• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (8)
  •  

Refinery must defend U.S. suit

Published on May 17, 2010
Published on July 1, 2010
Steve Bartlett  RSS Feed

Previous owner has indemnified North Atlantic in case

A panel of judges in New Hampshire has decided North Atlantic Refining must defend itself in that state's Supreme Court against allegations it sold gas that contaminated ground and surface waters.

The State of New Hampshire filed a lawsuit against refiners and manufacturers that allegedly supplied gas containing a compound commonly called MTBE.

Topics :
Vitol , Supreme Court , Harvest Energy Trust , New Hampshire , North Atlantic , U.S.

Court -

A panel of judges in New Hampshire has decided North Atlantic Refining must defend itself in that state's Supreme Court against allegations it sold gas that contaminated ground and surface waters.

The State of New Hampshire filed a lawsuit against refiners and manufacturers that allegedly supplied gas containing a compound commonly called MTBE.

That stands for methyl tertiary butyl ether, which is said to boost octane levels and produce a cleaner burning fuel.

It alleges the substance escaped into and contaminated groundwater when it was sold in the state between 1995 and 2006.

New Hampshire banned the additive in 2007.

North Atlantic, which operates the refinery in Come By Chance, was one of the refiners named in the case.

It was owned by the Vitol group of companies when the majority of the alleged offences occurred.

The case facts say the Come By Chance operation manufactured gas containing MTBE for sister Vitol companies between 1995 and 2006.

The states believes North Atlantic delivered the product to Vitol in New Hampshire and was involved in promoting it, even though the company knew its product would pollute ground and surface waters.

North Atlantic moved to dismiss New Hampshire's complaint in 2007, arguing the state had no jurisdiction over it.

A discovery was heard in 2008 and, in July 2009, the refinery's notion was dismissed after the trial court thought the state had justified the suit and its jurisdiction over North Atlantic.

The refinery appealed that decision and the three-judge panel turned it down May 7.

In their deliberations, the judges concluded the state's legal action relates to the shipments produced in Come By Chance and shipped to New Hampshire.

They said North Atlantic availed of the protection of the state's laws and, as the exporter of record for shipments of MTBE gasoline to Vitol, the company was an integral part of the distribution system.

The panel also deemed it was fair to require the refinery to defend the suit.

North Atlantic was sold to Harvest Energy Trust in October 2006.

Harvest was taken over by the Korean National Oil Corporation late last year.

A spokeswoman with North Atlantic said the company does not discuss ongoing litigation, but also noted "our former owner has indemnified us" against the New Hampshire claim.

sbartlett@thetelegram.com

Comments

  • Username
    Billy
    - July 2, 2010 at 15:00:03

    Hi, Jack.

    Look up indemnify .

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    jim
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:47:14

    Jack, you are soooooo smart.
    I bet they never heard of the term vicarious libility. maybe you should phone them and tell them all about it.
    Those bumb lawyers down in the U.S sure could use a man like you working for them. You super smart person you.

    I only wish more rhodes scholars like you would contribute to this web site, or evern run for politics.

    You TOOL

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:46:44

    Jim from NL, I'm not a Rhodes Scholar, but I did take Commercial Law courses as part of my Bachelor of Commerce studies at Saint Mary's University.

    As for North Atlantic, they should definitely appeal the ruling before the American Courts. Maybe they have some more brains than New Hampshire judges who don't understand the concept of Vicarious Liability.

    It doesn't take a Commerce or Business student to figure that one out.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 2, 2010 at 14:44:08

    Because Vitol owned North Atlantic Refining during the time, the dimwitted New Hampshire and American Governments should go after Vitol, not North Atlantic.

    Didn't they ever heard of the term, vicarious liability , meaning the owners are responsible for subsidiaries like an employer is liable for their employees?

    Vitol, stop blaming us for our problems. Take your responsibility like a true owner.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Billy
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:47:39

    Hi, Jack.

    Look up indemnify .

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    jim
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:27:40

    Jack, you are soooooo smart.
    I bet they never heard of the term vicarious libility. maybe you should phone them and tell them all about it.
    Those bumb lawyers down in the U.S sure could use a man like you working for them. You super smart person you.

    I only wish more rhodes scholars like you would contribute to this web site, or evern run for politics.

    You TOOL

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:26:51

    Jim from NL, I'm not a Rhodes Scholar, but I did take Commercial Law courses as part of my Bachelor of Commerce studies at Saint Mary's University.

    As for North Atlantic, they should definitely appeal the ruling before the American Courts. Maybe they have some more brains than New Hampshire judges who don't understand the concept of Vicarious Liability.

    It doesn't take a Commerce or Business student to figure that one out.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - July 1, 2010 at 21:22:50

    Because Vitol owned North Atlantic Refining during the time, the dimwitted New Hampshire and American Governments should go after Vitol, not North Atlantic.

    Didn't they ever heard of the term, vicarious liability , meaning the owners are responsible for subsidiaries like an employer is liable for their employees?

    Vitol, stop blaming us for our problems. Take your responsibility like a true owner.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising