;"
‰ The Newfoundland Light and Power Co. Ltd., a corporation continued under the Corporations Act and its successors and assigns;
‰ A person, firm or corporation involved in the transmission, conveyance, communication, delivery or provision of telephone, telegraph and facsimile messages.

dss@thetelegram.com

Organizations: Department of Municipal Affairs, Utilities and Cable Television Companies, The Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro Electric Hydro Corporation The Twin Falls Power The Newfoundland Light and Power Co.

Geographic location: St. John's

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Keith
    July 02, 2010 - 13:25

    Poor St. John's. All we hear about is how they don't have money for this and that. They put bandaids in the potholes instead of repairing it the proper way.Now they are not salting the roads properly. It's all about the money instead of the safety of motorists. Snowclearing is nowhere near what it should be. You hear the mayor on thr radio or tv complaining about how overbudget they are with snowclearing. I can't see how they go over budget when the streets are being clear well at all so that is what confuses me. The trucks must be sitting idle somewhere cause during a storm or the day after there isn't one to be seen anywhere.

    Here in Mount Pearl we have great snowclearing and lots of salt and never hear our mayor on the radio complaining about being over budget. Safety is more important to our council.

    Mayor O'keefe said that Mount Pearl should amalgamate with St. John's. Do he think we would be silly enough to give up the great sevices we have now compared to what St John's got. He is in a dream world if he thinks he can get us un the POOR St John's banner. Mayor O'keefe should concentrate his own city and let Mount Pearl keep up the great work they are doing here.

    So Mayor O'keefe can forget about the amalgamation thing cause it ain't going to happen. We know the difference in the services of the 2 cities and we would be all crazy to say yes to amalgamation.

    Stop wasting time and money(that St John's don't have) on this topic and continue to have a poorly run city there and we will continue to live in our happy city here.

  • Refuse
    July 02, 2010 - 13:25

    Sorry St. Johns. My wages went down this past year due to cut backs. Services from the City have fallen off as well. Looks like either the City will need to lower wages, lower staff levels or increase fees on private cruise ships to make up the difference. Maybe a few less expenditures will help you out. The taxpayers can not, nor will not be able to keep you all in comfort if we are in line at the food bank to save the cash to pay increased taxes over eating.

    You have yourself a Merry Little Christmas, and turn out the lights we pay for them and it costs too much.

  • Esron
    July 02, 2010 - 13:24

    Haha, Major Utility Company . I am willing to bet that the company utility company is BellAliant.

  • Eugene
    July 02, 2010 - 13:16

    Well, I guess any shortfall from business/utility revenue will be made up by residential tax hikes. Heard on a local radio show this a.m., Councillor Debbie Hanlon insinuated that taxpayers, who believe that prospective council members during the fall election promised mil rate decreases, were delusional. All expenses, said councillor Hanlon, increase yearly. Except for those associated with providing internet service, apparently.

  • Keith
    July 01, 2010 - 20:11

    Poor St. John's. All we hear about is how they don't have money for this and that. They put bandaids in the potholes instead of repairing it the proper way.Now they are not salting the roads properly. It's all about the money instead of the safety of motorists. Snowclearing is nowhere near what it should be. You hear the mayor on thr radio or tv complaining about how overbudget they are with snowclearing. I can't see how they go over budget when the streets are being clear well at all so that is what confuses me. The trucks must be sitting idle somewhere cause during a storm or the day after there isn't one to be seen anywhere.

    Here in Mount Pearl we have great snowclearing and lots of salt and never hear our mayor on the radio complaining about being over budget. Safety is more important to our council.

    Mayor O'keefe said that Mount Pearl should amalgamate with St. John's. Do he think we would be silly enough to give up the great sevices we have now compared to what St John's got. He is in a dream world if he thinks he can get us un the POOR St John's banner. Mayor O'keefe should concentrate his own city and let Mount Pearl keep up the great work they are doing here.

    So Mayor O'keefe can forget about the amalgamation thing cause it ain't going to happen. We know the difference in the services of the 2 cities and we would be all crazy to say yes to amalgamation.

    Stop wasting time and money(that St John's don't have) on this topic and continue to have a poorly run city there and we will continue to live in our happy city here.

  • Refuse
    July 01, 2010 - 20:11

    Sorry St. Johns. My wages went down this past year due to cut backs. Services from the City have fallen off as well. Looks like either the City will need to lower wages, lower staff levels or increase fees on private cruise ships to make up the difference. Maybe a few less expenditures will help you out. The taxpayers can not, nor will not be able to keep you all in comfort if we are in line at the food bank to save the cash to pay increased taxes over eating.

    You have yourself a Merry Little Christmas, and turn out the lights we pay for them and it costs too much.

  • Esron
    July 01, 2010 - 20:09

    Haha, Major Utility Company . I am willing to bet that the company utility company is BellAliant.

  • Eugene
    July 01, 2010 - 19:56

    Well, I guess any shortfall from business/utility revenue will be made up by residential tax hikes. Heard on a local radio show this a.m., Councillor Debbie Hanlon insinuated that taxpayers, who believe that prospective council members during the fall election promised mil rate decreases, were delusional. All expenses, said councillor Hanlon, increase yearly. Except for those associated with providing internet service, apparently.