• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • crista
    June 25, 2013 - 10:25

    To; the the writers of comments and the readers of articles.The definition and the meaning of question mark:1.A punctuation (?) indicating a question 2.used to express doubt or uncertainty about something: there's a question mark over his future.: synonyms query interrogation point.And if you have a problem with that go talk to your Government and not only just your Government???? and do what you do best????

  • saelcove
    June 24, 2013 - 09:52

    Where has everyone been, Nalcor is the government

  • Cyril Rogers
    June 24, 2013 - 05:15

    Mr. Wangersky, it has already happened here. The government's Bill 29...... and its handicapping of the PUB....... were clearly designed to stymie public opposition and hide information from us, the real shareholders of NALCOR. We are the ones who will keep that monstrosity afloat down the road, either through excessive hydro rates....... or in continued injections of funds from the public treasury. We will never know the truth of the travesty that is Muskrat Falls until both NALCOR and this administration are exposed...when the ugly true cost is revealed. Sadly, by then, it will be too late to stop it.

  • crista
    June 23, 2013 - 17:53

    Reading your article and the way it is wrote and not dismissing what is in your article????how can Nalcor be part owners of oil field investments???? being directly involved with the Government and have shareholders and investors and be a Crown corporation???? and the minister bring down special project orders and carry on with the project knowing it is a guaranteed loan that has to be paid back and it looks like it is being undisclosed not only to the public it is also being undisclosed to the opposition if what is being said is true???? and Nalcor had to go and settle a dispute when some one that was dismissed from there job????the projects already has the go ahead and it is passed in legislation and signed and you speak of the law society and then there is the bar society and you say the public utilities board did not have enough information and the Government is suppose to be Nalcor's Government???? could some one explain what is gone on and what is going on for what you are talking about in your article???? how can any one say it is plain and simple???? speaking of your article????

    • david
      June 24, 2013 - 07:43

      You really like question marks....it makes you appear to be a bit flaky, so I didn't read your post. And brevity works.

    • Eli
      June 24, 2013 - 09:30

      David didn't like Crista's note, didn't read it(?) and still makes his own comment. Who opens his cage in the morning and leaves him unsupervised?

    • Redgrave
      June 24, 2013 - 12:28

      Please give your answers in the form of a question as on Jeopardy. Then perhaps we can make sence of it all.

    • david
      June 24, 2013 - 14:14

      Eli likes to tell people what David said about Crista's post. Your turn.

  • Foghorn Leghorn
    June 22, 2013 - 09:14

    Plain and simple - You would never let the fox guard the hen house!