• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

Coalition calls for moratorium on oil and gas activity in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

Published on August 29, 2012
Published on August 29, 2012
Topics :
Seals and Shores Coalition , Confederation Landing Park Gazebo , Delta Prince Edward Hotel , Newfoundland and Labrador , Charlottetown , Water Street

A  conservation group plans to protest oil and gas developments in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in September, at the same time federal, provincial and territorial ministers of energy and mines are meeting in Charlottetown, P.E.I.

The Save Our Seas and Shores Coalition will be holding what it calls a “quiet walk” to demonstrate the respect and awe Eastern Canadians have for the Gulf of St. Lawrence. The protest is scheduled to begin 11:30 a.m. at Confederation Landing Park Gazebo and proceed on Water Street between Peake’s Quay and the Delta Prince Edward Hotel in Charlottetown.

The coalition is also calling on provincial leaders around the Gulf to break their silence by declaring moratoriums on oil and gas exploration and exploitation activities in the Gulf, including drilling and seismic surveys.

Two companies, Corridor and Ptarmigan, are in the final stages of approval, from the Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board (C-NLOPB)  to conduct exploratory drilling and seismic surveys between Newfoundland and the Magdalen Islands.  

The coalition said in a news release it has written to the provincial ministers requesting that they discuss this matter during their upcoming meeting and support an immediate moratorium on drilling and exploration in the Gulf.

On Aug. 22, the C-NLOPB issued a "call for nominations" for Newfoundland's section of the Gulf of St. Lawrence.  

The coalition said oil companies have until Oct. 15 to express their interest in exploring and exploiting parcels of the Gulf, prior to the C-NLOPB conducting its promised Western Newfoundland Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to determine if it is appropriate to proceed with oil and gas development in Newfoundland’s Gulf waters.

“The Gulf is six and a half times smaller than the Gulf of Mexico, and is a semi-enclosed body of water that completely exchanges its water with the Atlantic Ocean only once a year. Because of its circular, counter-clockwise currents, any oil and gas contamination would be widespread along the Gulf coastlines of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador over the course of a year,” the coalition’s prepared statement reads. “The effects of a spill on the multi-million dollar tourism and fisheries industries would be catastrophic.”

The coalition also notes that scientists describe the Gulf as the most productive marine region in Canada and it is  “also a fragile ecosystem, home to many endangered and threatened species, including blue whales, leatherback turtles and cod. “

The Save Our Seas and Shores Coalition describes itself as a multi-provincial coalition of fishing, tourism, indigenous and environmental groups and coastal landowners working to protect the Gulf of St. Lawrence from oil and gas development.

Comments

  • Username
    Confused
    - September 19, 2012 at 16:30:02

    so the tar sands are okay then because it doesn't take away your fish or your soothing view, give me a break you condescending holier-than-thou individual. How about Albertans? don't they deserve a soothing mountain view. Hypocrisy (NIMBY) and I hope I never meet you.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mary Gorman
    - September 11, 2012 at 20:45:19

    Confused, you are absolutely right that most of us use and are reliant on non renewable fossil fuels to run our lives. But do you think, perhaps, we should consider conserving these fossil fuels for future generations at a time in history when Mother Nature needs a break from carbon emissions? You have to admit, our generation has already hogged more than its fair share of fossil fuels. I hope you would agree that we also need fish to eat and natural beauty to soothe our souls. Do you think it makes sense to risk multi-billion dollar renewable tourism and fishery industries to drill at 'Old Harry' in the Laurentien Channel, which is the main artery in out of the Gulf for over 2,000 marine species that spawn, nurse and migrate year around? The Laurentien Channel is home to the largest concentration of krill in the North Atlantic; these krill are a vital part of the entire food chain for the fisheries of the Gulf of St. Lawrence's 5 provinces. If you think about it, I'm sure you will agree that spawning, nursery and migratory areas must be placed out of bounds for offshore oil and gas development, or there will be no possibility of co-existence.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    confused
    - August 29, 2012 at 13:24:18

    How y'all plan on getting to PEI, car, plane or bus? They all need fuel, but it was not from oil produced in your backyard, eh? Just a bit hypocritical me thinks.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising