- November 08, 2012 - 05:57
Well then why not hand out grants for alternative heating sources, more sustainable heating sources such as geothermal heating, wind power and solar power?? Much more sustainable than our current electricity source - and more environmental friendly. Would leave a much smaller "footprint".
- Cyril Rogers
- November 07, 2012 - 22:58
They have become so arrogant and certain of the rightness of their position that they don't need independent analysis. They know what is best for us whether we want it or not. We will get no say! Are we that apathetic that we will simply allow this to go ahead with no objection? If we do, shame on us! These figures were concocted to justify their grandiose scheme; as long as it justifies it in their own minds, who cares if it could be fatal to our economy down the road!
- H JEFFORD
- November 07, 2012 - 21:08
The Holyrood generating plant burns Millions of Dollars worth of oil per month. So much oil that the smoke pouring out of its stacks has it listed as one of the top 10 air polluters in the world, How much dirt or smoke is coming out of its stacks to have it listed as in the top 10 air polluters in the world? And how much oil have it got to burn or waste ? Because if it is pumping out that much smoke half of the oil burned is wasted?or not burning clean,if your car is pouring out black smoke its wasting fuel or gas, So is a oil fired generator. The cleanest, cheapest to operate, and most reliable and cleanest source of power in the world, when built is HYDRO POWERED GENERATING PLANT LIKE THE UPPER CHURCHILL, OR THE MUSKRAT FALLS, THE CHURCHILL RIVER RAN FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS AND WILL RUN For MILLIONS MORE AT NO COST TURNING THE GENERATING TURBINES. THE CHEAPEST MOST RELIABLE SOURCE OF POWER IN THE WORLD WHEN BUILT, NO SMOKE OR SHIP loads of oil, Powered By the Churchill River That Ran For Millions Of Years And Will Run For Millions Of Years MORE Turning The Generating Turbines Of Muskrat , And CHURCHILL FALLS AT NO OR LITTLE COST, THE CHEAPEST,CLEANEST,MOST DEPENDABLE SOURCE OF Power IN THE WORLD. " HYDRO POWER"
- Tim Jamison
- November 07, 2012 - 16:45
All you antis went on and on and on for monthes (if you don't remember): "Just wait 'til the report. Just you wait." Well, here it is. I hope you've been enjoying it
- John Smith
- November 07, 2012 - 15:49
Yes Scott b'y...it's all a well planned conspiracy...they are all in on it...you are right...they Nalcor and the government are all out to get us by saving us 20 bucks a month on our power bill/... LOL get a life...
- November 07, 2012 - 15:20
How many more self-serving reports is Nalcor and this guy Martin going to release. Martin has taken over the Premier position on this issue. Dunderdale is lost in the paper and Kennedy is busy shuffling it for Martin – Supreme Ruler on Muskrat Falls. Isn’t NL part of a democratic country? What was that we tried before Confederation – some kind of Commission – Who was on that Commission? Well this got to be the reincarnation – Supreme Ruler (Martin) asks Dunderdale, Kennedy and the underlings to sanction Martin’s multi-billion dollar deal . Without any input from the people or its public review processes, no say other than the blog! Well I guess we changed our governance to the blog – well that all happened a kind a quick a guess I missed the referendum on that one! I only wonder now who bails er out after this one.
- Maurice E. Adams
- November 07, 2012 - 15:14
If electricity growth were so strongly linked to GDP how come since 2004 demand dropped by 15 %? If residential energy use were so strongly linked to the number of homes how come SINCE 1990 the number of homes went up 19% and RESIDENTIAL energy use went down 17%. There is no justification for a 50 year average increase in demand of 0.8% compounded annually, and that is what MF needs to be viable --- not a 10 year forecast increase.
- November 07, 2012 - 14:56
Hey as an alternative we could use all the hot air coming from the NDP and Liberals. But I'm sure that won't last long..........soon they'll be saying it was our idea in the 1st place!
- Winston Adams
- November 07, 2012 - 14:35
Obviously Bennett is not considering efficient heating potential in their forecasting, which can substancially reduce demand and lower electricity costs to consumers.
- November 07, 2012 - 14:28
Old Jerome really has a way with words dosent he now. The man can babble off for ever and say almost nothing of any real substance. No wonder hes Dunderdales mouth piece. lady cant even properly read whats prepared for her most of the time. I am not sure who I will vote for next election but it sure as hell wont be for anyone associated with the PC Party.
- Cold Future
- November 07, 2012 - 14:24
The economic viability of Muskrat is a challenge because of the $4 billion premium to go around Quebec. So called most cost options like isolated island and build it as you need it are so much cheaper so much less a burden on the consumer ans so so much less risk they should be given much more study. We should not put so many eggs in a single basket. It is diifficult to make a case for taking on so much risk and potential for so much downside consequence, high power rates, subsidy for exported power, making ourselves uncompetitive, not to mention the extremely high risk with the capital cost. It seems that the number of studies to try to convince the public of this project is directly proportional to its high risk and its poorly prepared justification.
- Scott Free
- November 07, 2012 - 14:01
Whomever pays for the report, owns the report; and, as such, can dictate the contents and findings to support government position. The report was "released" by government, but who reseached and wrote it? A Tory supporter, no doubt; paid handsomely to spew out exactly what government wanted in the report.
- November 07, 2012 - 15:41
They also need more home care and more housing and better health care but all that is not addressed. any schools closeing this week?