Accused murderer to consider appeal

Rosie Mullaley
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Trevor Pardy told his lawyer will be paid legal aid rates

A man accused of gunning down his girlfriend will decide soon whether or not he will appeal a judge’s decision that ruled that his lawyer must be paid at legal-aid rates.
“Obviously, he’s very disappointed,” Bob Buckingham told The Telegram Thursday, shortly after he spoke with Trevor Pardy at Her Majesty’s Penitentiary. “This is a very serious issue.”

Trevor Pardy, pictured in the prisoner’s box, is hoping St. John’s lawyer Bob Buckingham can convince a Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court justice that the attorney general should cover fees for a private lawyer in his murder case. The family of Pardy’s alleged victim, Triffie Wadman, is pictured in the background. — Photo by Andrew Robinson/The Telegram

Buckingham represented Pardy in a four-day hearing held at Newfoundland Supreme Court last month to argue the merits of Pardy’s application.

Pardy applied to have the attorney general cover the cost of his private counsel at a rate of pay above what the Legal Aid Commission allows.

Legal Aid has already approved funding for Pardy to cover the cost of private counsel at legal-aid rates or a legal aid staff lawyer. Pardy has argued the legal-aid rate of $60 per hour is too low to obtain an experienced lawyer to represent him.

But in a decision handed down Thursday, Justice James Adams disagreed and denied the application.

“I am satisfied that there are a number of legal aid staff lawyers with sufficient experience and expertise who are available and willing to represent Mr. Pardy on the charges he is facing,” Adams said in his written decision.

“He has not satisfied me on any objective basis either under the court’s inherent jurisdiction, the Charer, or any statutory provision that on the balance of probabilities his right to a fair trial would be detrimentally affected by such representation.

“An accused does not have to like a lawyer to be able to form a reasonable solicitor/client relationship. ... “I am satisfied that any competent, experienced criminal lawyer could ensure that Mr. Pardy receives a fair trial.”

But Pardy claims he hasn’t been able to establish a good relationship with any of the legal aid lawyers he’s met with.

He wants Buckingham. Buckingham, however, refuses to do it at such a low pay.

“It’s a murder trial,” Buckingham said. “I can’t do a murder trial on a legal aid certificate.”

Pardy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the shooting death of Triffie Wadman, his former girlfriend, who was killed Oct. 1, 2011, in St. John's. He was arrested that day and has been in custody ever since.

His trial had been set to start this month, but was delayed due to the legal representation issues. A new date won't be set until that is resolved.

The case will be called again in court Dec. 2. Lawyers had hoped to set trial dates at that time, but it may depend on what Pardy decides.

“He’s going to take the night to read over the judge’s decision and analyze it,” Buckingham said.

“There are a whole bunch of things he has to consider. By tomorrow, he’ll have a lot more information he can weigh and make some decisions about whether he will get other counsel or appeal the judge’s decision.

“These are major issues and we can’t make decisions on it on a moment’s notice.”

Twitter: @TelyCourt

Organizations: Legal Aid Commission

Geographic location: St. John's

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • hate when people think they know what their talking about
    November 11, 2013 - 02:34

    There is no 1.5 or 2 for a murder conviction

  • Glenn Stockley
    November 10, 2013 - 08:31

    jim adams decision can be appealed tp a higher court...he isn't God....even if he thinks so...i would be seeking a lawyer outside of the nfld bar for any serious charges.....the most expensive ones are mostly Q.C.s which stands for Questionable Competence

  • bill traverse
    November 08, 2013 - 08:16

    doesn't anyone else see the plan this person has in place, the longer he can delay the process, the longer he is in custody before trial, therefore the time he serves now becomes time and half towards he final sentencing, so 3 yrs now is 4.5 yrs.. if found guilty and sentenced to 12 yrs brings it down to 7.5, with good behavior gets him out after another 4..... 7 yrs for taking the life of a young single working mother, Bravo justice system, Bravo

    • tom
      November 08, 2013 - 12:07

      As of October 2009 the feds passed a law limiting a judges ability to give 2 for 1, and even 1.5 for 1. A judge must have a valid and just reason to offer anything and for this case the accused will not get anything other than 1 for 1 once found guilty and sentenced. 2 for 1 and 1.5 for 1 is practically non existent now.

  • mick
    November 08, 2013 - 07:22

    he is disappointed? he obviously does not live in the real world. he cannot afford the high price lawyer he wants and of course wants the taxpayers to foot the bill.

  • *crazy*
    November 08, 2013 - 06:17

    why should this guy get any special treatment, he is prolonging the trial get it started and get it over with you have a family dealing with the loss of a love one and all the courts are doing is dealing with his foolishness what is wrong with our legal system wasting money, on this person that will probably walk away Scot free.....sad...sad....sad