Premier makes curious cabinet gamble



Russell Wangersky
Published on August 24th, 2010
Published on August 24th, 2010
Russell Wangersky RSS Feed

I was away on vacation last week, so I missed hearing about the latest pronouncement from the Oracle at Randy.

Topics :
Atlantic Lottery Corporation , British Columbia , Ontario

In other words, I didn’t find out right away about the throwaway comment from Premier Danny Williams on VOCM’s “Open Line” that he personally didn’t support the idea of having the Atlantic Lottery Corporation run an Internet-based gambling business in this province. I also missed Williams’ glib pronouncement that, essentially, he was but one person at the cabinet table, and cabinet would be the body to decide whether the Internet scheme would go ahead.

Now, leave aside the strange phenomenon we have in this province of premiers going on open-line shows to simply drop pearls of government policy direction, and instead have a look at the curious position that Williams has now put the remainder of his cabinet in.

British Columbia was the first province to announce that it was going to find its way into the lucrative world of running online poker games through its provincial lottery corporation. The Atlantic Lottery Corporation (ALC) came next, followed by Ontario. Essentially, the poker games — and other offerings — would be software-limited to residents of the particular provinces involved, and the lottery corporations, highlighting “responsible” gambling, would find some way to keep the gambling-addicted and underaged users off their systems. In other places, it’s been cast as the good guys taking over a bad business from the bad guys. It raises, of course, the question of whether government would make a better pimp or narcotic-pusher than the ordinary criminal element as well, but that’s probably for another Throne Speech, where we can become Masters of Our Own Downfall (TM).

While the ALC is very much on side, individual Atlantic provinces have to decide whether they want to “protect” their particular populaces from evil online gambling sites. Despite being very much up to speed on how much money the province would make from the Internet gambling business, cabinet ministers like Finance Minister Tom Marshall have been keen to point out that the system isn’t a done deal here yet. (Given the repeated pitch about the millions of dollars that are just around the corner, you could call it a good bet.)

But the Williams comments are a bit of a curveball. You can honestly argue that there are few in the Williams government — heck, few even in the cabinet — with a big enough reputation to form a Tory government or marshall the required votes in the absence of the big guy.

Now, the big guy says he’s against Internet gambling, and wouldn’t vote to support the plan in cabinet — meaning that, if it goes ahead, either Williams was blowing smoke, or his fellow cabinet ministers decided to out-vote their boss.

In other words, Williams has essentially taken himself out of the play if the lottery corporation’s Internet betting goes ahead — leaving any potential egg for other faces at the cabinet table.

If the Internet wagering does go ahead, Williams has basically said it’s not his fault — it’s the fault of the other cabinet members, who, as a result of rules of cabinet confidentiality and cabinet solidarity, wouldn’t even be able to say what the discussion at the table was, or how they personally voted on the issue.

Once a cabinet decision is made, all cabinet members are supposed to support the decision, despite any personal misgivings. And they have to button their lips to boot. Or is that to butt?

 So does that mean that the proposal is dead, as far as this province is concerned?

Depends.

Depends how much we end up needing the money later on, and how successful other provinces are at their versions of the same scheme. It’s remarkable how often a gap of a couple of years takes the curse off the sins of others.

But in a world where Premier Williams really was just one more voice at the cabinet table, he’s done a remarkable job of completely undercutting anyone else’s position.

Russell Wangersky is The Telegram’s

editorial page editor. He can be contacted at rwanger@thetelegram.com.

Comments

  • Username
    Charles Kennedy
    - August 25th, 2010 at 13:01:05

    If a=b and a=c then a=c . william's opinion =against gambling kennedy's opinion=against gambling Therefore williams opinion =kennedy's opinion marshall's opinion =for gambling Therefore william's opinion marshall's opinion If more opinions =williams opinion -> no gambling otherwise gambling THAT IS THE GIST OF THE ARGUMENT !!!!! Prof K

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Robin Brentnall
    - August 25th, 2010 at 11:19:57

    Just another statement to make this Lawyer look like he had nothing to do with the decision, just like sending Kennedy to the Premiers Conference to kill healthcare. Teflon Dan is never going to do anything to put himself in danger, always dodging responsibility, and never being held accountable except when it's foolproof. Not much of what a leader is all about, sounds more like a Canadian General.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jon Murphy
    - August 24th, 2010 at 10:56:57

    Sorry to upset the members of the disgrunted Liberals club here on the telegram forums. All I see here is a bit too much of reading into a comment by the Premier (that Mr Wangerskey has admitted to not even hearing because he was on vacation) riddled with pessimism and cynicism. All I recall hearing is Mr. Williams giving his opinion on the issue, which just like me and you, he is entitled to. I don't recall him making a firm decision that there will not be online gambling promoted in the province. Maybe Mr. Wangersky could have taken some initiative and approached some members of cabinet to actually ask their opinion on the matter. But no, just like a disgruntled liberal, would rather just be cynical to Mr. Williams and assume the worst.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Eugene from Town
    - August 24th, 2010 at 10:53:25

    Perhaps the other members of cabinet might come out with their 'personal opinions' about government getting in on internet gaming. Then when (if) cabinet approves government's participation the honourable members can point out that their personal opinions don't inform their cabinet decisions. Methinks this might be complimentary to Williams' 'I'm only one voice' claim.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Geoff Meeker
    - August 24th, 2010 at 09:52:08

    Me thinks Russell makes total sense. Rather than address the gist of Russell's arguments, Gutless Jon attacks Russell's motives, a typical Williams Government tactic. Is Gutless Jon one of his minions? (I say gutless because he is afraid to sign his name.)

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jon
    - August 24th, 2010 at 08:01:44

    Me thinks someone got a bit of a beef with the Premier...

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Telegram is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising