Frank Coleman was never meant to be a politician

Randy Simms
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Frank Coleman is gone. He left the political stage as quickly as he had claimed it. The businessman turned politician found himself in a unique position. No one expected that he would win the leadership of the PC party without a fight, but he did. That he would leave before spending even one day in office came as a total shock.

Frank Coleman.
— Photo by Joe Gibbons/The Telegram

The photo of him which graced the front page of this paper Tuesday morning will become the iconic image of his short-lived time in politics. A solitary man walking away from a dream.  

When he took the picture, photographer Joe Gibbons could not have known it would become the iconic symbol of this intense time in the political life of the province. It appeared below a rather subdued headline which simply read, “Coleman walks away.” The award-winning photographer has an eye for this kind of work, though, and he captured a moment in time that will define Coleman’s quick exit from the political arena.  

The news conference Coleman held to announce his decision to leave was brief. He told reporters that he had to go because of pressing family matters. He did not elaborate.

“I know after this past week that I can no longer offer the undivided focus and energy that I feel would be required of me in this role,” he said. He felt that continuing would do a disservice to the PC party and the province.  

Coleman provided no information regarding the family matter that took him out of the political spotlight. He said this was one area of privacy that was his to keep and he intended to do just that. He said it was a personal family matter involving his immediate family.  

As is so often the case, the rumour mill will now fill the information void. Everything from terminal illness to shady business dealings will be trotted out to explain his sudden departure. If there is a family crisis looming, it will not be long before it’s reported by someone somewhere. Getting out in front of these things is always the best policy, but even at the time of his leaving, Coleman refused to accept the wisdom of this approach.

Let’s be honest. Frank Coleman was never meant to be a politician. He is a quiet man given more to the politics of the business deal and the boardroom than to the art of politics and the cabinet table. Why we insist that anyone who can make a lot of money is the best choice to lead our province is beyond me. Using the term “successful businessperson” to imply political competence leaves me cold. The skill sets required are completely different.

Protecting the bottom line is important, but government is all about serving people, not growing profits. I’m not sure when the idea of running government like a business took hold in this country but what it’s produced so far is a business community with more money then at any time in its history while our need for expanded public services goes without. And in the face of looming deficits and government cutbacks, we still seem to buy into the belief that cutting taxes will somehow grow the economy and create more jobs. Surely the past 10 years have put the lie to that nonsense.

Frank Coleman was a political rookie who found himself playing in some big-league politics and, to borrow a hockey metaphor, they skate faster and hit harder in the NHL then they do in the minor leagues. Some people will think he was treated unfairly and he leaves the ice bruised and beaten. That picture of him walking away, shoulders slumped, hand in pocket, oozes the word defeat. That photo tells us you shouldn’t enter the arena unless you’re prepared to play.

Amazing as it may sound, Frank Coleman’s departure will give the PCs some new life. Soon there will be a new leadership race with new faces and a convention to run with all of the excitement of a political race. The Coleman interlude will be forgotten. Maybe that’s why he appears so sad in that iconic picture of his time in the limelight.

You know who’s really sad to see him go? Dwight Ball.

Randy Simms is a political commentator and broadcaster. He can be reached at

Organizations: NHL

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Yawn
    January 09, 2015 - 07:37


  • Edwin Charles
    June 25, 2014 - 22:33

    All these attributes for Frankie after he has walked away. Where were they before? If he had any political sense, or any sense at all, he would never had ended up being the fool that he is.

  • Yvonne
    June 24, 2014 - 01:38

    A wise man will speak when he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something." No matter how loud you try to shout Simms you won't convince us that FC was defeated. We lost a great leader for the province but not forgotten and certainly not defeated. He took this province by storm, no other contester brave enough to run against him, he made a choice to lead, and earned his place. But a man who puts family first and lays his dreams aside for his children and family, is a man who will leave a legacy in more than just the business and political arena. Sure, he happens to be an award winning public speaker, business man, who has been asked to be a part of many organizations boards and companies, and ambassador for other countries (try being informed not just opinionated) but more importantly he has remarkable and rare qualities and values as we've seen. The type of leader you'd want to follow even if he has no "position." What astounds me is you shudder at the thought of a businessman this “political rookie” leading this province, but then what makes you so sure any of these ripened politicians would make a good leader? Leaders are not as we often think people that go along with big crowds following them but those who go and aren't afraid to go their own way without even looking to see if anyone is following. Good and successful business leaders like FC we know can at least create a vision, articulate it, own it, and drive it to completion and this province could definitely have used some of that.

    • Henry
      March 21, 2015 - 08:15

      Its to bad these attributes would be wasted on the defunct "Progressive Conseravtives"......

  • Petertwo
    June 23, 2014 - 06:31

    Perhaps it would have been appropriate before Frank Coleman stepped down to make these comments about him. To do so, - after he made the decision, which speaks well for the man's honesty , a rare quality today - could very well indicate that some columnists and other folk ought to follow his example!

    • george p b
      June 23, 2014 - 17:51

      Time will tell if his "family matter" is valid or not...Corner Brook is a small town eh.....

  • Barbara Whelan
    June 22, 2014 - 16:24

    Give the man a break!

  • Henry
    June 22, 2014 - 12:26

    I agree with this article in every way. Mr. Coleman was doomed from the start of this farce. Mr. Coleman lacked the political experience and backbone to continue..

  • Laughable
    June 21, 2014 - 09:45

    Now we got Kent - Davis - Johnny looking to become the leader of the PC's party, Men of no " Back Bone ", do we need people like those to stand up for " Us"?

  • Harvey
    June 21, 2014 - 09:12

    Let's be honest. We never were told why Randy Simms no longer works with VOCM. Mr. Coleman needs his privacy as well.

  • Nit Picker
    June 21, 2014 - 08:55

    ... more money THAN at any time... Business experience is at least as important to politicians as grammar is to writers.

  • Scott R
    June 21, 2014 - 07:17

    Mr Simms, Is it Mr Coleman wasn't meant to be a politicians. Or Dwight Ball? that the question, Now when its come to the contract Humber Valley Paving had with Government, That one thing, But lets say your the Leader of the " Opposition ", who found its necessary, to pay people to call into the radio show, complaining about this contract, just to tear this man down. Just saying, you tell me who the better of the two? Mr Simms, PC's was on the right track, to get a leader for the party, by going outsides. Hope they stick with that decision.

  • Laughable
    June 21, 2014 - 06:53

    Randy, There not one MHA's on the Government side, who had the " Chestnuts " to run, They are using Mr Williams has excuse, not to.