Elizabeth Matthews withdraws nomination to the C-NLOPB



Elizabeth Matthews

Elizabeth Matthews

Published on March 14, 2011
Published on March 14, 2011
 
Topics :
Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board , C-NLOPB , Liberal Party

Elizabeth Matthews, the former director of communications for former premier Danny Williams, withdrew her nomination from the board of the C-NLOPB this morning, saying the controversy surrounding her appointment was “disturbing and irresponsible.”

Matthews, one of the staffers closest to Williams, was appointed to the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (C-NLOPB) 18 days after Williams left office in December. The provincial government was nominating her to be vice-chair of the board, a position that pays between $165,000-$195,000 and requires federal approval.

The decision was not announced at the time, and came out through the media more than two months later.

In a one-page statement sent to news outlets this morning, Matthews said that criticism of her appointment by the Official Opposition is “slanderous.”

“The work of the C-NLOPB is critically important to our offshore workers,” Matthews said. “I have been deeply troubled that those people have been used by the Leader of the Opposition as political fodder in this debate.”

She said the opposition has gone too far with their criticism, including linking her appointment to offshore safety and the Cougar helicopter tragedy of two years ago.

“To imply that my potential appointment could somehow compromise offshore safety is very disturbing and irresponsible,” she said.

“The depth to which the Opposition has taken this debate is a political agenda taken too far.  For this reason I am withdrawing my name from the nomination process.”

Matthews said with an election due in October, she hopes the Liberal Party is punished for politicizing the issue.

“I am not withdrawing because I feel in anyway incapable of performing this job, as I am incredibly proud of my professional accomplishments and gladly defend my abilities to the Opposition,” Matthews said in a statement released to the media.

“But the politicalization of this issue has gone too far. The Opposition will attempt to claim victory; but on the contrary, they have shamefully created this debate for political purposes. I would have hoped that if Ms. (Yvonne) Jones was sincere about wanting a qualified person for this position she would have made a legitimate attempt to find out about my abilities as opposed to spreading inaccuracies. I can only hope that in this — an election year — those who are qualified, energetic and passionate about making this province a better place will not be deterred from taking part in the political process by the unnecessary negativity that sometimes occurs.”

 

Complete statement:

“I was incredibly honoured to accept this nomination which was offered to me by Premier Dunderdale.  I never would have accepted the offer if I was not fully confident in  my capabilities and the level of experience that I could bring to the C-NLOPB.  I spent seven years as the Director of Communications and as a senior advisor to Premier Williams.  In that role, I was a part of a team that advised the Premier and Cabinet on major policy and negotiations including energy and other projects.  Despite Opposition Party claims to the contrary, I was also a part of the team for several projects related to offshore oil and gas development including the Hebron offshore development, the renewed Atlantic Accord, Hibernia South extension, White Rose extension and the Lower Churchill project. The slanderous assertion by the Leader of the Opposition that I “padded” my resume is both insulting and false. I think it is important that people in positions of leadership question the qualifications of those appointed to these positions - we should all be accountable to the public; however, Ms. Jones choose to attack me as a “flunkie” without ever discussing with me directly my true qualifications and capabilities. I have spent my entire professional career working alongside thousands of competent and dedicated people, developing progressive social and economic policy for this province, including in the area of offshore oil and gas. I was blessed to be a part of a team in Premier Williams’ office that I truly believe made this incredible province a better place to live and I know that my experience could have contributed greatly to the C-NLOPB.

The work of the C-NLOPB is critically important to our offshore workers.  I have been deeply troubled that those people have been used by the Leader of the Opposition as political fodder in this debate.  On the morning of March 12 two years ago I was the first person in the Premier’s Office to take the phone call regarding the Cougar tragedy and I spent that day and the days afterwards working with the authorities on government’s behalf.  I had friends and family who lost loved ones that day and I have been sincerely heartsick to know that in these past weeks they have been subjected to unnecessary fear mongering.  To imply that my potential appointment could somehow compromise offshore safety is very disturbing and irresponsible.  The depth to which the Opposition has taken this debate is a political agenda taken too far.  For this reason I am withdrawing my name from the nomination process.  To be clear, I am not withdrawing because I feel in anyway incapable of performing this job, as I am incredibly proud of my professional accomplishments and gladly defend my abilities to the Opposition. But the politicalization of this issue has gone too far.  The Opposition will attempt to claim victory; but on the contrary, they have shamefully created this debate for political purposes. I would have hoped that if Ms. Jones was sincere about wanting a qualified person for this position she would have made a legitimate attempt to find out about my abilities as opposed to spreading inaccuracies.  I can only hope that in this - an election year - those who are qualified, energetic and passionate about making this province a better place will not be deterred from taking part in the political process by the unnecessary negativity that sometimes occurs.”

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Ed. A.
    - March 16, 2011 at 11:15:54

    there is absolutely no decent moral ground with the liberals when you consider all the appointments made by them when they were in power. qualifications was not even considered it was based solely on who sucked up the most to the people with the power and i did not hear ms jones speak against one of the appointments but she can bet her bottom dollar that she will not have that problem because the liberals will never form the government while the same old crowd (yvonne, roger, danny d, & kelvin) is still running the show. maybe the two stooges (yvonne & lorainne) can give us a list of the qualifications needed to serve on the cnlopb. By the way i do not think that new people should be appointed as president or vice president. some member of the board should be moved up and all new appointments should be members only. at least give them a chance to learn a few things about the offshore before they can make any decisions. maybe then ms. matthews would have been a good choice. and i still feel the same way about andy wells. have a nice day.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Come Off It
    - March 16, 2011 at 10:10:17

    Herb Morrison, what differentiates this particular case of patronage is the brazen new level of it, rewarding Danny Williams' top adviser with a $200 000 a year job on such a vital board, one that is not intended for patronage plums. And the fact that government purposely hid the appointment, made all the way back in December, conveniently just before Christmas. And they purposely failed to put out a press release. And now Shawn Skinner's foolishness and lame attempt at damage control. This brings it to an all-new low.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Herb Morrison
    - March 15, 2011 at 14:42:58

    Patronage and political parties are like Siamese twins, which cannot be separated. Irregardless of political stripe, all parties face allegations that they reward the who support them, should they gain control of the reigns of Government. The self-righteous, holier than thou attitude (or perhaps unholier than thou would, be more appropriate when discussing political patronage), personified in the comments made by members of the Liberal opposition, would make me chuckle, were it not such an insult to my intelligence. The idea that any politician of any political stripe would think that Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are so gullible as to believe that any one political party in this province has a monopoly on the practice of making patronage appointments, leads me to believe that they think we are stunned. As a friend of mine is fond of saying, “I may have been born in the woods, but I didn’t swallow any green boughs.” The Liberals need to find some other ways to score political brownie points.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - March 15, 2011 at 09:39:16

    The way Minister Skinner is stuttering and stammering trying to defend the nomination, might I suggest he hire Ms. Matthews as Communications Director for his portfolio as he seems to be having loads of trouble getting the message out clearly for people to understand. Interesting too that her old job was posted in careers last weekend and pays about 50% of what she would have in the new post; good try Dan bye.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Offshore Guy
    - March 15, 2011 at 08:48:15

    Male/Female, not my care in the world. I work in the offshore. Call a spade a spade, this was a political appointment. I would rather this Position go to public competition so industry personnel can apply. Geez, what does it take to get the politicians out of patronage appts in an area such as this?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Shannon Reardon
    - March 15, 2011 at 08:27:17

    Gord Barnes, it has squat to do with her being a woman. As a woman, I find the gender card most offensive. Let's judge a person on their qualifications and suitability for such an important position, not on their gender.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      sam
      - March 16, 2011 at 10:16:26

      Funny thing about it Shannon is that both the Liberal and the NDP leaders will bring up that there should be more women in certain positions. And when you get a chance to get a person on a board that would contribute, the opposition objects. But Shannon we really know what you mean, saw lots of comments you have written before. Maybe you should check your leader's qualifications for her job!! Lets see how right Efford really was!

  • Username
    joan
    - March 15, 2011 at 08:00:41

    Hey class act----I garentee ya ms Jones is a heck of a lot more educated then Blundderdale

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Hmmmmm
    - March 15, 2011 at 08:00:36

    Did she withdraw because there's possibly more dirt to come out in this situation??

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    V..West Coast
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:56:54

    With Elizabeth Matthews withdrawing her nomination it will certainly be CNOLPB's loss...She is a very intellegent and well diversed person. What qualifications does Ms. Jones have to be Premier of the Province, I think not, lets see her put her CV along side Ms. Matthews and see then who has qualifications...It doesn't take a lot to get the dirt flying from the Liberals and now with Craig Westcott hired to write the crap for them they certainly know how to deliver it. Until there's a new leader and candidates with some crediablity don't expect to ever be the Govt.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      THANK YOU VERNA
      - March 16, 2011 at 10:08:44

      THANK YOU VERNA; from west coast; cbrook? U WILL BE REMAINING ON YOUR BOARD APPOINTMENT WITH PCs for this valuable contribution to SPIN; we will not question your qualifications to sit on that estemmed board/group of flunkies and yes people; keep up the good work enjoy that credit card u flash around; all the best

  • Username
    Jacob
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:55:50

    Malign Jones all you want but she was bang on when she said Matthews was the lynchpin for the most secretivive government in Newfoundland's history. How many times did I see articles by The Telegram that Freedom of Information requests were turned down by the Premier's office. Don't kid yourself, Matthews weilded the hammer there. Don't you remember her lack of memory at the Cameron Inquiry? Perhaps she'd be better qualified for one of those judgeships Jerome Kennedy was so critical of. Oh, even I forget that one. He was misquoted just like he was mistaken talking to Randy Simms this morning. The blind leading the blind.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gord Barnes
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:53:26

    It's a shame that qualified women are not being supported by women. How will qualified women get ahead if people like the Leader of the NDP and the Leader of the Liberals don't support women . She was appointed by Governemt, she was a senior person in the Premier's office, and was qualified for this position.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Political Watcher
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:48:44

    Not sure if the previous one got posted. I will ask one question: At $195,000.00 a year, how many private CEO's would hire her based on her experience? Please post here.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    i dont RECALLlTHAT
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:43:51

    funny; i expected her not to 'RECALL' much about the cougar tragedy; wasn't that her well known and partly assine reply to pretty well EVER AND PRETTY WELL all questions at the Cancer INQUIRY; "I DON'T RECALL THAT".....ABOUT 14/15 TIMES it was sickening; after that i never had much faith in this person i couldnt believe she was nominated for the CNOLPB but then again i cant believe buddy from fishery or labour union is there either; rex? jim? the chubby fellow; yes Reg Anstey; from FFAW? what are his areas of expertise; i was not too impressed with his appointment either

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    gd
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:40:11

    Way to go liberals. if u read my comment you would have noted that I stated many appointments could be debated. yes i do think this young lady has a lot to offer this province she appears to be bright articulate knowledgeable and would be an asset for the province.. I am not aware of the level that this govt has sunk to as you implied. i actually think the govt over the past two terms have done a lot for NL.Not all bright and intelligent people will get jobs in their own province. If the appointment is not merited then speak against it in a decent way and have fact and informaion as to why but dont attack the person in a way that is degrading, nasty and unfair to the individual in question. We have politicians who dont have political science degrees we had heads of hospitals who arent doctors and many other examplles of people in careers that are not within their academic training that does not mean they dont or could not do a good job.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    John
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:39:15

    I think Elizabeth Matthews is very qualified and talented and well suited for the job on C-NLOPB and I respect her decision to withdraw her nomination. However,I am sure that if Yvonne Jones had been premier for seven years and had Mary Smith as her communications director and was supporting her for the job at C-NLOPB, she would be singing a very different tune than she is now. Like Danny said about patronage and secrecy in government while he was in opposition to Roger Grimes and how bad it was, in practice he changed nothing about patronage and in fact, led the most secretive provinical government in recent memory. And not for a moment do I believe that Yvonne Jones, Lorraine Michael or any other future NL leader would be any different. What is reallly needed is a rule like they have in the States where someone like Elizabeth Mathews can not work in any government position or any government funded agency for two years-a cooing off period.. Given NL politics however that would be asking for the impossible. When in opposition they are all for change until they arrive in the premier's chair and see less in principle and much more to gain by simply leaving status quo in place and rewarding those close to them they feel worthy for whatever plum is available.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    george benoit
    - March 15, 2011 at 07:38:00

    I find this all, so extremely strange. On the one hand, I think its funny that no one has brought up the fact that the Liberals hired a communications director with solid affiliations to the Conservative party of Canada but at that time they claimed Westcott's job was apolitical in its orientation and responsibililities. THEN Jones turns around and throws a brick of Ms Matthews because Ms. Matthews was communications director to the Premier her work vis a vis the petroleum industry was essentially political-nothing more or less? My strong opinion-its time people in the liberal party to take down old Yvonne Jones and Kelvin Parsons for failing to come up with a strategic plan for the liberal party beyond the 'throw bricks and hide in your bunker drinking cocktails' plan continuously at play here, to the detrminet of our NL democracy.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    R
    - March 14, 2011 at 14:10:23

    A Director of Communications advises Danny on major policy and negotiations.??? Isn't that what ministers and deputy ministers do?? Does anybody have a list of the duties for a Director of Communications?? Elizabeth, I believe the less you say the better. Politics is dirty. Don't sink to their level.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Michelle
      - March 15, 2011 at 08:01:19

      Is her loyalty only to the premier. Why didn't she stay and work for Cathy's camp. Certainly she was qualified for that job. Why listen to Danny and give her somrhing more than she deserved. Loyalty buys out big time. Or was it just loyalty. Sounds like a juicy political favour to me.

  • Username
    Nestor
    - March 14, 2011 at 14:10:03

    Ms. Mattews accomplishments are acknowleged by most, but she has been put in a difficult position by this nomination. A background in communicationa and being member of political negotiation teams should not be sufficient qualifications to handle fairly complicated petroleum industry technical and economical issues. The oil and gas industry executives CNLOPB are dealing with are industry professionals and so should the regulators be. The petroleum industry is too importance for the future development of Newfoundland and Labrador not to assign professionals in lead CNLOPB positions. It is time to bring in people with petroleum industry knowlegde and experience.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      JH
      - March 15, 2011 at 07:57:47

      Good points, but have you looked at the CNLOPB members on the web site? Of the five, only the Chair and CEO has oil industry experience. The others seem to have a variety of experience in policy, financial advising, labour and the fishery. We know the excellent staff employed by the CNLOPB provide technical insight but it would be good to feel that more of the Board could provide a serious technical challenge of both the staff and their oil industry supplicants.

  • Username
    Off the mark
    - March 14, 2011 at 13:31:25

    Not hard to tell this is partisan, these comments, and the support/criticism of Matthews.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    GD
    - March 14, 2011 at 13:15:39

    I am sure that if we review all appointments made by govt over the years especially liberals We would question the validity. This lady appears to be a good hard working young Newfoundlander who has lots to offer this province. I have not seen her resume but I am confident that she has knowledge in all aspects needed to fulfill this position. It's time for the liberals to look at themselves and see what they have become. Nothing more than what you would find in gossip magazines or tabloid newspapers. Yes argue the merits of the appointment but no need to insult and degrade the lady. Another example as to why the liberals will become extinct in the next election . Smart move liberals to condemn our youn intelligent people who want to better our province

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Way to go liberals
      - March 14, 2011 at 14:09:46

      You haven't seen her resume but you're confident that she has lot's to offer? Why, because she worked as a political appointee for the majority of her career? If previous experience in getting jobs by who you know rather than what you know is your idea of qualified, you're right on the mark. The liberals were right to make an issue out of government using tax funded appointments as their own reward system for the party faithful. Patronage has been a cancer on NL for years. How many of our best and brightest were forced to seek employment in other parts of the world because their qualifications didn't include ''supported the government of the day?'' It's people with attitudes like yours GD that have allowed this government to sink to the level that it has. God help us if they get a big majority for another 4 years. That will be plenty of time to reward all of their faithful with the taxpayers money.

  • Username
    John
    - March 14, 2011 at 13:07:49

    Ms. Jones could save the province millions of dollars by designing and building roads, bridges, hospitals, nursing homes and infrastructure, etc. According to her, everybody has to know everything about everything in order to be considered for leadership positions. While she may not know about or how to use advisors, the vast majority of leaders know that they don't everything about everything. They will seek out the professionals and specialists they require for something, ask the approprite questions and then make their decission. She is a member of a party that put off a leadership for about 2 years before she was annointed to be leader of her party. God help NL if she were to become premier. We would be a "come and get it province" e.g. giving the excess power that we get from Churchill Falls rather than sell it ourselves rather than doing what is best for US as a province!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Confused
    - March 14, 2011 at 12:54:58

    She's appointed and people wine. She declines the nomination and people wine. You're a confusing lot. I have but one question. How many of you have actually seen her resume? Me personally? I can't really comment on if she's qualified or not. Unlike everybody here (who seem to know her "all to pieces"), I've never seen her resume and actually know very little about the womans qualifications.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Come Off It
    - March 14, 2011 at 12:16:16

    "Merit Principle", are you Danny Williams? What a glowing endorsement!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Agricola
    - March 14, 2011 at 12:16:04

    I believe that Ms Matthews has made a self fulfilling prophecy by withdrawing her nomnation. The position for which most Newfoundlanders and Labradorians felt she was not the right candidate requires a person who has the confidence and qualifications to take that job and do it in the face of any criticism levelled. The fact is Danny got this for her as part of his retirement package and Kathy had no say in it. That's why she is saying nothing. Ms. Matthews knows the score. She led the Danny charge many times when he went on his rampages against anybody who dared to question him but she's on her own now and there is nobody but Jerome to swing a bat for her. Yeah, she did the right thing by withdrawing.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Merit Principle
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:56:34

    Undoubtedly many of the comments on this nomination did come from perennial Williams bashers. But as someone who opposed Mathews appointment to the CNOPB vice-chair (and in a rare circumstance found myself agreeing with Bob Wakeham on Saturday), I can assure her that I am not an opposition hack nor do I consider her a 'flunkie'. She can legitimately claim that she was an influential player in a government that may well go down as one of the best this province ever had. That experience and her other credentials may qualify her for many important posts - but not this one. As I said in response to Wakeham, this particular job is so critical to the provoince's economic security that it demands the judgement, maturity and public respect that one generally accumulates over a long career demonstrating success in a diversity of highly responsible posts - preferably in both the public and private sectors. Quite frankly I don't think Andy Wells fills that bill either. Indeed by withdrawing, Mathews has shown more class than Andy ever did. Keep looking Ms. Dunderdale. Mathew's withdrawal opens the way for someone who can not only be relied upon to fight agressively for the province but has the depth of knowledge and experience to succeed - someone like Danny Williams. And while I find political patronage repugnant, it is unfortunately a fact of life in this country. I will not be offended therefore if Ms. Mathews does wind up chairing the Liqour Board (as Wakeham suggested) or in some other responsible position. Nevertheless (and not that it's any of my business) someone with her obvious intelligence, energy and youth might consider a challenge that would enhance her qualifications for even more senior roles in the years ahead. Law school or a stint with a multinational corporation outside Newfoundland are just two examples. In any event, she has served the province well and she has, I think, shown sound judgement and maturity in withdrawing. I wish her luck.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Protest
      - March 15, 2011 at 07:54:39

      Political Patronage, Cronyism is ripe. And it is wrong. However Crosby the politician, not only believes in it but thinks…” there should be more of it”… All NL governments practiced and are practicing it – some more than others, sometimes far down the civil Service chain – indeed to the bottom. They take the people's money and spend it on their buddies. We should make serious PROTEST.

  • Username
    don
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:47:27

    It is very important that people who are appointed to important positions are highly qualified to hold those positions. Political connections and patronage should play no part in such appointments whatsoever.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Randy
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:19:05

    Poor Liz--I'm sure you will get over it-You still sit on the board,you just weren't right for the job,Danny demanded you get..He'll get ya something else ,latter on..Be patient Princess

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Class Act
      - March 14, 2011 at 11:49:27

      I think the decision by Ms. Matthews to withdraw her nomination speaks volumes with respect to her integrity. I am confident she did not fold to the pressure of Yvonne Jones or any other nay sayer. From the comments here Ms. Matthews cannot win. She took the high road and still is getting nasty comments. Sadly, no matter what position she ultimately accepts, political or otherwise, she will be maligned. I don't think Yvonne Jones is in any position to criticize anyone's abilities or education. I have never seen Ms. Jones CV but she is so vocal (even thought unable to pronounce any word beginning with 'th')I would like for her to make her CV public...I suspect she doesn't have as much as a BA, although she definietly has a BBS (Bachelor of Bull****).

    • Username
      Class Act
      - March 14, 2011 at 12:55:41

      I think the decision by Ms. Matthews to withdraw her nomination speaks volumes with respect to her integrity. I am confident she did not fold to the pressure of Yvonne Jones or any other nay sayer. From the comments here Ms. Matthews cannot win. She took the high road and still is getting nasty comments. Sadly, no matter what position she ultimately accepts, political or otherwise, she will be maligned. I don't think Yvonne Jones is in any position to criticize anyone's abilities or education. I have never seen Ms. Jones CV but she is so vocal (even thought unable to pronounce any word beginning with 'th')I would like for her to make her CV public...I suspect she doesn't have as much as a BA, although she definietly has a BBS (Bachelor of Bull****).

  • Username
    Tantrums and Tiaras
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:18:59

    Hey "BLAHBLAHBLAH", HOW is it a "personal attack" or, to use Matthews' term, "slander" (in this case as it is in writing: libel), to quote what Bill Rowe called her in his book and to tell her to suck it up? Please. You're being as much of a drama queen (princess?) as she is.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Lori
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:18:47

    So what exactly are her qualifications? If I was writing a diatribe like that I'd sure as heck make sure my qualifications were out there for all to see. She says she'd defend them to the Opposition party... how about the rest of us WHO ARE THE REAL critics in this situation. The Opposition party is just our voice! Or has she been so indoctrinated in the Danny way of doing things that she forgets that this is a democracy?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Chris
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:18:37

    It wasn't only the Opposition who took exception to the Matthews appointment, it seemed like many others were against it. The Liberals simply repeated what most were saying. And why all the secrecy from the Williams –err Dunderdale government? The appointment was made in December and only recently came to light? I suspect the government knew this wouldn't play well with the electorate and tried to keep it low key for as long as possible. If Matthews was the ideal candidate, why wasn't the position advertised and a job competition held? If she is as qualified as the government suggests, she would have gotten the job legitimately and we would not be viewing it as a patronage plum..

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - March 14, 2011 at 11:17:12

    No Ed, you're wrong! It's Danny and Skinner who's to blame for jeopardizing Ms. Matthews' career by nominating and endorsing her and trying to defend the indefensible. While Ms. Matthews clearly has oral and literary skills, she lacks key experience in critical disciplines that should be factors in her nomination, far ahead of political patronage. This does more to damage her career than to advance it and puts the gender inequality issue farther behind. Political patronage appointments to crown corporations and cushy plum jobs has to stop; credibility will only be earned based on qualifications and what you know rather than who you know.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Ed
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:59:38

    Well done Yvonne, you have managed to malign the character of another Newfoundlander. I do find it interesting that you feel you have the right to question some other persons qualifications for a job when you are in fact trying to get a job that less than 20% of the population thinks you are qualified for. What chance you had of me ever voting liberal until you are gone from the leadership of that party is gone.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Willi Makit
      - March 14, 2011 at 11:48:28

      Yvonne Jones only stated what the rest of the province was thinking. Here's a free bit of information for you special Ed, opposition parties question inappropriate actions made by the standing government. If the criticism is unwarranted, the public pays no attention. In this case, the public shared the same view. She has EVERY right to speak on these things. October is 7 months away. Something tells me that's going to be the longest 7 months ever for Kathy Blunderdale. How many more screw ups will she make?

    • Username
      Don
      - March 14, 2011 at 12:16:38

      I agree with Ed. However what else could you expect from Jones. She will never be Premier so I guess the only recourse open to her is to show her ignorance.

    • Username
      sam
      - March 14, 2011 at 14:10:30

      Well Willi Makit...I guess John Efford also expressed what alot of people in the province are thinking. Yvonne Jones is not qualified to be leader of any party!! Maybe she should go look in the mirror before she starts critisizing someone else.

    • Username
      Traitor
      - March 15, 2011 at 07:42:45

      The communications director for Danny Williams has no leg to stand on in accusing others of maligning anyone's character. Nearly every speech, every utterance, every press release from Premier Williams contained some baseless accusation about the patriotism, motivations or character of others.

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:58:06

    I wondered why Premier Dunderdale had not weighed in on this nomination; it wasn't hers! And, just wondering...maybe the Fed's did not endorse Ms. Matthews' nomination. Any chance of checking into the Fed's position?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Puzzled by comment
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:57:57

    She says:" I can only hope that in this — an election year — those who are qualified, energetic and passionate about making this province a better place will not be deterred from taking part in the political process by the unnecessary negativity that sometimes occurs.” Since she has withdrawn, does this mean she is not "qualified, energetic and passionate" ?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Webster
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:57:26

    I agree that Ms. Matthews should not have accepted the nomination, but to blame it on the Leader of the Opposition is sad and not professional.. This political appointment was a concern by many people in the province and the opposition had the right to question it.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    blahblahblah
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:56:58

    Wow. "Suck, it up, (Little) Princess" and other such comments are disgusting. No need to make a personal attack on the woman. How the heck do you know whether or not she's really qualified? Do you have some insider knowledge the rest of us aren't privy to? Yeah, didn't think so.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    L Kennedy
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:17:57

    Oh Danny Boy! I am sure there was a Province-wide search for this appointment. Is she sorry about the way the appointment was made or is she sorry she got caught. Why does she get first dibs on this plum job? Don't worry, she rebound with another insider job. She won't be working at Walmart.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Blair
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:17:33

    Whether or not Ms Matthews was qualified for the job is no longer an issue. The fact that she has withdrawn her nomination because of external criticism indicates to me that she would not have been a good choice because she didn't like the pressure. What if everyone in Government or government agencies packed up and left because of negative opinions toward them, there wouldn't be a soul left. She obviously didn't learn much from her old boss, Danny

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      W McLean
      - March 14, 2011 at 10:57:19

      Au contraire, or, as they say, "Nothing Could Be Further From the Truth". She learned LOTS from her old boss, Danny. How many times did he whine about people saying Bad Things about him? Once he even left a cabinet meeting because someone passed a note into the room that Mike from Harbour Mille (or whoever) had said a Bad Thing about him on the VOCM, and he wanted to call in and rebut it before the end of the show. Whether or not there's a genetic component, thin skin seems to be contagious, too.

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:17:07

    Geez, I would have thought that Danny would have found a place in his empire to hire the most qualified person on the planet! Surely there's a place somewhere to put those skills on the payroll; an astute businessman would even create a postion rather than risk losing those skills sets. C'mon Dan, put your money where your mouth is and hire this most capable lady rather than find another plump, cushy politial appointment. Go ahead, take a gamble, use your own money instead of ours.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      sam
      - March 14, 2011 at 13:33:09

      yeh Scott, or is it Craig, maybe they should follow what the Liberals did all through the 90's. The Liberals would be better off trying to find a leader who is not using sympathy to get votes!! Hey Mr Westcott, Brad Cabana is looking pretty good for the 5th floor these days! Too bad the CNLOPB has lost a new, young voice for the board. In my opinion we need some new refreshing ideas on these boards. I guess the Liberals want an old "fellow" who has retired from something else. Same old, same old!! And i do not think Danny Williams has to answer anything to you...his actions over the past 10 years show how much he has done for this province. I guess you don't like to see anything positive being done. If it was up to you we would be back to the negative days of the 90's. Now go back to the 5th floor and keep writing those pathetic press releases...lol.

  • Username
    lonenewfwolf
    - March 14, 2011 at 10:16:42

    maybe there's a job at rogers communications for her?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Steve Winslow
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:53:43

    "Slanderous"? Really? Will we next hear about legal action just like in the Grimes "slander" suit where the same accusation was made but no follow-up ever? Matthews and her boss always love to throw around terms like slander like they were jellybeans. If people slandered you then take them to court. Otherwise just take your provincial severance cheque of 100k+ and move to Florida too.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Come Off It
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:52:13

    She had no business being on it. The politicization of it started by virtue of her appointment! Surely her withdrawing has NOTHING to do with the uproar over her nomination, and the deceit practiced by this government to hide it??? And yes, that Cameron Inquiry performance was a shining moment.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Political Watcher
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:52:03

    A secret appointment just days after her former boss resigns and we hear about it now. And she doesn't understand the political side of this? If the board needed someone to write press releases or put a spin on something then ok, mayber she could do it but to say she is qualified to serve as VP, that is a stretch.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Herb Morrison
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:51:52

    The fact that Ms. Matthews might well be qualified to serve on the CNLOPB, something I am in no position to question inteligibly, does not eliminate the possibility that ther appointment to this Board could very well be a patronage appointment. Maybe, maybe not. Obviously, we will never know. By resigning for the reason which she outlines, Ms. Matthews has demonstrated a level of integrity which is lacking in some of the comments made by others, regarding this issue. cnlopb

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:51:25

    Bravo Ms. Matthews! Your withdrawal of your political nomination is far more honourable than the nomination itself by supposedly honourable members. Your ability to put a Tory spin on it however, might be the best example of any attempt to justify the nomination in the first place; Skinner was right, your writing skills are exceptional. Sadly though, the job warrants much more experience in a range of other more critical diciplines than political patrongage; there's far too much of that weighing downt he board now. Worry not though, King Dan will provide an equally cushioned placement for you; your fall will be not be harsh.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    don
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:50:56

    Hey Liz...you were never qualified for this appointment and you knew it. Kudos to the opposition and media for drawing attention to this wrong and making it right.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    citiczen
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:50:41

    Why do we feel the need to attack people, who do good work, who achieve things on their own merit. So she worked for Danny...Big deal, that only means that she is more than likely well qualified for the position. political appointment or not. God forbid if we have a rich and province focused careers. Newfoundlander you are your own worst enemies. Be ashamed, that is why our most qualified leave here and make other places in Canada better.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Tantrums and Tiaras
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:50:31

    Suck it up, (Little) Princess.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Seen it all
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:11:38

    A political appointee complaining about her plum patronage appointment being politicized? That is just too funny! When you live by the sword...

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    axle
    - March 14, 2011 at 09:11:09

    i believe we hurt her feelings to bad danny boy

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Telegram is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising