Controversy is nipping at Penashue's heels

Bob Wakeham
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

So I’m up in the woods the other day, standing over a still-twitching rabbit, the first kill of the new season, when my hunting partner — characteristically without context — asks me what I think of Peter Penashue’s ignominious stint thus far in the federal cabinet.

Two points worth making here: for sure, Jim didn’t use the pretentious word “ignominious” — that’s not his style; and the question was rhetorical, just his excuse to launch into one of his obscenity-laced, colourful rants about politicians or anything else, for that matter, that crosses his mind.

And, as is his wont, my friend of three decades decided to utilize the scene before us to illustrate his never ambiguous views on current affairs.

Pointing to my beagle Tandy, who was, at that point, proudly sniffing the dying rabbit and gloating over having done his invaluable part in dispatching Bugs Bunny to Heaven for Hares, my buddy, the hunter-turned-pundit, remarked: “You know somethin’, Tandy there could do a better job as a cabinet minister than that Penashue fella.”

And warming to the subject at hand, and invigorated by my laughter, he added: “At least Tandy there growls at someone he should be mad at, or tries to bite the arse of whoever it is who’s given him that reason to snarl.”

For sure, there was no disagreeing with the assessment: Penashue’s career in cabinet has been a disappointing one, and that’s a massive understatement; even that rabbit, all shot to pieces in the middle of a cutover in the Flatrock woods, had at least had a good run before he was brought down.  Penashue, on the other hand (or the other paw), came out of the gate stumbling and bumbling, trying almost from the get-go to defend the indefensible Stephen Harper while he, Penashue’s benefactor, continually put Newfoundland in the crosshairs.

And Penashue has never recovered.

Now, as everyone in the country knows (even Tandy seemed to sense who we were talking about, looking up briefly from his palliative care prey to nod an acknowledgment), the last couple of weeks have seen Penashue’s political career shattered beyond repair with the most recent revelations about his habit of playing fast and loose with electioneering rules.

I believe it was the first time since he moved to Ottawa that Penashue earned a prominent spot in Peter Mansbridge’s lineup and plenty of space in papers like The Globe and Mail, but it was obviously not the kind of publicity he had in mind when he decided to exploit his well-earned, solid reputation as an Innu leader and enter the compromising world of federal politics.   

The reports that he had overspent his election expenses by several thousand dollars were bad enough. But they were exacerbated by the fact that Provincial Airways had written off thousands of dollars more he spent traipsing around Labrador as if he were Craig Dobbin. That kind of cosy, financial arrangement with any corporation isn’t healthy, of course. Plus, the free air time above the Labrador skies gave Penashue an unfair advantage over Todd Russell, the Liberal candidate he defeated by a handful of votes.

Yes, it certainly painted a disastrous picture, but equally embarrassing was Penashue’s lame and pathetic excuses for the wrong-doing. I shuffled my feet as I watched Penashue on CBC Television making awkward attempts, with no success, to dismiss his misuse of election finances as the mistakes of a rookie politician.

I’m quite sure federal candidates are given enough information — training, in fact — to ensure they obey the rules set down to provide, to whatever extent possible, a level playing field for all who put their name on a ballot paper.

So Penashue has no one to blame but himself. Trying to write it off as a misunderstanding is like me trying to convince Revenue Canada that I was unaware of this or that income tax rule. The tax boys and girls don’t want to hear it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Penashue was caught. And it’s amazing to me that he hasn’t done the honourable thing and resigned. After all, that’s a word people would use freely, I’m sure, when describing Penashue in his former role as a national chief of the Innu Nation.

What didn’t shock me, of course, was Harper’s dismissal of the entire issue.

Harper has so much power these days that he has made himself immune to criticism.

His arrogance is palpable.

I’ll give Tandy the last word here: Agrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!


Bob Wakeham has spent 40 years

as a journalist in Newfoundland and Labrador. He can be reached by email at

Organizations: Globe and Mail, Revenue Canada

Geographic location: Newfoundland and Labrador, Ottawa

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • nba
    October 28, 2012 - 09:31

    Bob Wakeham and his dog Tandy should know whether it be Peter, Fabian or whoever was NL Conservative MP for the best interest of NL in a Harper Government they would have to adapt the philosophy "keep your friends close and your enemies closer". Bob and dog let's not forget Harper is the enemy!

  • Eli
    October 27, 2012 - 20:02

    David, you ever hear of Harper's minister Tony Clement? Now tell me again this is the most efficient, effective & least corrupt government in the last 3 decades. Then, there's the Atlantic Accord. One of us is on the wrong planet my good man.

  • Anna
    October 27, 2012 - 17:03

    Bob, yours is the first column I look to read on Saturdays as I enjoy your wit and your no nonsense tell it like it attitude. Please though, no more references to dead rabbits, some of us don't need or want to know about your hunting days. Penanshue will be like Bev Oda one of these days, getting his marching orders to resign for family reasons. I am just hoping it will be sooner than later.

  • rok
    October 27, 2012 - 16:30

    My good man, unless the sheriff comes knocking there's no way a polititian will resign his overly high paycheck.

  • Winston Adams
    October 27, 2012 - 09:36

    Strange, I dreamed about Harper last night. Not a good sign. I dreamed we were in conversation, like buddies. Understand now , I don't like Harper. He was telling me that he had come into a significant inheritance, from his mother's estate, but that she had set it up so that he couldn't get it until he was 50. He figured his mother was wise in this. Wouldn't many of a younger age squander the money? He felt this was prudent. I seldom remember dreams, and seems I had other thought of Harper, between moments of sleep and a little awake. There was Harper, playing his panio and singing a John Lennon song. Now I much loved John Lennon's music, and his wish for peace, not war. So, I'm thinking- Harper can't be all bad, after all, he likes Lennon. And there was Harper, in other dream snippit, saying no the the sale of Alberta oil companies to foreign countries. And saying that drilling in the Artic is ok. And maybe yes , maybe no on the Muskrat guarantee. Not really a nightmare, but surely there is better things to dream. Now they say dreams is a way one's mind tries to reconcile things. And in the end I figured I had Harper figured out. He's all about financial discipline. The economy -stupid. And is he not the darling of the world - giving Canada a strong economy in a world in tormoil. Fast track environmental reviews? No problem. Gut environmental laws? Done. Afraid that voters will say this is too much? Not at all. Turn a blind eye to improper actions by his Ministers? Of course. Knows that the majority will concur, since they're better off ? Certainly. So there it was. Harper analysized and understood. And somewhere in those snippits were the thoughts about indiffernce. That indifference was worse than anger, and worse than hatred, as those things can cause a response, often a useful response. But indifference is no response. I had read that on a local website, just before bedtime last night. So that thought was there too to reconcile. And I felt I understood it. And that is why Harper remains in power, though not popular. Indifference. Indifference describes the mass. Everyone , almost , is indifferent. And that's how my mind works. When dealing with dreams anyway.

    • david
      October 27, 2012 - 12:04

      It's sad really...the word "Harper hasd been co-opted by the Liberals and their briandead zombie cult, the media, and the small-minded diaspora, as a slur. Why? Simply becasue it precludes having to say anytihng fact-based or substantive to get a chuckle from the equally stunned. The record shows that his has been one of the most effective, efficient, and least corrupt federal governments in the past 3 decades, at least. And we entirely inconsequential lot here in Newfoundland are particularly POed, simply because Danny instructed us to be......sad, pathetic and costly. It is simply a "mistake" of democracy that he wins, a terrible and dsmaning indictment of the electoral system....that previously went totally undetected, lo these past hundred years. For gawd sakes, grow up.