• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (4)
  •  

House of Commons to expand by 30 seats

Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks during question period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Thursday. — Photo by Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks during question period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Thursday. — Photo by Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Published on December 16, 2011
Published on December 16, 2011
The Canadian Press  RSS Feed
Topics :
House of Commons , Conservatives , Ottawa , Canada , Ontario

Ottawa — Canadians will be sending 30 more MPs to the House of Commons in the next general election scheduled for 2015.

The Senate has passed a seat redistribution bill that gives Canada’s fastest growing provinces more seats, bringing the number of MPs to 338 from 308.

Ontario will get 15 more MPs, Alberta and British Columbia will get six more each, and Quebec three extra — all at a cost of $19.3 million annually.

The Liberals had argued that the number of seats should stay the same, but there should be a rebalancing of the ridings across the country.

But that would have meant some slower-growing province would have lost MPs, an idea the Conservatives didn’t want to entertain.

The big question now is whether the commissions that redraw electoral maps will make ridings as equal in size as possible within each province.

Comments

  • Username
    NL Under Represented
    - December 17, 2011 at 07:38:21

    Newfoundland needs more MPs too! When Newfoundland joined confederation we were given 7 seats, much more than the average population to represenation number of MPs allowed to other provinces. This was done to ackowledge that we were a seperate country. What even happened to this? If other provinces get new seats, Newfoundland needs new ones too in order to keep our ratios correct according to the 1949 agreements.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jackie Logans
    - December 16, 2011 at 14:27:52

    What a TOTAL waste of tax dollars! Fewer politicians in Ottawa would make much more sense. As for the Senate, don't make me laugh! Taxes would be better spent employing people to dig holes and fill them up again!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    skipper
    - December 16, 2011 at 13:20:17

    30 more to join the lame the limp and the lazy at a time when spending is suppose to be tight. How much of a hit is that going to cost the unemployed tax payer? And for what? Get rid of the senate to pay for it. Dam good ideal if I must say so my self they can then sleep at home instead of in the parliament building and it would make room for the 30 new MPS and their family and friends new positions.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Mary
      - December 16, 2011 at 19:08:50

      Just what we need, 30 more overpaid,under worked blobs, doing nothing but wasting our tax payer dollars.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising