• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (1)
  •  

Waging war on Signal Hill

Artist Sid Butt’s depiction of what Signal Hill looked like at dawn Sept. 18, 1762, following a night of bombardment on Fort William by the British. This is the final stage of the recapture of St. John’s, and the French surrender will soon take place. Lt.-Col William Amherst can be seen in the foreground (red coat) conferring with Royal Artillery officers. — Image courtesy of Parks Canada

Artist Sid Butt’s depiction of what Signal Hill looked like at dawn Sept. 18, 1762, following a night of bombardment on Fort William by the British. This is the final stage of the recapture of St. John’s, and the French surrender will soon take...

Published on July 18, 2012
Published on July 18, 2012
Steve Bartlett  RSS Feed

British, French fought in St. John’s 250 years ago

Topics :
North American , British Navy , Royal Canadian Legion , Signal Hill , Newfoundland , Waging

“Soldiers die in bloody battle.”    

The headline might read something like that, if a newspaper in St. John’s covered the Battle of Signal Hill 250 years ago.

“There’s no question this is probably the most important military action to take place on the island of Newfoundland,” says Robin Martin, visitor experience product development officer with Parks Canada.

He has researched the event extensively, and counts James Candow’s 2011 book, “The Lookout,” as an important source.

The battle took place Sept. 15, 1762, however, events leading to it started many years before.

The French and English had long been fighting on North American soil. They were also on opposite sides in the Seven Years War, a global conflict that broke out in 1756.

Peace talks stalled in 1762, and the French sent more than 800 soldiers to Newfoundland.

Their plan: to spend a month destroying British fishing infrastructure.

 “Not to hold anything,” Martin explains, “but to discourage the British from staying here.”

Under a captain named de Ternay, the French landed in Bay Bulls, walked overland and captured St. John’s without firing a musket. The British commanding officer surrendered because he thought the enemy numbers were much higher.

Cont'd...

Comments

  • Username
    David Green
    - July 18, 2012 at 13:26:06

    Interesting to read that the goal of the French military commanders was to destroy the fishing infrastructure. Were they alive today, I'm sure they would be happy to know the Harper government is continuing to do that for them.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising