- Joe Moran
- March 01, 2013 - 10:59
So if someone has a disability jack, they should go Scott free? Because that's what your implying. It sickens me when people try to use the "disability" story to get pity when they commit a crime.
- March 01, 2013 - 09:27
Jack, 1st off I don't consider epilepsy a "disability" and believe that those suffering from epilepsy would agree, secondly, are you neglecting the fact that he did murder two 3 year old's, and it is his choice that he has not applied for bail? He shouldn't get out at all, and should suffer for eternity for what he did to those two precious little girls who will NEVER live their lives!!
- March 01, 2013 - 08:55
Jack! What are you getting on about? When or why should the Crown act as "good sports". There is no question he is indeed responsible for the death of these little girls....just some of the evidence was deemed inadmissable..(for that trial). HE hasn't bothered to apply for bail. He wasn't found innocent. The conviction is overtuned, but the charges are still there. As for his disability...well, I don't understand why this is even an issue. Never in any of the articles I have read, including coverage of the trile, did I hear of him having a seizure. If his epilepsy is so debilating, why didn't we hear of that. I know several people with epilepsy, all with varying degrees of the condition. One has seizures almost weekly, leaving him sick and bed ridden for days, the other has been seizure free for years. So if this is so promenant with Mr. Hart, why haven't they made any mention of a seizure??????? Did he have this as a child and outgrew the seizures, or are they under control with meds? In any case, it doesn't excuse his actions. This is a man who bragged about killing his children, whether he knew Mr. Big was an undercover cop or not, he still bragged about it to make himself look good. Epilepsy or any kind of disability is no excuse for that. How has the justice system mistreated him? He fires lawyers, don't show up for court proceedings...something that I always thought was contempt, and a chargeable offence. Seems to me he is getting special treatment. Seems to me he is getting away with murder. 2 little girls are dead! He is responsible for that. Being in jail, is where he should be. Just too bad he don't have a conscience,,,,or is that a disability too?
- March 01, 2013 - 08:27
if watching his children how did the girls get in the water dont b silly people he should never b able to walk the streets again
- March 01, 2013 - 07:12
As a disabled person myself, I'm more than appalled at how the Newfoundland and Labrador's Justice System are mistreating disabled persons whom had their conviction overturned but still locked up, particularly Nelson Hart. In the case of Nelson Hart, he had his murder convictions overturned, but instead of being released as per Canadian law, he is still locked up meaning his human rights are violated. To add insult to injury, instead of acting like "good sports" and accepting the Judge's decision, the Crown Prosecutors still are appealing the ruling, meaning they are denying his right to fair justice. Because Nelson is not given a fair trial as the courts failed to accommodate his disability which is Epilepsy, still locked up in jail despite having convictions overturned, and prosecutors acting like poor sports, I believe that this province's Justice System are discriminating against disabled persons and our Justice System should be ashamed of themselves. I'm not condoning the murder of his children, I am condoning how the Justice System continues to mistreat Nelson and other disabled Newfoundlanders and Labradorians becoming victimized from the ignorant Justice System, particularly Chesley Earle and Dane Spurrell.
- Pam Frampton
- March 01, 2013 - 07:29
As the article points out, Nelson Hart is still in jail because he simply has not applied for bail.