• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Review questions viability of $6.2-billion Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project

Muskrat Falls — File Photo

Muskrat Falls — File Photo

Published on August 25, 2011
Published on August 25, 2011
The Canadian Press ~ The News  RSS Feed
Topics :
Muskrat Falls.Nalcor Energy , Newfoundland and Labrador

An environmental assessment of the proposed Muskrat Falls hydroelectric dam in Labrador is questioning the viability of the project.

The report by a joint federal-provincial review panel says Newfoundland and Labrador’s Crown utility, Nalcor Energy, has not justified the need for the project in energy and economic terms.

It says there are outstanding questions about the $6.2-billion project’s ability to deliver long-term financial benefits to the province.

The panel also concluded that the project would have several “significant adverse” environmental effects on aquatic and terrestrial environments.

The report comes a week after the federal government announced it would follow through on a promise to provide a loan guarantee for Muskrat Falls.

Nalcor Energy says it will respond to the report’s conclusions on Friday.

The review panel provides advice to the provincial and federal governments, which will make the final decision on the project’s approval.

To review the report on the Newfoundland Government website, click here

For executive summary, click here

 

Comments

  • Username
    EuroGuy
    - August 25, 2011 at 17:53:40

    Why is an environmental assessment questioning the economic viability?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    HarbourMaster
    - August 25, 2011 at 17:14:20

    Ok let's shut er down. An independant review panel has said that the Muskrat Falls Project may not be viable !!! Ms. Dunderdale do the right thing SHUT THE MUSKRAT FALLS PROJECT DOWN now and do not waste any more taxpayers $$$. If not we will shut you down in October.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Spencer
    - August 25, 2011 at 16:45:27

    I don't understand. If this is supposed to be an "environmental review panel", why are they weighing in on the economics of the project?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    William Daniels
    - August 25, 2011 at 16:14:56

    We deserve what we pay if this deal is alowed to go through.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Christopher
    - August 25, 2011 at 16:10:13

    Oh who cares about "studies" and "experts". Danny Williams told me to like it so I will. Yay Danny!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising