Michael calls for leadership review in 2014

James McLeod
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Michael calling for leadership review on Saturdy

New Democrat Leader Lorraine Michael was striking a markedly conciliatory tone on Saturday afternoon when she told reporters that she wants a party leadership review in 2014.

It was earlier this week when she said she felt “betrayed” by her four caucus members when they sent a letter to her, making a similar request.

“I’m putting all of this in the hands of the membership, and asking the membership to decide whether or not they want me as the leader going into 2015,” she said. “I feel confident going into a convention that the majority of the party is going to say they want me to bring the party into 2015.”

The NDP has been in crisis this week, after the letter was sent on Sunday, and then broke in the media Monday evening.

The letter questioned Michael’s ability to recruit candidates to run for the party, and called for a 2014 leadership convention.

From there, the party opened up into bitter back-and-forth accusations, and public infighting.

MHAs George Murphy and Gerry Rogers backtracked, saying that they wanted a leadership review after all, not a leadership convention.

MHA Dale Kirby openly criticized Michael's leadership style, and said he had difficulty working with her.

Murphy also accused Kirby of threatening him, and in turn, Kirby accused Murphy of lying.

The final MHA, Christopher Mitchelmore, said he stood by the letter which called for a party leadership convention to look at potentially replacing Michael, but he declined to say much more than that.

Michael said the announcement came at the end of a "full and frank discussion" with her fellow caucus members.

A lot of it seems to have boiled down to a simple misunderstanding of the difference between a leadership convention and a leadership review.

A review is essentially a yes-or-no vote by party members at a convention on whether they support the current leader. A leadership convention only happens when the top job is vacant, so by asking for that, the four caucus members were essentially calling for Michael’s resignation.

Michael acknowledged the past six days have been damaging for her party, but said that she’s trying not to focus on that.

“I really have no idea how damaging it might be. All I know is we have to start from where we are and we have to build,” she said. “What happened has happened, and our position is we have to move forward, and that’s what I’m doing.”

Michael’s Saturday afternoon announcement came at the end of a two-day caucus meeting at an undisclosed location to avoid media scrutiny. The party brought in a mediator to help facilitate the talks.

The NDP convention in 2014 was scheduled for October, which would leave Michael’s leadership as an open question for a full year. She said it will be up to the party executive to decide whether the convention needs to happen sooner.

Michael wouldn’t put a specific number on what percentage of party support she’d like to see in order to feel secure in her leadership.

I’m hoping that the majority — a good majority of the party — will say they want me,” she said. “And I’ll go by whatever the constitutional change that they’re putting in place.”

None of the other MHAs were immediately available for comment.

Organizations: NDP

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Krykos
    October 28, 2013 - 15:40

    This is politics and it happens with all parties. Childish to make it all public. Why not close the doors right away and sort out the misunderstanding before going to the CBC. Supporters of the party should not leave because of a tiff like this.

  • Dee
    October 28, 2013 - 09:20

    This is too bad NDP were getting pretty strong,now as a voter for NDP the party had just lost my vote,two of the four party members just blew the chance of them ever being strong again.Really shows how sleazy they really are.Sorry you won't get my vote again.

  • Dee
    October 28, 2013 - 09:17

    This is too bad NDP were getting pretty strong,now as a voter for NDP the party had just lost my vote,two of the four party members just blew the chance of them ever being strong again.Really shows how sleazy they really are.Sorry you won't get my vote again.

  • Patricia
    October 28, 2013 - 08:58

    The gig is up for the NDP.Why would anybody in their right minds vote for them?? I don't blame Lorraine. She's the one who got stomped, but they will pay for this in the next election. People don't forget .They showed their true colors and it wasn't ORANGE

  • Marlene CClarke
    October 27, 2013 - 20:48

    I was very disappointed at the way things were done by the NDP members. I have lost all confidence in their ability to be open and honest to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, when they can't even be honest with each other.

  • Bilbo Baggins
    October 27, 2013 - 19:16

    So, the NDP are going to try and move forward, and put this out of their minds..?....well anyone would be out of their minds to even consider voting for one of these jokers. And they will certainly try to cover this up, but hey, the damage is done and they exposed themselves for who and what they really are, just a bunch of clowns. No, Loraine, we will not forget this.

  • Randy
    October 27, 2013 - 14:06

    She's another Joey

  • Brian
    October 27, 2013 - 13:03

    It is a sad time for the NDP and the PC'sbut a wonderful time for the Liberals. Things couldn't get better for the Liberals until they form the next government. Sorry Lorraine, you won't like the answer to your leadership review. You have done great things for the party but --- the party needs to grow and you are not the person to lead it into the next election . I hope you stay on . You are probably the person that leaked the email to the media.

  • NDP Blunder
    October 27, 2013 - 10:57

    Thank you Dale Kirby...your snakey ways have shaken the party.

  • Dale Penney
    October 26, 2013 - 19:24

    Does this mean she and caucus will not be speaking about policy and other issues occurring in the province?? I hope it is not the same old same old.,

  • wavy
    October 26, 2013 - 14:27

    So, essentially, what you're saying is this all boils down to semantics, he asked rhetorically? Nice.