• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Dave
    July 02, 2010 - 13:34

    Seems to me that these people are not very mature. The fact that they are both professors and psychologists is kind of scary. Grow up people.

  • Kimberly
    July 02, 2010 - 13:29

    This judge finally said what two independant reports have been trying to day - the Fagan is the root cause behind the problems that have plagued the town for the last 5 years.

    If anyone thinks he there for the residents, go ask the people who live next door to developers who have been given the go ahead when the regulations do not allow it. How would you like to have an excavator wake you up 6 feet from your bedroom window tomorrow?

    Kudos to Mr. Andrews for trying to at least get the rules followed. Just remeber - if he is sucessful with his appeals, that means the Council is NOT fiollowing the rules - the same rules that protect each of you from having an incinerator put in next door, for instance.

  • Dean
    July 02, 2010 - 13:29

    I am no layer but...I would be careful making a statement questioning a judges ruling especially by asking what was he smoking . Don't feel that hiding behind a fictitious name makes you untouchable, just ask the Halifax firefighters who made liabous remarks about the fire chief who are now being sued for defamation. The firefighters thought they could hide behind factitious names until the court ruled the paper had to release their names.

  • Philosopher
    July 02, 2010 - 13:29

    She admits to not being a clinical psychologist but yet goes ahead to try and make a diagnosis anyway. Her letter basically questions the man's sanity. It seems as though her letter was far more damaging than Fagan's. Ms. Andrews doesn't appear to be very professional to boot. What was this judge smoking?

  • Alison from PCSP
    July 02, 2010 - 13:29

    If only Fagan had has his wings clipped many years ago. He destroyed the literacy coalition. And this is not the first time he has written an employer to intimidate someone he doesn't like. He ATIPP'd his own Council 60 times while he was sitting on the last Council. His behaviour has caused senior staff to leave, other staff to go on stress leave, and still another to retire early. He threatens everyone who disagrees with him with lawsuits. This bully has to go! Wake up PCSP residents. You elected the wrong Mayor!

  • Joe fresh
    July 02, 2010 - 13:26

    Finally finally Finally. The shool yard bully got his just desserts.

    This man has exhibited this type behaviour his whole time on council. accusations , investigations, what is the coomon demoinator here.

    If you do not agree with Fagan he must destroy and discredit you, he is only happy if you stand in awe of him.

    Ask yourself why three of the three most senoir staff in PCSP have left in the last 6 months.

    And Muncipal Affairs??? Do an investigation, encourage opinions and testimony from Staff and Councillors. Then release this information contrary in my opinion to the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

    the judge got this one bang on

  • Rodney
    July 02, 2010 - 13:26

    Hey Arch from PCSP

    Why don't you post your real name next to those comments about senior staff. It's easy to spout off when you don't know what you are talking about. Personally I left for a career opportunity. However the toxic envriroment that exists at PCSP is well documented and is evidenced by your uninformed and cutting comments.

    Better yet, tell me in what way my staff didn't do things right and did whatever we felt like . Are you alleging wrong doing by staff ? Feel free to be specific so we can have some real fun!

    Rodney Cumby
    Former Town Manager
    PCSP

  • CMT
    July 02, 2010 - 13:23

    Kudos to you Emir for hold for holding Fagan accountable for his actions. You are right on the money with your comments. It's about time someone stood up to him. Good on you!

  • W
    July 02, 2010 - 13:21

    Sounds alot like Williams administration.........go provincial guys.

  • Reg
    July 02, 2010 - 13:20

    Well I guess Mr. Andrews will use this money to replenish his pot to file appeals against every decision the new town council makes that he does not agree with.

  • Resident
    July 02, 2010 - 13:20

    Well if she is so good and recognizing unusual behaviour, she should study her husband, former counsellor Mr Steve Andrews. He ran for mayor, lost with the least amount of votes, and has made it a fulltime job making life hard on the residents. He had his chance, the residents let him know we dont want him, but he is so bent on Mr Fagan he is making life miserable on the rest of us. This is more of a sign of a man that is paranoid, manipulative and vicious when he does not get his own way. As stated by Mrs. Andrews about Mr. Fagan. She should let her husband know that he is no different, in my non- clinical opinion. No I am not a professor of any kind, I just have common sense, and I also can identify unusual behaviour. Good luck with your new case study Mrs. Andrews, it looks like it may be a fulltime job.

  • tom
    July 02, 2010 - 13:16

    Former mayor Norm Collins also had the experience of having a nasty letter written to his employer when Bill Fagan was on council- a letter from a man who lives at the same address as Mr. Fagan. How low can you get? Glad to see that the judge in this case got it right.

  • Philosopher
    July 02, 2010 - 13:13

    Good thing you aren't a lawyer Dean, the courts would be even more screwed up than they already are.

  • Mary
    July 02, 2010 - 13:10

    The previous council did everything in their power to discredit Mr. Fagan. The people knew otherwise and he was voted in as Mayor. The people aren't listening now either.

    The previous council are always writing letters to the local paper complaining about and trying to discredit this council. The previous council are continuously appealing decisions of this council causing costly delays to the residents and unneeded work for council.

    When are the previous council going to figure out that nobody wanted you in council anymore and nobody is listening to your B.S now. Stop writing the letters to the local paper! Stop holding up permits by appealing everything that this council is doing! Stop wasting this council's time!!

    I know that it must be an aweful kick in the guts to receive the least amount of votes in the election but...suck it up. If your objective is to discredit this council enough so you'll all run again in the next election, then you'd better think again.

    These councillors are fair people working on behalf of the residents. They are well liked, well respected, and work for the people not against them.

    Mayor Fagan has met with more people from the community trying to resolve their problems than the entire past council did in their 4 year term. And ask any of those residents and they will never say that he is a paranoid, manipulative or vicious man. He is very well liked in the community. Ask those same residents what they think of the past council and the above words would only be mild.

    You're sore loosers still trying to control the Town as ex-councillors.

  • arch
    July 02, 2010 - 13:10

    Steve and Amir andrews are sore losers pure and simple! As for Joe Fresh why do you think three of the most senoir staff left? Because they knew they would have to start doing things right instead of doing whatever they felt like.

  • Ken
    July 02, 2010 - 13:08

    Ahh yes our so called brightest at their best.

  • Dave
    July 01, 2010 - 20:24

    Seems to me that these people are not very mature. The fact that they are both professors and psychologists is kind of scary. Grow up people.

  • Kimberly
    July 01, 2010 - 20:17

    This judge finally said what two independant reports have been trying to day - the Fagan is the root cause behind the problems that have plagued the town for the last 5 years.

    If anyone thinks he there for the residents, go ask the people who live next door to developers who have been given the go ahead when the regulations do not allow it. How would you like to have an excavator wake you up 6 feet from your bedroom window tomorrow?

    Kudos to Mr. Andrews for trying to at least get the rules followed. Just remeber - if he is sucessful with his appeals, that means the Council is NOT fiollowing the rules - the same rules that protect each of you from having an incinerator put in next door, for instance.

  • Dean
    July 01, 2010 - 20:17

    I am no layer but...I would be careful making a statement questioning a judges ruling especially by asking what was he smoking . Don't feel that hiding behind a fictitious name makes you untouchable, just ask the Halifax firefighters who made liabous remarks about the fire chief who are now being sued for defamation. The firefighters thought they could hide behind factitious names until the court ruled the paper had to release their names.

  • Philosopher
    July 01, 2010 - 20:16

    She admits to not being a clinical psychologist but yet goes ahead to try and make a diagnosis anyway. Her letter basically questions the man's sanity. It seems as though her letter was far more damaging than Fagan's. Ms. Andrews doesn't appear to be very professional to boot. What was this judge smoking?

  • Alison from PCSP
    July 01, 2010 - 20:16

    If only Fagan had has his wings clipped many years ago. He destroyed the literacy coalition. And this is not the first time he has written an employer to intimidate someone he doesn't like. He ATIPP'd his own Council 60 times while he was sitting on the last Council. His behaviour has caused senior staff to leave, other staff to go on stress leave, and still another to retire early. He threatens everyone who disagrees with him with lawsuits. This bully has to go! Wake up PCSP residents. You elected the wrong Mayor!

  • Joe fresh
    July 01, 2010 - 20:13

    Finally finally Finally. The shool yard bully got his just desserts.

    This man has exhibited this type behaviour his whole time on council. accusations , investigations, what is the coomon demoinator here.

    If you do not agree with Fagan he must destroy and discredit you, he is only happy if you stand in awe of him.

    Ask yourself why three of the three most senoir staff in PCSP have left in the last 6 months.

    And Muncipal Affairs??? Do an investigation, encourage opinions and testimony from Staff and Councillors. Then release this information contrary in my opinion to the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

    the judge got this one bang on

  • Rodney
    July 01, 2010 - 20:12

    Hey Arch from PCSP

    Why don't you post your real name next to those comments about senior staff. It's easy to spout off when you don't know what you are talking about. Personally I left for a career opportunity. However the toxic envriroment that exists at PCSP is well documented and is evidenced by your uninformed and cutting comments.

    Better yet, tell me in what way my staff didn't do things right and did whatever we felt like . Are you alleging wrong doing by staff ? Feel free to be specific so we can have some real fun!

    Rodney Cumby
    Former Town Manager
    PCSP

  • CMT
    July 01, 2010 - 20:09

    Kudos to you Emir for hold for holding Fagan accountable for his actions. You are right on the money with your comments. It's about time someone stood up to him. Good on you!

  • W
    July 01, 2010 - 20:04

    Sounds alot like Williams administration.........go provincial guys.

  • Reg
    July 01, 2010 - 20:04

    Well I guess Mr. Andrews will use this money to replenish his pot to file appeals against every decision the new town council makes that he does not agree with.

  • Resident
    July 01, 2010 - 20:02

    Well if she is so good and recognizing unusual behaviour, she should study her husband, former counsellor Mr Steve Andrews. He ran for mayor, lost with the least amount of votes, and has made it a fulltime job making life hard on the residents. He had his chance, the residents let him know we dont want him, but he is so bent on Mr Fagan he is making life miserable on the rest of us. This is more of a sign of a man that is paranoid, manipulative and vicious when he does not get his own way. As stated by Mrs. Andrews about Mr. Fagan. She should let her husband know that he is no different, in my non- clinical opinion. No I am not a professor of any kind, I just have common sense, and I also can identify unusual behaviour. Good luck with your new case study Mrs. Andrews, it looks like it may be a fulltime job.

  • tom
    July 01, 2010 - 19:57

    Former mayor Norm Collins also had the experience of having a nasty letter written to his employer when Bill Fagan was on council- a letter from a man who lives at the same address as Mr. Fagan. How low can you get? Glad to see that the judge in this case got it right.

  • Philosopher
    July 01, 2010 - 19:52

    Good thing you aren't a lawyer Dean, the courts would be even more screwed up than they already are.

  • Mary
    July 01, 2010 - 19:46

    The previous council did everything in their power to discredit Mr. Fagan. The people knew otherwise and he was voted in as Mayor. The people aren't listening now either.

    The previous council are always writing letters to the local paper complaining about and trying to discredit this council. The previous council are continuously appealing decisions of this council causing costly delays to the residents and unneeded work for council.

    When are the previous council going to figure out that nobody wanted you in council anymore and nobody is listening to your B.S now. Stop writing the letters to the local paper! Stop holding up permits by appealing everything that this council is doing! Stop wasting this council's time!!

    I know that it must be an aweful kick in the guts to receive the least amount of votes in the election but...suck it up. If your objective is to discredit this council enough so you'll all run again in the next election, then you'd better think again.

    These councillors are fair people working on behalf of the residents. They are well liked, well respected, and work for the people not against them.

    Mayor Fagan has met with more people from the community trying to resolve their problems than the entire past council did in their 4 year term. And ask any of those residents and they will never say that he is a paranoid, manipulative or vicious man. He is very well liked in the community. Ask those same residents what they think of the past council and the above words would only be mild.

    You're sore loosers still trying to control the Town as ex-councillors.

  • arch
    July 01, 2010 - 19:46

    Steve and Amir andrews are sore losers pure and simple! As for Joe Fresh why do you think three of the most senoir staff left? Because they knew they would have to start doing things right instead of doing whatever they felt like.

  • Ken
    July 01, 2010 - 19:43

    Ahh yes our so called brightest at their best.