- Tim Jamison
- November 18, 2012 - 13:08
I'm normally very conservative with my views and I usually view the anti-smoking lobby as a scammer's paradise (it has been since the first English monarch to taste tobacco issued a "Do as I say, but not as I do because smoking is bad for you," declaration, along with a tobacco tax), but I'm afraid this proposal has merit. The cost of patches for one person for a year is a fraction of a fraction of the cost of keeping one lung cancer patient in the ICU for one month. This proposal has the potential to be a real money saver, a real relief on the tax dollars we all pay
- November 15, 2012 - 12:44
I don't understand why the government should support those on low income to stop smoking. This is crazy. It is a choice to smoke and they should choice not to smoke. If they do want to stop smoking and need help they should pay for it themselves. They can pay to smoke then they can pay to stop smoking. It is totaly crazy. The money can be better spent else where. One example it people with rheumatoid arthritis has a treatment that is in hospital for 1-3 hours and the drug cost 2-3 thousand dollars per mounth. They are admitted to hospital for that time so MCP should cover the cost of the medication. I had to go to hospital for another medication every week and it was covered by MCP. I know why because of the price of the medications. I am one of the lucky ones that my insurance covers the cost of that medication but it realy should be covered by MCP. It just don't make any sencse to me. If they covered the RA medications then it can help with the costs in the long run with less joint replacements. So it make more sence to cover the RA medication that is given in hospital then paying for low income to stop smoking when they can pay for it themselves. It all comes down the the money and they realy don't care about the health of people.
- November 15, 2012 - 11:10
What a farce! If someone really wants to quit, they can buy the meds instead of the smokes. Don't do it! There are better things to spend OUR money on.
- November 15, 2012 - 09:39
Why??? I smoked heavy for a long time and gave up on my own. Smoking is a choice. Wendy with diabetes doesn't have a choice and has to pay. For low income on welfare deduct the cost of a pack of smokes per day from their cheque to encourage them to give up. However we all know they will continue and then complain they don't have enough to feed the kids. I assume Dr. Wasmeier doesn't smoke so she doesn't know what it is like to give up but it's not impossible. We don't need tax dollars to solve this problem. We need tax dollars for roads, w/s etc.
- November 15, 2012 - 09:25
If they can afford to buy cigarettes, let them use that money towards purchasing the medications to help them stop. I have a chronic illness of diabetes and am on ten pills daily but one of them is not covered so I have to pay approximately $80.00 monthly for that.