• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (10)
  •  

2041 Energy challenges review of Lower Churchill

(From left) Dennis Browne, Richard Cashin and Edward Hearn are pictured at a news conference. The three are members of a group formed to promote alternatives to the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric development. — File photo by Andrew Robinson/The Telegram

(From left) Dennis Browne, Richard Cashin and Edward Hearn are pictured at a news conference. The three are members of a group formed to promote alternatives to the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric development. — File photo by Andrew Robinson/The Telegram

Published on August 21, 2012
Published on August 21, 2012
Topics :
Manitoba Hydro International , Public Utilities Board , Manitoba PUB , Manitoba

The lawyer-led 2041 Energy Inc., created in opposition to the proposed Lower Churchill project, has issued a statement questioning the legitimacy of Manitoba Hydro International’s (MHI) ongoing review of the project.

The group is pointing to statements made by Manitoba’s public review board — the equivalent of our Public Utilities Board (PUB) — on MHI-led work in that province.

According to 2041 Energy’s Bernard Coffey, the statements amount to criticisms of MHI’s work.

“Following our own Public Utilities Board’s refusal to approve the Muskrat Falls project, Premier Dunderdale’s government should not have engaged (MHI) to do any further review of Nalcor’s numbers,” Coffey stated.

“The Dunderdale government ought to have read the Manitoba PUB’s (order), issued January 17, 2012, prior to engaging MHI,” the news release states.

“Neither the Joint Review Panel nor our own PUB approved the Muskrat Falls project. Following these failures, the Dunderdale government hired MHI to complete a review in private. In these circumstances, what confidence can the public have in MHI’s review of Nalcor’s Muskrat Falls numbers?”

Comments

  • Username
    Bias Group
    - August 22, 2012 at 13:02:20

    Of course they are going to challenge the PCs. Richard Chasin is just a mouth peice for the NDP.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Eli
      - August 22, 2012 at 16:18:58

      You still allowed outdoors without an escort?

  • Username
    Cold Furure
    - August 22, 2012 at 09:30:02

    Sad UNTRUTHS about Muskrat are: We need the power. It is the most ecomomical solution for the future. We need to shut down the dirty oil burner at Holyrood. It is not a giveaway. It is viable from an economic point of view. Sadder Truths about Muskrat are: It is a huge risk. It is to send a great big GFY to Quebec. It has come about because we could not deal with Quebec, only lose useless and unfounded court challenges. It is an admission of defeat by the goverment because they could not negotiate. It needs subsidy from the NL consumer to sell at discount rates on the mainland. It will make us uncompetitive and put hardship on the NL consumer. The rate increases are to be back end loaded to put down a public outcry. Much sadder Fallout: It puts the provinces fiscal capability at great risk. The children and grandchildren will suffer the excessive high cost of energy. We will have to go back to deal with Quebec for their 33 % share of Upper Churchill. We have to deal with Quebec to transmit the UC power to market or suffer the much higher costs to go around them. And the most disturbing thing is that our crumbling infrastructure could be given the desparately needed upgrades using the money. Money ill spent to further the Muskrat loss leader could be used for other needs such as health care and education.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Concerned
    - August 22, 2012 at 07:35:39

    Odd, this story isn't on VOCM this morning. Are they censoring news now, or is this not important to them.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jeff
    - August 21, 2012 at 23:02:06

    So, a bunch of lawyers form a company to protest a development project and The Telegram fawns over them. Lawyers know as much about energy development as I know about the Court System - SFA. My guess is if a bunch of engineers of which I am one formed a similar group supporting Muskrat Falls we would be systematically ignored by the media and opposition politicians. After a dozen or more years of being outside Newfoundland I have to say the negativity surrounding the development is the typical Newfoundland BS I remember so well. God forbid we have a positive outlook on life and build infrastructure for tomorrow.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tom
    - August 21, 2012 at 22:45:27

    This project needs to be scrapped. Wait till we get our power back in 2041, up Quebec's rates by 1000% and move on. No need to bankrupt Newfoundland now, to over charge customers for power we don't need, and to have such an excess left over that nobody is willing to buy.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    H JEFFORD
    - August 21, 2012 at 21:48:11

    NFLD should not make any big plans for 2041 when the deal in place with QUBEC HYDRO EXPIRES, QUBEC STILL OWNES THE TRANSMISSION LINE AND IT IS UP TO QUBEC WHAT PRICE TO CHARGE FOR THE USE OF IT, NFLD MIGHT GET A SHOCK AT THE RATE THEY WOULD CHARGED, AND THE BUILDING OF THE MUSKRAT FALLS WITH A TRANSMISSION LINES BIG ENOUGH TO CARRY THE UPPER CHURCHILL POWER MIGHT LOOK GOOD

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    H JEFFORD
    - August 21, 2012 at 19:07:14

    NFLD should develop the Muskrat Falls project and build the underwater transmission lines to the Island and onto the mainland of Canada big enough to carry the Upper Churchill power when the contract in place now in Quebec expires in 2041. Without its own transmission line to bring the power to the market from the Churchill Falls and from Muskrat Fallsl, it will be very costly for NL because Quebec will still be in the driver's seat. Quebec thinks they own Labrador. Newfoundland has to have control of their own destiny, there is not much to look forward to unless NL got an alternative route.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Maurice E. Adams
    - August 21, 2012 at 18:02:42

    It would also have been wise for MHI to have been more detailed in its analysis of Nalcor's 10-year load forecast track record (they OVER-FORECAST the island's total demand at a rate that was 10 times more than the accepted industry standard) --- and it the 'total demand' forecast on which Muskrat Falls depends.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising