• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (4)
  •  

Supreme Court agrees to hear appeal from Quebec crab fisher over cut cable

Published on January 24, 2013
Published on January 24, 2013
The Canadian Press  RSS Feed
Topics :
Supreme Court of Canada , Telus , Hydro-Quebec , Quebec , OTTAWA , Baie Comeau

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada says it will hear the appeal of a Quebec crab fisherman who was hit with a bill for more than $1.2 million after he deliberately cut an underwater cable.

Real Vallee snagged his fishing gear on the cable in the waters off Baie Comeau several times before he finally hauled it up and cut it with an electric saw in June 2006.

Telus and Hydro-Quebec, the owners of the telecommunications cable, sued him for the repair bill and won in both Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal.

Vallee was found to have acted recklessly in cutting the fibre optic line, which voided his insurance and left him personally responsible for the cost of repairs plus interest.

Lower court judges said they sympathized with his plight, but upheld the case against him.

As usual, the Supreme Court gave no reasons for deciding to hear the appeal.

Comments

  • Username
    Duffy
    - January 24, 2013 at 16:06:20

    I would suggest that anyone who believes that the Supreme Court does not bow to Political Pressure is living in a "dream world". Judges are just Lawyers (most often Defense Lawyers) who had political clout somewhere and got appointments and owe favors to many. The world is run by power, money, greed and political associations. Does it matter where the fisherman came from - you bet!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Rich
    - January 24, 2013 at 15:33:59

    He'll do fine. He's from Quebec, not Newfoundland. then he'd be in trouble. Chances are the bill will be picked up by the federal taxpayer.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    PBF
    - January 24, 2013 at 13:26:15

    Anybody with any smarts at all knows why they agreed to hear the appeal of Vallee; it's because he is from Quebec. I'd bet that if it was a fisherman from almost any other province (especially Newfoundland) The Supreme Court would not nave agreed to hear the appeal but we all know they can't do anything to upset the Quebecers.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Get a grip
      - January 24, 2013 at 15:32:07

      No doubt. That statement is about as stupid as the fisherman's decision to cut the cable. Let me guess PBF, you would have done the same thing...

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising