• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Atlantic Canadians prefer opt-out approach for organ donation, CRA says

CRA logo

CRA logo

Published on September 13, 2012
Published on September 13, 2012
Topics :
Corporate Research Associates , Nova Scotia and New Brunswick , CRA Atlantic Quarterly , Newfoundland and Labrador , Nova Scotia , New Brunswick

A majority of Atlantic Canadians would prefer a presumed consent model for organ donation where people not wanting to participate have the option to opt out, according to a new Corporate Research Associates survey.

CRA said in a release today Atlantic Canadians currently must opt in to register for organ donation. In Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, residents must tick a box to become a donor when applying or renewing their health cards, while residents of Newfoundland and Labrador are required to apply for a donor card or indicate on their driver's licence that they wish to become a donor.

CRA says 56 per cent of people surveyed in Newfoundland and Labrador indicated they would support an opt-out approach which implies presumed consent.

Sixty per cent surveyed in Nova Scotia indicated they would support this concept and 55 per cent in New Brunswick.

“Given the growing need for organ donation, changing from an opt-in to an opt-out approach presents a significant opportunity to increase the availability of such organs and save many more lives,” said Don Mills, CRA chairman and CEO.

These results are part of the CRA Atlantic Quarterly, an independent, quarterly survey of Atlantic Canadians, and are based on a sample of 1,200 adult Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador residents, conducted from Aug. 9 to 31.

CRA says results are accurate to within plus or minus 4.9 percentage points, 95 out of 100 times.

Comments

  • Username
    Maureen
    - September 17, 2012 at 22:18:22

    I would like to see how the questions for this so-called research were framed. Such legislation has the potential to be a serious violation of the autonomy and integrity of living human beings. Organs include ovaries, which are extremely valuable to researchers for in vitro embryonic research - an absolutely tyrannical and diabolical misuse of what most people would consider to be an act of charity. Furthermore, one can foresee a lot of John / Jane Does whose licenses were 'lost' or 'misplaced' because some zealous harvesting officer at a hospital saw an opportunity. Then there is the artificial maintenance of a person, perhaps against the wishes of a family, because the harvesting team might need to match up recipients. The potential for disrespect of a person's religious or personal wishes or that of a family is emormous.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      joe public
      - September 25, 2012 at 18:24:31

      I think that the spirit of organ and tissue donation is not in effort to remove dignity or cause anguish to those willing to sacrifice and give the gift of life through donation to another. The goal of deceased donation is to save or enhance the life of another person when one has been declared dead, either in the traditional sense of when the heart starts beating, or also in the case of donation after cardiac death or neurologically determined brain death. It is about the right to choose and the right to help save a life, not dismantle it or destroy it, or abuse the gifts given in altruism. Good on Atlantic Canadians willing to help a neighbour.

  • Username
    beAdonor
    - September 14, 2012 at 17:24:02

    BRAVO to the people of Atlantic Canada who indicate that they would support the opt out approach!!!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Kate O
    - September 14, 2012 at 15:57:22

    Having an opt-out approach in no way assumes that one is elligable to donate. It simply presents them as a donor from the beginning should the situation arise, there would be a host of medical tests to confirm the donor would be approved safely.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tom
    - September 13, 2012 at 17:39:49

    Canadian Blood services will tell you about 40 percent of Canadians are ineligible to give blood due to past history, disease or medication. And then there are some religions which do not allow transfusions or organ donation. More work needs to be done before this becomes law.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank M
    - September 13, 2012 at 12:44:02

    There is a serious flaw with such an approach: a significant percentage of the population is ineligible for organ donation due to past medical history. Certain diseases such as Cancer and others preclude organ donation or donating blood, even to survivors, as they may pose a risk to others. To assume that every patient who has survived an illness knows if they are eligible to donate organs or not, and then opt out of the program, is an assumption that carries very great risk.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising