• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Jones appalled with Quebec plans to transport ore from Labrador

Yvonne Jones. — Telegram file photo

Yvonne Jones. — Telegram file photo

Published on August 15, 2012
Published on August 15, 2012
Topics :
Caisse de depot , Canadian National Railway , CN , Newfoundland and Labrador , Quebec , Sept-Iles

Yvonne Jones, Opposition critic for natural resource, is questioning why the provincial government is not involved with a plan to study a new transportation link from the Labrador Trough to the port of Sept-Iles to transport iron ore products to market.

“I am appalled that Quebec interests are proceeding with a feasibility study to construct a new railway that will transport Labrador resources, yet our own government is nowhere to be seen,” Jones said in a news release issued today. “This is our resource and we should reap the maximum benefits of the mining, processing, and transporting of that resource.”

 The Cartwright-L’Anse au Clair Liberal MHA was responding to a report that Canadian National Railway, Caisse de depot (Caisse), and several mining companies in Labrador and Northern Quebec are proceeding with a feasibility study to construct a new rail line and port facilities to transport iron ore out of the Labrador Trough. The Quebec government’s Plan Nord envisions CN and the Caisse developing a new 800-kilometre rail line from Sept-Iles to the Labrador Trough.

“I believe the time has come for the Dunderdale Government to complete a feasibility study on constructing a rail line and port facility within Labrador that will transport our resources to market,” said Jones. “The port of Sept-Iles was nothing more than a fishing village before the development of iron ore facilities in Labrador West and Schefferville. Now it is a booming community.”

Jones said she’s concerned that if the province doesn’t take full control of the development of its iron ore resources, it will be another opportunity lost for the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Comments

  • Username
    Paul
    - August 15, 2012 at 21:48:57

    Have to keep in mind that the Labrador Trough is not confined to Labrador but extends into PQ and actually much more of the trough is in PQ. So have to make sure not too much is written into a word. But if deposits are within NL then we should seek to maximize reward from the resource, but that may mean a more sensible trip to Sept Ile. But I personally would recommend that we use Churchill power to build new electric blast furnances and produce steel and steel products right in Labrador and ship out as much finished product as we can or as makes sense.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jack
    - August 15, 2012 at 17:28:23

    Maybe if Labrador's infrastrcture structure is improved compared to Quebec's to allow ore transport within our province and to prepare for Muskrat Falls, there wouldn't be a need to transport our ore to another province. For starters, the Trans Labrador Highway on the Labrador Straits has to be paved as there are ruts and patches everywhere. In fact, I drove through it today, and I was appalled of the terrible condition of this highway, especially between L'Anse Aux Loop and Pinware. Secondly, the TLH from Red Bay to Happy Valley - Goose Bay has to be paved in order to make ore transport more reliable. If nothing is done to solve this crisis, prepare for "Alberta vs BC Type Battle" part 2.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ed
    - August 15, 2012 at 14:51:09

    This is a fair comment on Ms. Jones part, no need to be dismissive. It makes sense to extract the maximum value from a resource in the area where the resource is located. One imagines the comment was made to solicit a response from government to the effect: a. we have considered all options and this while not perfect is the best; or b. we have a study underway to determine the best balance of private and public considerations.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jonathan
    - August 15, 2012 at 14:03:47

    Yvonne Jones is appalling.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Fred Penner
    - August 15, 2012 at 12:38:47

    While you missed the boat on the Musrat Falls developement, I agree with you on this one. The only problem is that in order for Labrador to benefit from the mine (present and future) a significant outlay of capital is required to either build a railroad or some other sort of transportation infrastucture to access the modern market.....much like Muskrat Falls! Once again, the province is hemmed in by the geography of Quebec.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    darren
    - August 15, 2012 at 12:22:11

    You know what is more appalling, driving that 8 cylinder rig of yours into the "exit only" part of the Tim's drive-thru on Torbay Road. Why not go park and walk in? It would cut your emissions and help slow climate change, particularly for your Labrador constituents.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising