Another day, another scandal

Pam
Pam Frampton
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Oda's spending spree just another unethical episode we'll soon forget

"Leadership is a privilege to better the lives of others. It is not an opportunity to satisfy personal greed."

- Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki

A poll commissioned in February by the Manning Group, a right-wing Calgary-based think-tank, found that 90 per cent of respondents felt politicians are more concerned with money than people.

What a curious result. Why the cynicism, people? Could it be the double-dipping? The plum patronage appointments for pals? The constituency allowance spending scandals? The posh rides on the taxpayers' dime? (Quick - someone hail me a helicopter.) The double billings? The spending sprees in ministers' ridings?

In certain political spheres, it's getting to the point where elected members who display an ethical streak are the exception, not the rule.

And we are all too apathetic about it, with more than one-third of us not even bothering to vote in the last federal election.

Revelations about Bev Oda's spendthrift tour of London in June 2011 grabbed headlines this week, with the news that she rejected her five-star conference hotel in favour of the super-swanky Savoy, and then hired a limo to drive her wherever she wanted to go.

This, at a time when the federal government is talking about belt-tightening, and public sector workers across the country are either getting pink slips or dreading getting them.

As Ontario NDP MP Charlie Angus said to his Conservative colleagues in the House of Commons on Monday, "Is someone over there not embarrassed by her behaviour? Will someone stand up and apologize to the hard-working Canadian taxpayers? She is living like a queen off their backs."

Penny-pincher

Queen Bev has apparently shucked off her previous persona - the one she wore back when she was known for rejecting grant requests from international development agencies that helped the poor.

That was in February 2011, when Globe and Mail reporters Campbell Clark and Daniel LeBlanc were describing her as "a small-c conservative, with a parsimonious touch, who, according to one official, buys clothes at discount store Winners, and viewed every expenditure 'with suspicion' - and was hesitant to approve grants for recipients that didn't espouse conservative values."

That parsimonious touch has apparently given way to her sense of entitlement - the notion that while five-star hotels are fine for lesser folk, Conservative cabinet ministers can command accommodations fit for royalty.

Funny how someone with "conservative values" can spend someone else's money so liberally.

I couldn't help but notice in Tuesday's Telegram that two pages past the story on Oda's glitzy London trip, was a story from Corner Brook about federal employees bracing for the possible end of their careers.

One of them, whose unit at the employment insurance processing centre is being shut down, said she might be given the option of moving to St. John's, but that means her husband would have to look for a new job and they likely wouldn't get enough for their west coast house to be able to afford one in the capital city.

"Who wants to start over at 47?" Kim Pike asked. "My options boil down to I'm better off staying here and making $10 an hour."

Those are the kinds of gut-wrenching life decisions ordinary mortals have to make, Ms. Oda - not whether to stay at a ritzy hotel versus an opulent one, or Moët & Chandon versus Dom Pérignon.

Here today, gone tomorrow

What saddens me the most about the latest Oda scandal is that it will blow over in no time at all.

It's already happened with Peter MacKay, Vic Toews, Stockwell Day, Tony Clement and the list goes on and on.

Yesterday it was fighter jets, today it's over-the-top orange juice, tomorrow it will be another Harper cabinet minister and another shocking scandal. How quickly we forget.

Oda's political pals leapt to her defence, with House Leader and Conservative MP Peter Van Loan noting that, "The minister, of course, has repaid the costs in question."

Of course she has - 10 months after the fact, and only then because the media was asking questions. That scrutiny also prompted her to apologize on Tuesday.

"The expenses are unacceptable," she said in the House of Commons.

Yes they are. But what's even more unacceptable is that any politician would think it was OK to waste Canadian taxpayers' money on themselves, especially when they're out there slashing programs and services and people's jobs in the name of austerity.

Let's be honest here: Bev Oda did not repay her outrageous expenses - as Van Loan suggested - because "our government believes very much that all ministers must respect taxpayer dollars."

She repaid the money because news of her splurging got out and she was being vilified for it.

But Oda, like so many of her greedy political compatriots, will wait for this transgression's dust to settle and then she'll go on about her business, lapping up luxury on our dime.

And unless we keep loudly condemning such behaviour - and by actually giving enough of a damn to make it to the ballot box when the next election rolls around - we might as well sit back and brace ourselves for more of the same.

Because for Harper and his cronies, clearly it's easier to tighten someone else's belt than it is their own.

Pam Frampton is a columnist and The Telegram's associate managing editor. She can be reached by email at pframpton@thetelegram.com. Twitter: pam_frampton

Organizations: Manning Group, House of Commons, Globe and Mail Dom Pérignon

Geographic location: London, Savoy, Corner Brook St. John's

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • All Government dealings should be Transparent
    April 30, 2012 - 08:45

    BEV said "And to think that these leeches, blood suckers go on to get private jobs! No one should hire these politicians". BEV My Dear Nobody has to hire these politicians because once they get in power, some of them, not all, they are not only protected by Political Patronage, but the Audacious ones take control over our natural resources for their own benefit and that has gone on in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador forever. If you think some politicians are scamming their Government Expense Accounts, if you and I could only have a purview of how our Natural Resources of Newfoundland and Labrador have been scammed and exploited to the point where we the province and its people failed to thrive economically for the past 63 years, despite the vast natural resource base we have had exploited for the benefit of others, we would start a full-blown revolution today. Some ex politicians will make, hundred of Millions of dollars over the next 57 years on the Muskrat Falls Project. It has been going on forever in our province, but nobody, because of the lack of transparency in government dealings in our province, was aware of it. Now let me get this straight I am not against the development of our natural resources by anyone from this province or from anywhere else, but what I am against is when the resources are exploited and the province of Newfoundland and Labrador does not get its fair share. It is time for everything in the present Muskrat Falls Contract, to be exposed to the electorate of Newfoundland and Labrador, so we know who is involved and why, since given the information we have been apprised of so far shows that our province will not be faring very well with regard to the revenues from that project. In other words why will the ratepayers and taxpayers have to foot the mortgage to fund this project, while the developers who are ex politicians and bureaucrats will get Hundreds of Millions, if not a Billion dollars and the commercial customers will be getting power, at some say 4 cents per kilowatt hour, power that will cost our province and its people over 20 cents per kilowatt hours. I and, I am sure the rest of the NL electorate, want to know all the details and maybe we can come to some sort of consensus. Everthing should be exposed, we should not be in the dark about anything.

  • Bev
    April 29, 2012 - 13:57

    And to think that these leeches, blood suckers go on to get private jobs! No one should hire these politicians. They are a drain on society. No wonder they buy votes and elections! Time we cut their expenses, salaries and pensions. Like they cut the public's. Fair is fair. The system is set for cheaters and should be changed to control spending/capped right down to their elections. It attracks a lot crooks and Looters. Time to change Legislation and demand change! Complaining does nothing. We also need committees overlooking their spending. Committees with teeth to throw them out when breeches occur. Just as the public would be sued and fired for this type of behaviour. They are doing a job. We are their bos. If I were PM, The first thing I would do is make these changes. Way overdue!! Great article. Keep writing it and get out to Canadians. Very Import!

  • Harvey
    April 29, 2012 - 08:50

    To But...But !!! In 2006 I voted for Harper and his ilk because of the sponsorship scandal...I voted that way because I thought that the Harperites would bring about change that would prevent such scandalous action!!! What a let down !!! Pam, your article is worth the read and maybe it will ring bells three years from now . I am already beginning to believe that Mr. Mulcair will be the next Canadian Prime Minister.

  • But... but...
    April 28, 2012 - 10:38

    ...what about the Liberals' sponsorship scandal??? Remember? The sponsorship scandal? Why does no one mention the Liberal sponsorship scandal? Never mind the Tories’ so-called scandals... they are non-stories made up by the left-wing media. The Liberals were involved in a sponsorship scandal and no one remembers? I blame the liberals... I mean FIBerals because they were behind the sponsorship scandal and they FIB. And the NDP is worse because they are twice as scandalous as the FIBereals and I won't even bother pointing out why. It's obvious! Anyone who says differently is on the side of terrorists and child pornographers.

  • David
    April 28, 2012 - 10:18

    Gagliano, Dingwall, Corbeil, Guite......same old movie. The sun shall rise tomorrow, and the Canadian taxpayer will be fleeced again.

  • Tamara
    April 28, 2012 - 10:12

    Country Club Bev should be fired to write a book called "Travel the World on someone else's Dime."

  • Holden
    April 28, 2012 - 09:26

    Nice to see such inciteful commentary by the Globe and Mail. It shows me they are consistent (ie. M Wente). It is better to highlite these types of excess at the end of a mandate. I remember the decline of Brian Peckford (cigars and limos).