Sign out

Daniel
Daniel MacEachern
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Home-salon owner unhappy she’s not allowed to identify her business

A home-based business owner in St.  John’s is unhappy she’s not allowed to have a sign advertising her esthetics salon, but a city councillor says he thinks it should be a restriction on all home businesses.

At Monday’s regular council meeting, St. John’s city council approved an application from Tina Kavanagh of Newfoundland Drive, who applied for permission to operate the salon at her home.

But given two submissions from neighbours with concerns about the effect of the business and signage on traffic, parking and property values, council decided Kavanagh couldn’t have a sign outside her home identifying the business.

Ward 1 Coun. Danny Breen said at Monday’s meeting that the city is seeing a growing number of applications for home-based businesses, and other such operations in the area don’t seem to have had much effect on parking or traffic.

But he noted both objections to the application mentioned signage, and suggested the prohibition of a sign outside.

“I think, for most home occupations in residential areas, I don’t think we should have signage allowed on those properties,” he said.

There was no more discussion of the restriction at the meeting, and the application was approved with the restriction in place.

But Kavanagh says the prohibition — which she says she’ll comply with — will hurt her appointment-based business, where she provides services like facial peels, acne treatment and makeup.

Her plan was to mount a sign identifying her Elegant Touch salon on her front deck.

“It wouldn’t be a heavy traffic business anyway,” she said, noting that she sees one client at a time for up to two hours at a stretch. The sign would have helped current — and future — clients know she’s there.

“I’m surviving now, but a sign would have been nice. … so that people can find it easy.”

Kavanagh said she doesn’t understand the logic behind council’s decision.

“It’s a sin to say it, but the decisions made here are up and down like a toilet seat,” she said.

“The city, they create their own havoc. Instead of saying, ‘Listen, you can have a small sign,’ they’ll just say, ‘OK, no sign.’ It’s cut and dried with them. ‘No sign!’ They don’t see outside the box.”

One of Kavanagh’s neighbours who submitted concerns to the city was happy with the sign restriction.

“We live on a very busy intersection, where all of the traffic goes down to Macdonald Drive Junior High,” said the neighbour, who asked not to be identified.

"It’s a sin to say it, but the decisions made here are up and down like a toilet seat." Tina Kavanagh

“If you’re here at anywhere between eight and nine in the morning, at noontime, or three o’clock, this is backlogged. … If you’ve got people parking right there, and if you’ve got people parking in front of our house here, then these people don’t see the crosswalk. We’ve already had two kids knocked down. We had an adult knocked down year before last, in the evening. We had a young fellow taken out of his sneakers a couple years ago, which is why the crosswalk was put there in the first place.”

If Kavanagh has an established clientele through word of mouth, she won’t need a sign, said the neighbour.

“Then it doesn’t devalue property, because if we went to sell it, someone doesn’t necessarily know there’s a home-based business next door.”

On Thursday, Breen said the sign restriction is one city council has imposed on other home-based businesses in the past.

“With home-based businesses, they’re treated a little bit differently, because you are in a residential area and there is some concern amongst neighbours that when you put signage out, you then really introduce the commercial aspect of that,” he said.

“You don’t want to have these and end up with signs all over the place.”

Breen said with the rising cost of office space and rent, he expects to see the number of home-based businesses continue to rise.

“You have to find a balance between home-based businesses and maintaining the residential integrity of the neighbourhood,” he said.

“I don’t think it has a significant impact on the business — in this particular case, it’s a business that’s by appointment. … If you’re going to have a business that requires signage and is going to be taking customers on a general basis, then it’s probably more conducive to a commercial area.”

Breen said given his expectation the city will see more home-business applications, he’s already directed city staff to review city policies on them.

“I get very, very few complaints about any of their operations, because they are low-impact operations.”

dmaceachern@thetelegram.com

Twitter: @TelegramDaniel

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Robert Ring
    December 19, 2013 - 14:38

    Here is a copy of an email I just sent to Councillor Danny Breen: Dear Councillor Breen, I'm writing regarding an article in the Telegram, which revealed that the owner of a home-based business is not permitted to put up a sign on her property identifying her business. http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2013-12-07/article-3534009/Sign-out/1 I read that you believe this rule should be applied to all home-based businesses. Bluntly put, I think your proposition is absolutely ridiculous, and I urge you to reconsider. I do not know the owners of this business, but I believe that the owner of a business, whether it is in a mainly residential area or not, should be permitted a sign that identifies the business. As an example of a "tasteful" sign in a primarily residential area, look at the new sign for the Mallard Cottage in Quidi Vidi Village. You are quoted as saying: “You have to find a balance between home-based businesses and maintaining the residential integrity of the neighbourhood”. While I agree with this statement, what you are proposing is certainly not a balance. Let me be clear that I am not arguing that there should be no restrictions on signs whatsoever, but to simply say that no sign is permitted, no matter how small, no matter now "nice," is a misguided approach. Respectfully, Robert Ring

  • B
    December 18, 2013 - 17:57

    That's just ridiculous. Let her have a small sign b'y!

  • Full disclosure
    December 08, 2013 - 18:46

    I think if you sell knowing there is a business next door and don't inform the purchaser your a crook. I don't see a sign hurting anyway, another set of people jealous to see someone else try to get ahead.

  • sue
    December 08, 2013 - 00:02

    LET HER HAVE A SMALL SIGN. THE LOGIC HERE IS CRAZY THAT A SIGN WILL ADD TO STUDENTS/ADULTS BEING HIT BY CARS. CLEARLY, THAT IS ALREADY A PROBLEM WITHOUT ANY SIGN. IT'S RIDICULOUS HOW ST. JOHN'S.CATERS TO THE ILLOGICAL CONCERNS OR COMPLAINTS OF CITY RESIDENTS. THERE IS NO TO LITTLE TRAFFIC IN THAT AREA ONCE SCHOOL IS STARTED AND SHORTLY AFTER DISMISSAL.

  • Marshall Art
    December 07, 2013 - 12:41

    Let's call a spade a spade; people who have a home based business and want to display a sign to identify their businesses, don't give a rat's ass about any concerns their neighbours might have, whether it's traffic congestion, people being knocked down in crosswalks, whatever. It's the 'me me me and to hell with you' syndrome. The neighbours have to rely on a bunch of wishy washy, blah blah blah, pompous ass councillors to use some common sense , which, unfortunately is all too uncommon.

    • Tina Kavanagh
      December 10, 2013 - 20:30

      Your comment regarding home based businesses don't give a rat's ass for their neighbours is so off the wall it's a shame you are so ignorant in these matters. I do care about the neighbours so give up the stereotyping Art! So if one of your family members decides to open a home based business you'll support it right? You have way too much time on your hands and maybe you could volunteer your time at the crosswalk during the lunch time hour so the children can make it safe across the street! Make use of your time helping the situation instead of complaining about it. This is my livelihood and to listen to you make derogatory comments about the St. John's councillors and my( Tina Kavanagh) me, me, me attitude. Your best bet is to say nothing and saw wood! . Wishy washy councillors... pompous ass councillors... I detect a lot of jealousy! Get a life and make sure you get your facts straight before you start typing!

  • W Bagg
    December 07, 2013 - 11:29

    once you get approval for the salon, just go back and ask for permission to add a 30 meter propane tank, that you need it to operate.........just tell them you didn't rea.lize you needed the tank when you submitted your first application..........no problem. Uh Oh, I meant to say sign, not 30 meter propane tank.

    • Tina Kavanagh
      December 10, 2013 - 20:36

      W Bagg I take it you have a wild imagination! Refer to the comment made to Art Marshall and it goes to you also. Nothing better to do with your time! How does a propane tank fit into this issue! Like I said you have a wild imagination!