• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (19)
  •  

Memorandum of Agreement signed on Lower Churchill project loan guarantee

MOU signed on Lower Churchill project

The federal government on Friday, Aug. 19, 2011 in St. John’s announced it will provide or purchase a loan guarantee for the $6.2 billion Lower Churchill hydroelectric project. The announcement was made by federal Natural Resources Minister Joe...

Published on August 19, 2011
Published on August 19, 2011
Topics :
National Defence , Dalhousie University , Newfoundland and Labrador , Muskrat Falls , Nova Scotia

The federal government today in St. John’s announced it will provide or purchase a loan guarantee for the $6.2 billion Lower Churchill hydroelectric project.

To view video, click here

The announcement was made by federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver and federal Intergovernmental Affairs Minister and Newfoundland and Labrador’s representative in the federal cabinet Peter Penashue during a media event at Atlantic Place in the city’s downtown. National Defence Minister Peter MacKay, who was expected to attend the announcement, was delayed in Iqaluit.

Provincial Natural Resources Minister Shawn Skinner, Finance Minister Tom Marshall, and Nova Scotia Energy Minister Charlie Parker also took part in the event. Nalcor Energy president and CEO Ed Martin and Emera Newfoundland and Labrador president Rick Janega were also in attendance.

The federal ministers and their provincial counterparts signed a Memorandum of Agreement to provide the loan guarantee following a financial review by advisors.

A news release notes the Memorandum of Agreement states the federal government will retain financial advisors to complete due diligence analysis of the loan guarantee. The Request for Proposal for financial advisors is posted on the Government Electronic Tendering Service (MERX) and will close on Sept. 6.

“The projects are great news for Canada,” Oliver said. “It is estimated that they will generate total employment of 18,400 person-years in Newfoundland and Labrador and 47,800 person-years across Canada. They will provide a significant boost to the economy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

According to the release, the Lower Churchill clean energy projects involve the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric generating station and three transmission lines. The projects will help reduce up to 4.5 megatonnes of carbon dioxide emissions in Canada and generate up to $3.5 billion in economic benefits.

“Today’s agreement is an important step to realizing the full potential of one of North America’s most ambitious clean energy projects,” Penashue said. “Coming from Labrador, I know that these projects are of great importance to Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.”

Skinner said the Memorandum of Agreement represents another important milestone in the development of the Lower Churchill.

“The loan guarantee will lower project costs through reduced interest rates, and this benefit will flow directly to electricity consumers in our province,” Skinner said.

A release notes there will be no fees payable for the loan guarantee, and it will extend to both the construction and post-construction periods for the project. The guarantee will apply to the project’s aggregate construction debt and the initial long-term debt arranged with lenders at the financial close for each phase of the project.

“Using revenues from the development of our province’s non-renewable resources to support renewable energy projects for the future benefit of Newfoundland and Labrador was a central component of the provincial Energy Plan,” said Minister Marshall. “I believe that Muskrat Falls and, ultimately, the development of the entire Lower Churchill Project will be major pillars of the provincial economy for decades to come.”

The province has said Muskrat Falls has been determined to be the most economic and least-cost option to address future electricity demand in Newfoundland and Labrador, and will provide significant economic and environmental benefits to the province. Muskrat Falls will create an estimated 18,000 person years of employment in Newfoundland and Labrador, with 7,500 of those person years occurring directly in Labrador. Over $210 million in taxes will accrue to the provincial government.

•••

(Earlier story)

Federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver has reconfirmed the federal government’s loan guarantee for the $6.2-billion Lower Churchill project. Intergovernmental Affairs Minister and Labrador MP Peter Penashue as well as Oliver's provincial counterpart, Shawn Skinner, and Finance Minister Tom Marshall, along with officials from the government of Nova Scotia, Nalcor, and Emera are also present for the announcement at Atlantic Place, which included the signing of a memorandum of understanding for the loan guarantee. National Defence Minister Peter MacKay was delayed in Iqaluit.

Oliver said due diligence by the federal government has not yet been completed on the project. Skinner stressed that the loan guarantee will happen, but the structure of the guarantee has to be worked out. Details are to be finalized by Nov. 30.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking at a campaign stop in St. John's during the spring federal election, said Newfoundland and Labrador would receive a loan guarantee or equivalent funds if his party formed the next government.

A loan guarantee was not included in the most recent federal budget, though government's commitment to the project was reaffirmed in the June 3 speech from the throne.

In a story from last Saturday's edition of The Telegram, Nalcor vice-president Gilbert Bennett said a federal loan guarantee should save about two per cent on financing rates. He attributed the savings to the federal government's favourable credit rating.

Meanwhile, a Dalhousie University economics professor said if the federal government were to follow through on its loan guarantee promise, that would be an affordable way of responding to potential calls for stimulus spending amid concerns that the economy was poised to dip into a recession again.

Lars Osberg said Ottawa is worried about increasing deficit spending and adding to the debt.

"Encouraging this sort of private sector investment is a key way of getting economic activity moving again," said Osberg.

"It's a relatively easy and inexpensive way to provide stimulus at this point of the business cycle."

Supporters of the ambitious project have said a loan guarantee would carry little out-of-pocket costs to the federal government, which can borrow money at cheaper rates than its provincial counterparts - and save potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in interest costs.

Osberg said the savings would be "significant," but an actual estimate would depend on the extent of the federal help.

Under the conditions of a term sheet announced last year to develop the project, Nalcor Energy, Newfoundland and Labrador's Crown energy company, would spend $2.9 billion to build a power generating facility at Muskrat Falls capable of producing 824 megawatts of electricity.

A transmission link from Labrador to Newfoundland would cost $2.1 billion, $600 million of which would be provided by Nova Scotia-based private utility Emera. It would include a 30-km subsea connection across the Strait of Bell Isle.

Emera would also fund a 180-km subsea link between Cape Ray, to Lingan, N.S., at a cost of $1.2 billion.

The so-called energy corridor would provide Nova Scotia with 170 megawatts of energy annually - about eight to 10 per cent of the province's total power needs - for 35 years.

Proponents say they hope to have energy flowing in 2017-2018.

 

Comments

  • Username
    More Questions on Muskrat Falls Project sensibilities
    - August 20, 2011 at 09:36:41

    Is it the right time to be doing the Muskrat Falls Project when the economies of North America and Europe are teetering on the brink of collapse? If deflation sits into the system and interest rates go to ZERO like what happened in Japan, over the past decade, will it be possible for Nalcor to obtain an Interest Rate on the Project that will be much lower than what we have negotiated for now? Are we willing to give Nova Scotia a further edge over us on creating the industry we should be creating from cheap power from our own resource, while we, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are paying the Muskrat Falls Mortgage, so that we can again avoid the province of Quebec which shafted us from the primary benefits of the Upper Churchill Project? What is the sense of doing another deal that is equally as bad, percentage wise of the benefits, as is the Upper Churchill Project Contact? I, personally, do not want to be saddled with an energy bill that I might have no other option than to freeze in the dark in my senior years from the result of being on a low fixed pension income, which the NL provincial government has no interest in adjusting.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Eli
    - August 19, 2011 at 16:01:08

    EUGENE...Like one Brooklynite said to another; "I have a nice bridge I'd like to sell you".

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Scott
    - August 19, 2011 at 14:50:27

    Yeah Dwayne and it takes a dumb Conserative to believe that this deal is in the best interests of the people of Newfoundland & Labrador. Oh yeag and I know why they annouced this so early...............ELECTION in a couple months. Its a vote getter, another Conservative NO BRAINER............which is what they have !!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Reality
    - August 19, 2011 at 14:48:10

    It's nothing as it currently stands, a worthless document, and this production was staged for optics. Can Harper, or Dunderdale and her crew of bobbleheads, really be trusted? Especially when it involves a deal that will put us on the hook many billions of dollars, loan guarantee or not?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Eli
    - August 19, 2011 at 14:47:58

    EUGENE.. U really expect Ottawa to just backstop this project without getting something in return? Didn't Ottawa insist and get a piece of the original Atlantic Accord? Let's just see if the devil shows up in the details.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Eugene
    - August 19, 2011 at 12:58:08

    What is in this for the Federal Government? In a time of Global Economic downturn is there any better way to provide economic stimulus? Global Markets are looking for secure projects, green projects, long term viability. Projects like this will strengthen Stephen Harpers position at international conferences when he can show that he is supporting and developing infrastructure. The dept uncured will be paid down by the project rather than taxes. I know that anti-Conservatives do not want to give any credit to Harper, but it is a good economic and political move on his part.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Eugene
    - August 19, 2011 at 12:33:42

    Eli If NL government is willing to develop Muskrat Falls alone, How can having the Feds co-sign the loans be giving away anything? By Ottawa co-signing the loan, NL will pay less interest for the loan and only part (1/3) of the loan shows up as debt on the provincial books.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bombardier has received Billions in Cash, not loan guarantees
    - August 19, 2011 at 12:12:18

    Ottawa has injected tens of Billions of cash dollars into Bombardier over the life of that Quebec Corporation. I actually saw Brian Tobin when he was the Federal Industry Minister hand out a cheque for $2 Billion dollars to Bombardier. What Ottawa is doing for Muskrat Falls is just a loan guarantee, and if it were solely for the province of Newfoundland and Labrador's interest, there would be no consideration at all for this project, not even a loan guarantee. A combination of The MacKays the Political Dynasty from Nova Scotia having so much influence in Ottawa and Nova Scotia needing this energy to build industry to keep it afloat, made this project possible. If this project goes through, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians will be on the hook for the risks of cost over-runs and everything else associated with the Project. I see this Muskrat Falls Project as a clone of the Upper Churchill Hydro Project and again we will be in debt for it for 30 or more years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Eli
    - August 19, 2011 at 12:04:44

    Pretty sure the spin by CBC News is this deal will benefit Nova Scotia. Other than the signing venue there was no mention of Newfoundland Labrador. What gives?

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Lane
      - August 19, 2011 at 13:36:24

      Nancy, I agree 100%. I am often embarrassed by how intolerant many Newfoundlanders are of "CFAs". We put on a good face when they visit, but if they try to setlle here they find that they are never accepted as Newfoundlanders, even after decades. And playing the victim card has become Newfoundland's national pastime.

  • Username
    Frank M
    - August 19, 2011 at 12:00:06

    An MOU is still only a "Tentative" agreement. It is not a guarantee at all. Either guarantee the loan or not.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Lane
      - August 19, 2011 at 12:50:45

      Frank, if you read the article, it says due diligence still has to be done. This means a legal commitment cannot be made until certain processes are finalized, which will happen in November. That's why the federal and provincial governments have signed an MOU - it's the strongest commitment that can legally be made at this time.

    • Username
      Frank M
      - August 19, 2011 at 14:09:24

      Lane, I agree with your assessment. However, what is the purpose in making this tentative announcement now? Shouldn't all parties have waited until November, when the due diligence should be completed and the General Election is decided? Today's announcement serves no purpose, unless it is a political one and given the political reality of NL today (another majority Conservative government), again the announcement is just unnecessary and does nothing.

    • Username
      Lane
      - August 19, 2011 at 15:21:38

      Today's announcement is not tentative at all. The MOU would lay out the process in great detail, but the final outcome of the process is what would be announced in November. For both levels of government and the private sector players to agree on such a complex process is actually a major and concrete development.

  • Username
    Scott Free
    - August 19, 2011 at 11:25:32

    yawnnnnnnnnn........

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Dwayne
      - August 19, 2011 at 13:38:56

      Hey, "Scott Free" - is your real last name Andrews? Or is it Simms? It takes a Liberal to downplay such good news just because it's coming from a Conservative government.

  • Username
    Eli
    - August 19, 2011 at 11:21:06

    Skinner stressed the load guarantee will happen once the details are worked out. Sounds like he'll give away the farm if necesary.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Rick
    - August 19, 2011 at 10:12:56

    To Boyd....one word....Bombardia

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    stanny
    - August 19, 2011 at 10:05:12

    MOU ?? code for another CON job by the feds in Ottawa and the suckers in Dunderdale's cabinet.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Boyd
    - August 19, 2011 at 09:59:55

    Is it standard policy for the Federal Government to rpovide a loan guarantee to a publically traded company (Emera)?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising