- April 22, 2013 - 12:58
the issue I have with these awards is that at the end of the day, one group/person "wins", while two others "lose". whats the point? Are the losers not as good? What is the real criteria for gauging one discipline against another? Its too bad really, that 2 people/groups that are nominated and dont "win", ulitmately feel not as good. I really dont see the point. All three nominated in each category should be considered winners, end of story.