Lies and the lying liars who tell them

Peter
Peter Jackson
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

I cannot tell a lie. The title of this column is stolen from U.S. Sen. Al Franken’s book about the Republican Party and its unofficial media mouthpiece, Fox News.

Some may think the U.S. invented the political lie, though the practice is as old as politics itself. Still, some of the best fibs come from south of the border.

There was former president Bill Clinton’s famous line, “I did not have sex with that woman,” along with the eerily similar whopper last month from former presidential candidate Herman Cain: “I have never sexually harassed anyone.”

Then there’s George W. Bush telling Americans, “I’m spending less than Bill Clinton.”

The editorial on this page laments how the Canadian electorate seems to be developing more tolerance for less-than-honest statements from our leaders. This is alarming, because cynicism and apathy can only lead to even worse behaviour, and undercut the foundations of our democracy.

We expect politicians to avoid the unhealthy temptations that come with public office, but we’re not naïve enough to think it won’t happen from time to time. All we can do is remain ever vigilant, and ask those found culpable to own up and move on.

As the editorial states, however, Conservative house leader Peter Van Loan has taken a different tack. He suggests lies are merely expressions of free speech.

In Van Loan’s world, for example, International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda can order her staff to insert the word “not” in a funding order for an aid group, and then tell a Commons committee she knew nothing about it. Free speech reigns.

And now we have Defence Minister Peter MacKay’s continued insistence that his Cormorant helicopter ride out of a fishing hole last year was a planned exercise — despite clear documented evidence to the contrary.

MacKay, of course, is the son of Elmer MacKay, one of former prime minister Brian Mulroney’s senior ministers.

In Mulroney’s day, at least, ministers were usually turfed from cabinet for bad behaviour — or they dutifully fell on their swords. And for most of Mulroney’s tenure, there seemed to be a steady exodus.

Here’s how a 2005 CBC News backgrounder summed it up:

“First there was Robert Coates, who stepped down as defence minister in 1985 after it was revealed that he had visited a strip club in West Germany. … Communications Minister Marcel Masse left over an alleged violation of the Canada Elections Act (he was later exonerated), followed closely by (Fisheries Minister) John Fraser.”

Fraser had ignored warnings from inspectors and allowed tainted cans of tuna to hit store shelves.

The litany continues:

In 1986, Sinclair Stevens stepped down over a controversial

$2.6-million loan to a family company. André Bissonnette, the minister of state for transport, resigned in 1987 over alleged involvement in land speculation. Roch La Salle left cabinet the same year after being charged with demanding a bribe  from businesses seeking government favours. Those charges were later dropped.

Supply and Services Minister Michel Coté lost his post in 1988 over conflict of interest allegations, says the CBC article, and Bernard Valcourt stepped down in 1989 after pleading guilty to impaired driving.

Jean Charest left cabinet after trying to talk to a judge about an ongoing case. And Housing Minister Alan Redway made the mistake of joking about having a gun while boarding a flight in Ottawa.

Of course, you might conclude that Brian Mulroney had a bad habit of courting rogues and scoundrels for higher office. Perhaps.

But there’s a more important conclusion.

When you’ve clearly disgraced the office you hold, it’s time to step down. In the old days, they seemed to understand that.

Not so today.

In Stephen Harper’s government, with rare exception, the rule of thumb can be summed up in three words: deny, deny, deny.

 

Peter Jackson is The Telegram’s

commentary editor. Email: pjackson@thetelegram.com.

Organizations: Republican Party, CBC News, Conservative house International Co Commons committee

Geographic location: U.S., West Germany, Canada

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Peter Jackson
    December 08, 2011 - 14:33

    Thank you, Mike. And my humble apologies to Mr. MacKay Sr. The text has been edited to eliminate the premature obituary.

  • Mike
    December 08, 2011 - 14:15

    "MacKay, of course, is the son of the late Elmer MacKay" The rumours of his demise are greatly exaggerated.

  • Doug Smith
    December 08, 2011 - 10:06

    Yea, he said nothing about the Pacific Scandal either -- or Airbus....

  • Allan Smith
    December 07, 2011 - 17:04

    Funny how this so called "commentary editior" neglected to mention all the Liberal scandals of the past and focused solely on the Conservatives and PC's. Worse yet, he quotes Al Franken and disparages FOX news!!!! Man, you lefties hate to see those on the right of center get on top don't you. Your yellow journalism makes me ill.

  • Scott Free
    December 07, 2011 - 10:59

    Re-publican, re-form, whatever....sounds a little re-tarted to me. The federal Con Party is a secret society; much like our democracy-turned-Dunderdale dictatorship, a direct decendant of the Danny Damage Era, here on the rock. Lies, deceit, coverup; hallmarks of the Republicans of the North Party. Remember electorate, politicians have two goals; get elected; get re-elected; repeat, repeat. Democracy is dead at both our provincial level and at the federal level.

  • Lane
    December 07, 2011 - 09:51

    I agree whole-heartedly that every single person named in Jackson's article lacked the integrity and honesty we should demand from our politicians. But it's really unfortunate that Jackson chose to turn his article into a political diatribe by singling out only Conservative (and former Progressive Conservative) politicians. What about Liberal PM Jean Chretien funnelling taxpayers' money into a golf course and hotel in which he held a financial interest? (He denied and did not resign.) What about the outright criminality of the Sponsorship Scandal, which saw taxpayers' money funnelled into the Liberal Party? (The Minister overseeing the program, Alfonso Gagliano, denied and did not resign, and was rewarded by Chretien with a plum diplomatic post.) What about Liberal Defence Minister Art Eggleton being ruled in contempt of Parliament by the Speaker of the House of Commons for misleading parliament about whether Canadian Special Forces troops had been deployed to Afghanistan? (He denied and did not resign, and was rewarded with an appointment to the Senate, where he remains today.) What about former Liberal Immigration Minister Judy Sgro and her special treatment of an immigrant who supported her campaign? The list goes on and on. Funny how Jackson just plain forgot about the entire corrupt Chretien era.

  • Michael Broughton
    December 07, 2011 - 09:48

    Anyone remember 2006, when Harper stood up in Parliament and stated: "There’s going to be a new code on Parliament Hill. Bend the rules, you will be punished; break the law, you will be charged; abuse the public trust, you will go to prison." Someone needs to go back and find the original video feed, because I have this feeling that he had his fingers crossed behind his back....

  • Herb Morrison
    December 07, 2011 - 07:41

    Well said, Mr. Jackson. Perhaps the fact that politicians openly deny inappropriate behaviour, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is because, within society as a whole, there is a greater tolerance for so-called bad behaviour that twenty years would result in an individual or group facing either social scorn or, in more serious situations, legal action. As Bob Dylan sang: "The times they are a changing."