• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (7)
  •  

Cabana accuses judge of bias in Muskrat Falls case

Brad Cabana — Photo by Gary Hebbard/The Telegram

Brad Cabana

Published on February 23, 2013
Published on February 23, 2013
James McLeod  RSS Feed
Topics :
Alderon Iron Ore

It was another tumultuous day in court for Brad Cabana, as he tried to get the judge to recuse herself from his constitutional challenge of the Muskrat Falls project.

Cabana blindsided lawyers and Justice Gillian Butler when he started Friday afternoon’s proceedings by saying she was in a conflict of interest and should recuse herself from the matter.

Cabana is being sued for defamation by former premier Danny Williams, and his old law firm, Roebothan McKay Marshall, is representing Williams. Butler is married to David McKay, who is a partner at the law firm.

Cabana is representing himself in court in both cases, as well as a third case, where he’s suing Premier Kathy Dunderdale and Tourism Minister Terry French for defamation.

Cabana ran for both the Progressive Conservative party and Liberal party leaderships in 2011, and eventually ran as a candidate for the Liberals in the 2011 election — he garnered 344 votes and failed to win the seat against Progressive Conservative Ross Wiseman.

In court this week, he’s been trying to make the case that certain aspects of the Muskrat Falls projects violate his constitutional rights.

The court was ready Friday afternoon to let Cabana cross-examine Nalcor vice-president Gilbert Bennett, but instead Cabana started off by asking Butler to recuse herself.

On Thursday, Butler ruled against Cabana several times. In one case, she threw out one of the central planks of his legal argument on the grounds that he hadn’t provided proper legal notification to the federal government, as is required by the law.

Cabana argued that because he’s not a lawyer and he’s representing himself, the courts have an obligation to assist him, and Butler wasn’t doing that.

He also said her decision could hurt his case against Williams.

“You have the ability, should I lose this action, to impose damages on me,” Cabana said. “And those damages could render me unable to defend myself in the case involving your husband’s law firm, as it represents Danny Williams and Alderon Iron Ore in that defamation suit.”

Cabana called one of her rulings on Thursday “arbitrary” and said he was “very disturbed” by another of her decisions.

Butler listened to it all, and only interjected once to gently inform Cabana that she is not able to award “damages” against him, only “costs” of the government, Nalcor and Innu lawyers arguing against him.

The case continues in Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Monday at 10 a.m.

jmcleod@thetelegram.com

Twitter: TelegramJames

Comments

  • Username
    Marjorie and The Moonman
    - February 23, 2013 at 13:34:58

    We thought the only place to speak nonsense was on the Open Line show but you can go to Court too!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ray
    - February 23, 2013 at 12:27:29

    Doesn't this guy know he makes a mockery of himself by doing whatever he can for media attention? I can't stand to hear his name.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    gary
    - February 23, 2013 at 12:16:49

    Brad; Give it up b'y. You are making a show of yourself and just being down right off the wall... What creditability you had is gone right out the door... You caused this all by blowing your mouth in the first place. Now holding court time for this is just madness. Spending tax payers money so you can get your time in the lime light. You are now looking like a desperate man walking on a tight rope. With all this BS you are getting on with, you will never get respect.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Whaddaya at
    - February 23, 2013 at 11:22:38

    So, what's the status of Brad Cabana's request that the judge recuse herself ?. Are they going to deal with that or simply ignore it ?. Danny Williams is suing Cabana and the judge who will rule on his case just happens to be married to a lawyer who's a partner in William's old law firm. Any reasonable person can see where there could be a perceived conflict of interest with that situation, but this is Brad Cabana, so the chances of his request being approved are likely slim and none.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    gerry
    - February 23, 2013 at 11:06:42

    Well, I know if he ever ran again. anywhere, I'd vote for ANYONE else, no matter who was on the ballet....

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    sean rumboldt
    - February 23, 2013 at 10:09:28

    Way to go Cabana cut off enough roots and the tree will die

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    taxpayer
    - February 23, 2013 at 08:56:12

    When is Brad Cabana going to stop wasting our tax dollars with all these law suits that are just foolishness. All he is trying to do is make a name for himself in order to gain a seat in public office where he will likely be a warm body in a chair collecting a fat salary and hoping for a fat pension.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising