• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • John
    May 05, 2012 - 13:45

    According to the company the delays were caused by design flaws in the government accespted design. How are cost overruns caused by poor design which to my uncerstanding not completed by Kiewitt be held against the company? @ the business man... the best deal for taxpayors is one that provided the most benefits for the tax payors. The last time they went offshore for a ship they spent millions trying to fix it. Why make the same mistake twice. You have way too much faith in the government being able to procure deals that don't in the long run cost the taxpayor far more money in the long run. Something tells me if it was your job they were declaring redundent or moving offshore that you would not be so quick to judge it the way you do.

  • Frank
    May 04, 2012 - 12:20

    Slippery slope that. If workers can't get any work because it can be done cheaper elsewhere then what tax payers dollars? The dollar value plays into it sure but so does the spin-off dollars that are in the pockets of local workers and are being spent in the province. That goes away if it is built in Norway simply based on the price tag. Don't get me wrong, I am definitely not condoning the cost over runs but maybe middle ground would be better served.

  • BBI
    May 04, 2012 - 11:36

    Hedderson says he hopes to have everything in place so the contract will be awarded "sometime next year". What a friggin' stall! What a bluff!

  • Harv
    May 04, 2012 - 10:41

    Is this a case of a Newfoundland Company taking advantage of of the Gov? Worst thing they could have said is we guarantee it will be built here, Mr. Kiewit sees $ signs after that. Let's milk this because Gov ahs the money. That's our money. Using NL pride to shake down the province for our tax dollars, is just wrong.

    • well said
      May 04, 2012 - 11:43

      very well said. that is why we need to use a foreign company with a foreign workforce. Building here using local worker is just too risky. The workers will delay and shake down the government as if this were a make work project. I really don't care where the ships are built. I just demand, as a taxpayer, value for money. If the Asians or Americans can offer better value for money, then the government has a duty to give them the contract. No more using my tax dollars to overpay local workers. Instead, cut out the local workers, pay the foreigners less, get the same quality ship, and invest the savings in health care. Who are the Losers? obviously the local workers who do not get to work on the project. Who are the Winners? every other taxpayer who will not get hosed by the workers. Therefore, in the interest of the majority and of taxpayers, less get some Asians or Americans to do the work at a cheaper rate.

  • Nasty Nate
    May 04, 2012 - 09:50

    That would be a shame. Resources and infrastructure are there, use them for a change. Stop your squabbles and get er done. Seems like everything is closing up these days. That is a trend that needs to end.

  • a business man
    May 04, 2012 - 09:39

    The ships should be built in the location that gives taxpayers the best value for money. Why should taxpayers pay more for Canadian labour when we can get the same labour for less offshore. Let build the ships offshore, and prevent and delays caused by NL workers.