Catholic schools must teach same curriculum: McGuinty

The Canadian Press ~ The News
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Education/Health

Ontario's Catholic schools will have to teach sex education like any other public school, despite reports that bureaucrats were willing to let Catholics develop their own watered-down version of the controversial curriculum, Premier Dalton McGuinty insisted Wednesday.

"I don't distinguish between two school systems when it comes to our curriculum," he said, almost a week after shelving the explosive sex ed program that was to include lessons on masturbation and anal sex.

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty

Toronto -

Ontario's Catholic schools will have to teach sex education like any other public school, despite reports that bureaucrats were willing to let Catholics develop their own watered-down version of the controversial curriculum, Premier Dalton McGuinty insisted Wednesday.

"I don't distinguish between two school systems when it comes to our curriculum," he said, almost a week after shelving the explosive sex ed program that was to include lessons on masturbation and anal sex.

"God love them, but we have a single curriculum when it comes to mathematics, when it comes to history, when it comes to world studies and when it comes to sexual education, and we'll find a way so that it suits all our children."

But some Catholic groups tell a different story. They say officials were drafting their own version of the curriculum - with the full knowledge of the Education Ministry - that would have deviated significantly from the one the province developed.

For example, homosexuality wouldn't be taught in separate schools until grades 7 and 8, instead of Grade 3.

Education Minister Leona Dombrowsky muddied the waters further Wednesday when asked whether publicly funded Catholic schools could cherry-pick from the provincial curriculum.

Catholic schools have a "denominational right" to determine how the information is provided to their students, said Dombrowsky, a former Catholic school board trustee.

"(Students) may not learn the same way," she said. "They learn the same thing perhaps in a different way."

Asked if that left the door open to teaching Catholic students that masturbation and homosexuality is wrong or sinful, the minister clammed up.

"I'm not going to speculate on what might be in the curriculum," Dombrowsky said. "That's the exercise that's underway right now."

The minister's staff later clarified that the curriculum only dictates what schools should teach, not how they teach it. That's left up to the teacher.

Catholic teachers are expected to meet the requirements of the curriculum, but approach it in a way that's in keeping with their faith. Catholic officials and bishops already oversee a program called Fully Alive that provides guidance on how the curriculum is provided, they said.

Outrage over the controversial sex ed lessons grew so loud McGuinty abruptly dropped the program last Thursday, even as his ministers were still defending it in the legislature.

Neither the premier nor the Education Ministry usually signs off on revisions to the curriculum, but McGuinty said he should have realized that sex ed is a "horse of a different colour."

"This is a very sensitive issue and I think we failed to do our job," said the Catholic premier. "So what we're going to do is take the time to do it right."

McGuinty said revisions were needed to a curriculum that hadn't been touched in a dozen years, but repeatedly refused to disclose what he thought about the sex ed changes.

He said he hadn't even seen the changes when he passionately defended them last week, and only read the passages about sex ed just before he pulled the plug. He still hasn't read the entire 206-page curriculum.

The scrapped changes included teaching Grade 1 kids to identify genitalia using terms like penis and vagina and introducing the concept of same-sex families in Grade 3. Parents, as well as conservative and religious groups, also balked at proposed lessons on masturbation, anal and oral sex and vaginal lubrication.

The controversy became a public relations nightmare for the governing Liberals and particularly McGuinty, the self-described education premier who vilified the Conservatives in 2007 over their disastrous election promise to fund religious schools.

Organizations: Education Ministry, Catholic school board, Conservatives

Geographic location: Toronto, Ontario

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • M
    July 02, 2010 - 13:34

    I find this 'outrage' ridiculous.
    There is nothing wrong with teaching children how to identify genitalia. In the world we live in, if children are referring to it as 'penis' and 'vagina' instead of some of the colorful alternatives, I think that's good. Also, Penis and vagina are the names of these body parts. It's like teaching them arm, leg, toe, etc. The only reason people have a problem with it is because everyone thinks 'sex' and sexual behavior is somehow dirty.
    Listen, In the world we live in today, children are exposed to sexual behavior much younger than when we were children. I don't agree that they should be taught about oral sex at grade 3, but everything else that was proposed is not bad. There are thousands of same sex families these days and kids are exposed to it. If a child in grade 3 becomes friends with another child in grade 3, and the second child comes from a same sex family, wouldn't it be better for the first child to be aware of what that is so tolerance and acceptance of 'different' life choices can be formed at a younger age instead of intolerance and judgement. Of course it should.

    Movies, tv, video games, books..everything contains sex these days...wouldn't you rather your child learn what it is from an educator who can present it in a way that it comes off as factual, rather than your child play grand theft auto which depicts prostitution and violence related to it?

    This new sex ed program is a great idea. If people were more well educated in the area of sex, there would be less teen pregnancies, less STDs in teenagers, and a higher awareness of what is right and what is wrong.

  • M
    July 01, 2010 - 20:24

    I find this 'outrage' ridiculous.
    There is nothing wrong with teaching children how to identify genitalia. In the world we live in, if children are referring to it as 'penis' and 'vagina' instead of some of the colorful alternatives, I think that's good. Also, Penis and vagina are the names of these body parts. It's like teaching them arm, leg, toe, etc. The only reason people have a problem with it is because everyone thinks 'sex' and sexual behavior is somehow dirty.
    Listen, In the world we live in today, children are exposed to sexual behavior much younger than when we were children. I don't agree that they should be taught about oral sex at grade 3, but everything else that was proposed is not bad. There are thousands of same sex families these days and kids are exposed to it. If a child in grade 3 becomes friends with another child in grade 3, and the second child comes from a same sex family, wouldn't it be better for the first child to be aware of what that is so tolerance and acceptance of 'different' life choices can be formed at a younger age instead of intolerance and judgement. Of course it should.

    Movies, tv, video games, books..everything contains sex these days...wouldn't you rather your child learn what it is from an educator who can present it in a way that it comes off as factual, rather than your child play grand theft auto which depicts prostitution and violence related to it?

    This new sex ed program is a great idea. If people were more well educated in the area of sex, there would be less teen pregnancies, less STDs in teenagers, and a higher awareness of what is right and what is wrong.