Refinery must defend U.S. suit

Steve
Steve Bartlett
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Previous owner has indemnified North Atlantic in case

A panel of judges in New Hampshire has decided North Atlantic Refining must defend itself in that state's Supreme Court against allegations it sold gas that contaminated ground and surface waters.

The State of New Hampshire filed a lawsuit against refiners and manufacturers that allegedly supplied gas containing a compound commonly called MTBE.

Court -

A panel of judges in New Hampshire has decided North Atlantic Refining must defend itself in that state's Supreme Court against allegations it sold gas that contaminated ground and surface waters.

The State of New Hampshire filed a lawsuit against refiners and manufacturers that allegedly supplied gas containing a compound commonly called MTBE.

That stands for methyl tertiary butyl ether, which is said to boost octane levels and produce a cleaner burning fuel.

It alleges the substance escaped into and contaminated groundwater when it was sold in the state between 1995 and 2006.

New Hampshire banned the additive in 2007.

North Atlantic, which operates the refinery in Come By Chance, was one of the refiners named in the case.

It was owned by the Vitol group of companies when the majority of the alleged offences occurred.

The case facts say the Come By Chance operation manufactured gas containing MTBE for sister Vitol companies between 1995 and 2006.

The states believes North Atlantic delivered the product to Vitol in New Hampshire and was involved in promoting it, even though the company knew its product would pollute ground and surface waters.

North Atlantic moved to dismiss New Hampshire's complaint in 2007, arguing the state had no jurisdiction over it.

A discovery was heard in 2008 and, in July 2009, the refinery's notion was dismissed after the trial court thought the state had justified the suit and its jurisdiction over North Atlantic.

The refinery appealed that decision and the three-judge panel turned it down May 7.

In their deliberations, the judges concluded the state's legal action relates to the shipments produced in Come By Chance and shipped to New Hampshire.

They said North Atlantic availed of the protection of the state's laws and, as the exporter of record for shipments of MTBE gasoline to Vitol, the company was an integral part of the distribution system.

The panel also deemed it was fair to require the refinery to defend the suit.

North Atlantic was sold to Harvest Energy Trust in October 2006.

Harvest was taken over by the Korean National Oil Corporation late last year.

A spokeswoman with North Atlantic said the company does not discuss ongoing litigation, but also noted "our former owner has indemnified us" against the New Hampshire claim.

sbartlett@thetelegram.com

Organizations: Vitol, Supreme Court, Harvest Energy Trust Korean National Oil

Geographic location: New Hampshire, North Atlantic, U.S. Chance

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Billy
    July 02, 2010 - 13:30

    Hi, Jack.

    Look up indemnify .

  • jim
    July 02, 2010 - 13:17

    Jack, you are soooooo smart.
    I bet they never heard of the term vicarious libility. maybe you should phone them and tell them all about it.
    Those bumb lawyers down in the U.S sure could use a man like you working for them. You super smart person you.

    I only wish more rhodes scholars like you would contribute to this web site, or evern run for politics.

    You TOOL

  • Jack
    July 02, 2010 - 13:16

    Jim from NL, I'm not a Rhodes Scholar, but I did take Commercial Law courses as part of my Bachelor of Commerce studies at Saint Mary's University.

    As for North Atlantic, they should definitely appeal the ruling before the American Courts. Maybe they have some more brains than New Hampshire judges who don't understand the concept of Vicarious Liability.

    It doesn't take a Commerce or Business student to figure that one out.

  • Jack
    July 02, 2010 - 13:14

    Because Vitol owned North Atlantic Refining during the time, the dimwitted New Hampshire and American Governments should go after Vitol, not North Atlantic.

    Didn't they ever heard of the term, vicarious liability , meaning the owners are responsible for subsidiaries like an employer is liable for their employees?

    Vitol, stop blaming us for our problems. Take your responsibility like a true owner.

  • Billy
    July 01, 2010 - 20:17

    Hi, Jack.

    Look up indemnify .

  • jim
    July 01, 2010 - 19:57

    Jack, you are soooooo smart.
    I bet they never heard of the term vicarious libility. maybe you should phone them and tell them all about it.
    Those bumb lawyers down in the U.S sure could use a man like you working for them. You super smart person you.

    I only wish more rhodes scholars like you would contribute to this web site, or evern run for politics.

    You TOOL

  • Jack
    July 01, 2010 - 19:56

    Jim from NL, I'm not a Rhodes Scholar, but I did take Commercial Law courses as part of my Bachelor of Commerce studies at Saint Mary's University.

    As for North Atlantic, they should definitely appeal the ruling before the American Courts. Maybe they have some more brains than New Hampshire judges who don't understand the concept of Vicarious Liability.

    It doesn't take a Commerce or Business student to figure that one out.

  • Jack
    July 01, 2010 - 19:52

    Because Vitol owned North Atlantic Refining during the time, the dimwitted New Hampshire and American Governments should go after Vitol, not North Atlantic.

    Didn't they ever heard of the term, vicarious liability , meaning the owners are responsible for subsidiaries like an employer is liable for their employees?

    Vitol, stop blaming us for our problems. Take your responsibility like a true owner.