• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (25)
  •  

McCurdy says FFAW has no say in Fortune fish plant proposal

 FFAW president Earle McCurdy  speaks during a news conference held Friday in St. John's. — Photo by Kate McCullough/Special to The Telegram

FFAW president Earle McCurdy speaks during a news conference held Friday in St. John's.

Published on October 20, 2012
Published on October 20, 2012
James McLeod & Kate McCullough  RSS Feed
Topics :
Allied Workers union , Newfoundland and Labrador

Fish, Food and Allied Workers union president Earle McCurdy made it clear at a news conference Friday that the fate of 40-million pounds of fish is not in the union's hands.

This comes after outgoing fisheries minister Darin King publicly blamed the union representing the workers at the fish plant in Fortune for stopping the Ocean Choice International groundfish proposal from going ahead.

McCurdy said the minister is trying to shift responsibility for the proposal from the government to the union.

"Clearly it's within his jurisdiction to make the decision," he said at a news conference. "Sometimes in government, you have to govern."

Decisions on the proposal, a plan that would allow OCI's fish plant in Fortune to export a greater amount - about 80 per cent - of unprocessed fish, are between the company and the provincial government, and the FFAW was asked to offer suggestions only.

"The fact is, it's not our decision. We got belatedly asked for input," McCurdy told reporters.

The FFAW sent King an alternate proposal Tuesday outlining the union's concerns.

Among other things, the union is suggesting that the extent of the yellowfish exemption be reduced and the use of foreign vessels, which would be required if the plan were to go ahead, be limited.

"Is that nixing something or is that bringing forward ideas?" McCurdy said.

McCurdy said King made it clear in a meeting Thursday the government does not support the use of foreign vessels, contrary to the government's backing of the plan.

The shot at McCurdy dovetailed with a cabinet shuffle Friday, in which King was shuffled out of the fisheries portfolio.

King said McCurdy wasn't negotiating in the best interests of some of the people he represents, and accused McCurdy of being disingenuous in the media about the issues under negotiation.

"This might be my last statement because we have a new minister of fisheries, but I'm going to tell you right now, unless there's a change in attitude and leadership at the FFAW, the fishery will not change in Newfoundland and Labrador," King told reporters.

Premier Kathy Dunderdale took a similar tone, saying the FFAW is negotiating based on principle, even though it's hurting everyone involved.

"The OCI file demonstrates in a very clear way the difficulty we have in this province in dealing with fisheries issues," she said. "The FFAW are not onside, and the FFAW are not onside they say, because of principle, but principle that's not directly associated with the people of the province doesn't serve any of us, and that is the nut that we can't seem to crack."

jmcleod@thetelegram.com

Comments

  • Username
    lost in the fog
    - October 21, 2012 at 22:58:48

    casey. the site is http//:www.marinetraffic.com

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    skipper
    - October 21, 2012 at 16:11:24

    In my opinion the government at any level do not run the government or the country big companies do. Oil companies,drug companies for example they do what they want and gutless govts are powerless against them.Of course that is just my opinion.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Rick
    - October 21, 2012 at 15:03:57

    Mr. Businessman, you and Harper wish access to the EU CETA (Free Trade Agreement). To twenty-seven countries floundering to survive for the last 3 years and more going South as you read this. I am sure Mr. King (a fish out of water) and the remainder of the PC government are fully aware of the CETA approach to Canada and NL in particular. In the European Parliament they just announced and passed into law a 2-year extension of support for their in-shore fisherman, but when it comes to Harper's Canada, conjoint with Dunderdale, in-shore means little. Again, enjoy today's investment pages on the status of the EU and hide the fact how dumb it would be to put your money there.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      lost in the fog
      - October 21, 2012 at 20:21:39

      Rick don't waste your time trying to explain anything to " Businessman" he has been commenting here for a while now on many different issues and has yet to make any positive or intelligent comment towards newfoundland Labrador or it's residents. because of the small minded,self interest, attitude of people like "businessman" outport's in Newfoundland are closing quicker then people think. I fail to see how Newfoundland can benifit if foreign people in foreign boats catch the fish and process the fish in foreign countries. those same foreign countries are fishing out waters all over the world. selling the fish resources of Newfoundland Labrador to foreign countries is like selling your soul to the devil.

  • Username
    lost in the fog
    - October 21, 2012 at 12:20:56

    fish merchants in Newfoundland Labrador have a Very poor track record dating back to the arrival of John Cabot. fish merchants control a business.. business controls government. this fish harvesters and plant workers are easily divided and conquered. most people are greedy by nature and want more, now throw in a fisheries minister with no balls and just try to short things out.. good luck

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    p earle
    - October 21, 2012 at 12:12:17

    The actions of the government and OCI in this situation are typical of what governments (federal & prov) and fish corporations (local and foreign) have been doing since 1949, use our stocks federally as enabler’s of foreign trade and locally, for as much as it is possible to get away with, for large processors profit and domination of the Fishery with our governments consent. The evidence of this is to long to discussed here but our government operates on the belief that we must give away the bulk of our resources to ‘out siders’ and processors in order to develop ourselves. Just comparing our province to others in the country of what we give away of our natural resources to others will show that we are 2.5 times higher then the average of 15% at 38%. In oil, for example, we get 13% royalties vs 38% and 42% for Saskatchewan and Alberta. Consider the give away of Churchill falls and the raw minerals shipped out. Judge for yourself ...the FFAW would not agree to a situation of shipping out 75% of ylt and 75% of the by-catch of cod and Am pl and 100% of red fish which would be caught by foreign factory freezers in our waters which would open the doors for all companies and fishers to do the same. What OCI wants, and what the government would allow, will turn into the future give away of all our fish stocks and its control to foreigners and the wealthy processors, taking it away from our fishers, plant workers and coastal communities. We have lost control of our fishing resource, what little is left of it, because governments have allowed the economics of big concerns and foreign fishing fleets to rule. The reverse of this monopoly, and way that the fishery has been run, is what is needed so we can first restore the stocks...for the benefit and use of our coastal people, and not for foreigners and those who are elite.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      a business man
      - October 21, 2012 at 13:36:44

      The fish does not belong to the coastal people....it belongs to ALL citizens. As such, if the majority of citizens realize a net benefit by using the fish stocks as an enabler for foreign trade, then I am all for it. In fact, that is EXACTLY what I am looking for in government...courage to serve the majority even at the expense of the minority. Whether you like it or not, the fishery represents a small micro-percentage of Canada's economy. With all due respect, I currently get no benefit from the fishery. I am not a fisherman, I an not a coastal resident. That said, I am a strong supporter of CETA because it would give me access to the European markets.. Sure, the fishery may die as a result, but I don't really care because I get nothing from the fishery anyway. I strongly support giving the fishery to foreigners especially when the royalties that come in can improve the health care and infrastructure that WE ALL use. So in conclusion, with all due respect, I fully support giving the fishery away if doing so results in better health care and infrastructure for EVERYONE. Currently, only the fishermen get to benefit from our fish, and that needs to change

  • Username
    betty thorne
    - October 21, 2012 at 11:51:34

    last year premier dunderdale's shuffer her cadinet when clyde jackman was minster of fishery now she have done it again darin king minstery of fishiery touble in marystown now fortune if there is enough fish to set over on the other side so there must be enough fish to go around NEWFOUNDLAND.it going to happen to fotune what happen in marystown cause OCI JUST SOLD TWO BOATS WHY SHOULD GO OUTSIDE.OCI is trying to pull a big one from the people everyone want to work not to set home all year

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Average Joe
    - October 21, 2012 at 11:48:05

    Typical Newfoundland government decision...Short-term gain to please a few but long-term loss for everyone!!!(including the workers from Fortune)

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      p earle
      - October 21, 2012 at 12:42:08

      Right on the money...Joe. And anyone who try's their best to put light on the situation of how our government operates things will be condemned, if it does not totally agree with their take on any situation, and blashed as not concerned for the provinces future. p e

  • Username
    sparky
    - October 21, 2012 at 09:56:09

    ear mccurdy needs to give-up 'ramblin-on' he`s been doing this for his lifetime & getting paid! to do it, by the union workers,LOL. If Ocean Choice International came-out & said : we`re going to give every worker $1000.00 if they go back to work at the Fortune fish plant as a 'start-up-gift', you would see earl mccurdy outside the fortune plant shouting out: "they can do better then this","are we going to stand for this", STAY HOME OUT-OF-IT-earl! you never did anything in your life only cause trouble,the workers in NFLD are seeing this first-hand,see-yea!!!! I would work for free before working for a stupid union.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bill
    - October 21, 2012 at 08:18:02

    It is unfortunate that the people in Fortune are put in such a position. However, it should be government policy to process raw resources in this province. Also, if any SMALL portion has to be shipped elsewhere it should be on Canadian vessels so as to support that industry as well. I think that Darrin King's support of this project for his constituients cost him the Fisheries Cabinet post. And so it should! This deal would treat the few workers in Fortune very differently as compared to the other fishplant workers all around this province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Maggy Carter
    - October 20, 2012 at 22:28:41

    King says the FFAW needs a new leader. He clearly loathes the present one. For his part McCurdy has had a difficult relationship with the fisheries minister but it has never prompted him to ask for King's removal from that portfolio. But, of course, that is exactly what happened barely a year into his tenure. King has been ineffectual as minister. Indeed he was possibly the worst in a long line of failed fisheries ministers in recent years. Fisheries is a difficult portfolio. There a lot of competing stakeholders and conflicting visions of how the industry should evolve. The department has some good talent at the senior level but it demands a minister with good interpersonal skills - something King lacks. He is still remembered for his petty, intemperate remarks on election night . He didn't show much class then and his disposition hasn't improved since. His attempts to pit fishermen, fish plant workers and fish communities against McCurdy achieved nothing other than the loss of his own credibility and hence Dunderdale's decision to replace him. She has put him in Justice to relieve Felix Collins whose own credibility has suffered from the ill-advised government secrecy bill. Normally Justice is reserved for a lawyer. Despite King's lack of legal training (or perhaps because of it), he is less likely to wreak havoc in that department.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Bewildered
      - October 21, 2012 at 17:08:14

      Maggy - how can you suggest that replacing McCurdy would not be a GGOD thing. If traditional politicians remain in power too long they can become stale. So to can the union political folks as well. I suspect the FFAW would become a more positive contributor to the fishing industry in Newfoundland if it had a change of leadership. Like most successful organization, perhaps their constitution should limit the length of tenure.

  • Username
    Bewildered
    - October 20, 2012 at 18:53:52

    The FFAW look out for the FFAW, and have become an uglier beast then the businesses and government they so often berate. How can you suggest the folks of Fortune are saying F..... You? McCurdy on the other hand feels the folks of Fortune don't understand the larger picture. I say poppycock.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jerome
    - October 20, 2012 at 15:07:32

    I can certainly understand the feelings the people of Fortune are having. They want work and this deal guarantees them that work. I believe however, this is a classic case of: Looking out for Number 1. To be crude, one could say that the people of Fortune are saying: F**k you Jack, WE are getting work, look out for yourselves. Whatever one thinks of the FFAW or Earl MCurdy, it should be kept in mind that the Union represents more than Fortune workers.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    lost in the fog
    - October 20, 2012 at 12:06:29

    can anyone tell me how many boats are fishing within 200 miles of the Newfoundland Labrador coast and which flag/ country they belong to? a site on the internet can give me this information for all over the world but not for newfoundland.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Casey
      - October 20, 2012 at 14:57:13

      If you know of this site, then please post it.

  • Username
    Peter
    - October 20, 2012 at 11:20:15

    Let us reflect on the pearls of wisdom from Jeremiah shall we? "Stund, stund, stund!"

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ken Collis
    - October 20, 2012 at 11:04:51

    Ocean Choice should be allowed to ship unprocessed fish out of the province only if fishermen and women are permitted to do the same. The Premier has said that fishers will not get help from government. They must sink or swim on thier own ability and merits. Fine. The same rules must hold true for plant owners as well. No more handouts to either party. Do this and see who is still around in 10 years. I'll bet most plants will still be around but fishers will be better paid. No one needs government help if they get fair wages and prices for a product. I quit fishing in 1991, and I was getting a better price for my cod then than is offered now to the fishers.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jeremiah
    - October 20, 2012 at 10:25:00

    Don't back down on this one FFAW. Just don't know what the Govt is thinking! Imagine, allowing unproccessed fish to be exported without adding any value! Stund, stund, stund! Can't believe it, going backwards.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Casey
    - October 20, 2012 at 09:58:57

    Leave the fish in the water. Stop giving away NL's resources to foreigners. Develop new markets! Anything but this route! If companies like OCI don't want to play by the rules shut them out until they can come up with a better plan or get another way to get the product to market.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Jay
      - October 20, 2012 at 11:11:11

      For somebody who has no say, he sure said enough earlier in the week trying to pin the blame on government. His story changed in a hurry.

  • Username
    roy
    - October 20, 2012 at 09:34:42

    Mr. Mccurdy is a master at putting the blame on someone else, why can't the union members see this and get rid of him, then just maybe there will be an improvement in the fishry.and things can get done to improve the lot of the plant wokers and fisherpersons. There has been nothing but turmoile in the industry for years while other counrties are moving ahead or appear to be.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      paul
      - October 21, 2012 at 08:51:20

      this deal will benifit OCI big time and Fortune for a little while, then wait and see who will be whining then

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising