Money from nothing

Brian
Brian Jones
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

The mortgage mayhem, gargantuan greed and resulting recession of 2008 should have forced the economic “experts” to cease their arrogant pontificating.

But the economic genies are still at it, spouting illusions and magic. It seems we’ll never stuff them back into their made-in-China bottles.

A quarter century has passed since “free trade” burst onto the political stage, shoving aside the other actors and becoming the lead character. Free trade has become dogma, an article of faith not to be questioned, akin to the virgin birth in the RC church or David Suzuki in the environmental church.

Free trade heretics have long been labelled as “protectionists,” which, as a moral judgment, is the 21st-century equivalent of being a 19th-century slave trader.

Occasionally, the hypocrisy and inherent irrationality of free-trade ideologues bubbles to the surface of their made-in-China pot.

This week, it came from the U.S., although it must be noted that, in any given week, it could arise in Canada, on the flipside of the coin/border.

U.S. President Barack Obama wants to spend $447 billion on schools, roads, bridges and buses. The intent isn’t necessarily to improve Americans’ lives — although it might do that — but to create jobs.

As usual with multibillion-dollar projects, it’s difficult to comprehend its magnitude. Think of it this way: $447 billion would put 298 Hummers in every driveway in David Suzuki’s pristine Vancouver neighbourhood.

The problem — other than exhaust fumes from 14.9 million Hummers — is that Canadian free traders are aghast.

Obama — recently nicknamed Bam Bam by one witty commentator — has it in his mind that the 447 billion American dollars will be spent in America to create jobs for Americans.

Obama’s proposal includes the proviso that the $447 billion must be used to purchase only goods and materials “produced in the United States.”

According to a Canadian Press report, the Canadian government opposes the “buy American” provisions of Bam Bam’s plan because they are … protectionist.

Maybe the White House missed the memo that we now live in a globalized world, which, in some people’s minds, means Obama should spend American taxpayers’ money to create jobs in, say, Canada or Mexico.

Stories such as this — and they are common, and regular — reveal the falsity of free-trade dogma. Capital and money zip across borders, but labour doesn’t. When capital and money pack their bags and move out, jobs are left behind, heartbroken and destitute.

Free-trade dogmatists avoid this unsavoury situation by declaring we are in the “Information Age” and now have a “knowledge economy.”

A computer in every classroom is swell, but there isn’t much thought given to the kids at the back of the class who aren’t likely to become information agers and who need those semi-skilled or unskilled jobs in a local factory. Too late — many of the places where Canadians and Americans used to make stuff are adorned with made-in-China “Closed” signs.

But back to Bam Bam. Free traders are stretching their logic if they think it makes sense to tell Obama to spend American “stimulus” money in Canada. The Republicans would eat him alive, adding cannibalism to all their other faults.

We’ve seen this sort of situation in Newfoundland.

Imagine the angry uproar that would have ensued if an offshore project hadn’t required a “Newfoundland component,” and had instead been entirely constructed in South Korea.

Free trade would be fine in an ideal world, between equal partners. But “I’ll trade one million of my widgets for one million of your widgets” is fundamentally different than “I’d like to buy one million of your widgets that I used to make myself.”

It’s hockey season. Parents, get shopping for those made-in-China skates, gloves, elbow pads, etc.

 

Brian Jones is a desk editor at The Telegram. He can be reached by email at bjones@thetelegram.com.

Organizations: RC church, Canadian Press, Republicans The Telegram

Geographic location: China, United States, Canada Vancouver Newfoundland South Korea.Free

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Clarity please
    September 25, 2011 - 12:06

    Brian Here's your article below in a nutshell .Bascially what you have here is a distinction between a natural market demand driving a free trade economy and an American government Make-Work project .Surely no honest Canadian could knock that effort .We Newfoundlanders do it constantly.The only hitch comes when suppliers outside the USA will want to bid on some very large supply contracts .Will they have the legal right to do so if all the supplies are found in the USA and teh labor is Amercian .I don't see a problem .If any reader highly tutored in economics and free trade does see aproblem, please inform us . ( U.S. President Barack Obama wants to spend $447 billion on schools, roads, bridges and buses. The intent isn’t necessarily to improve Americans’ lives — although it might do that — but to create jobs.Obama has it in his mind that the 447 billion American dollars will be spent in America to create jobs for Americans. Obama’s proposal includes the proviso that the $447 billion must be used to purchase only goods and materials “produced in the United States.” )

  • Terry Martin
    September 20, 2011 - 21:50

    What an ignorant article!!! I cannot believe that a well-reasoned economic theory that economists of all ages and political colours will wholeheartedly agree upon is compared to a "dogma"... Mr. Jones does well, however, by keeping to himself his explanations as to the inherent irrationality of free trade... could it be because there is no reasonable/rational way to justify protectionism other than resorting to emotional, if misguided, calls to keep the jobs of a given sector of the economy? Absolutely painful reading! I am also wodering what his truly poor understanding of economics (and how the world works in general) would lead him to react to an article like this, which was publised in this paper today. For the good of NL, I hope that Chinese business people are not as ignorant and bigoted as Mr. Jones appears to be .... http://www.thetelegram.com/Business/2011-09-15/article-2748664/Chinese-demand-for-iron-ore-to-keep-prices-high/1

  • Daphne
    September 16, 2011 - 10:43

    Great column Brian. "Free trade" is only that when it suits the Americans. Otherwise, protectionism is the order of the day.

  • Wow
    September 16, 2011 - 10:08

    Looks like our boy Brian doesn't understand free trade or probably any kind of agreement.

  • Chantal
    September 16, 2011 - 08:29

    So, what does David Suzuki have to do with it? Can't help getting in a few cheap shots, eh, Brian? You didn't even mention the Muslims.