• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • jake
    January 31, 2013 - 14:23

    well i guess the last persons that tow it is now responsible for any colisions adrift at sea!

    • Bill
      February 01, 2013 - 08:50

      I will take her looks like diamond in the rough one mans trash Is another mans treasure I can make a restaurant out of her anyone up for that let me know

  • the flower
    January 31, 2013 - 10:45

    I would get a prepaid cheque from whoever is responsible for paying,also the carges for being tied up at st.john's for two years .If they don't agree to that, sink the dam thing. GOOD RIDDENCE.

  • Moron
    January 31, 2013 - 10:13

    Roy why in the hell would you want to charge st johns for an error caused by an american tug boat charge them instead, obviously you dont live here and if you do your just a complete meathead. Charge the russians for having their big piece of metal docked here to 2 years and causing an eye sore for everyone else

  • Rich
    January 31, 2013 - 10:10

    Wonder how much insurance is on the ship. Someone is going to be a little upset if it doesnt sink.

  • flexxa
    January 31, 2013 - 09:22

    ...target practice! Well if we actually can find a Canadian Navy vessel or sub capable of such an action.

  • Steve
    January 31, 2013 - 08:59

    How much money is the Russian Mafia making on this fiasco?

  • roy
    January 31, 2013 - 08:57

    Bring it back to St. John,s and bill the council for the towing cost or the Hr Authority someone should be responsible for seeing that one derilect wasn,t being towed by another. It was taken from St. John.s and should be returned from where it was taken.

    • Fred Penner
      January 31, 2013 - 12:40

      It might be an idea to plant some flowers on the deck and pretty her up....lets give the rats someplace nice to live.