Mum's the word

Pam Frampton
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

“Let your government be accountable, this is a democracy after all.”

— A comment posted on

Premier Kathy Dunderdale’s Facebook page


By the time this column is printed, I hope Jason Daniel Earle has been found.

As of this writing, he was still at large after having eluded his escorts last Saturday during a prisoner transfer in St. John’s.

Eighteen years old, he has mental health problems and, according to his father, has not been taking his medication.

Jason’s father is not the only one concerned about how his son escaped and what is being done to find him and get him the medical attention he needs.

The media and members of the public have questions, too.

So far, few have been answered.

The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has referred inquiries about the escape to the Department of Justice, since Earle had been in the custody of that department’s staff.

It’s too bad he wasn’t in RNC custody, because if he had gotten away on their watch, they would have provided the public with an explanation of how it had happened by now.

The Justice Department said, in response to queries Wednesday, that it has completed a review of the escape and that “all protocols and policies were practised appropriately. These protocols are based on best practices from across the country.”

It also said sheriff’s officers and both adult and youth corrections officers receive regular training in the use of force and restraints.

Let’s face it, mistakes happen. To err is human.

But what are the protocols? Why did they fail?

We deserve answers. Jason Earle’s family deserves answers. They have every right to expect his safety would be assured when he was in the care of the Department of Justice, and members of the public have every right to expect their safety is assured.

Instead, an ill person is at large and in need of medical intervention, and members of the public have been told to exercise caution if they spot him.


Not much to say

As a cabinet minister, Felix Collins seems to prefer crafted, non-attributed emailed statements over direct answers. Sure, he’ll get on the phone with a reporter and muse about why Newfoundland and Labrador deserves representation in the Supreme Court of Canada, but ask him when the court system will get its long-promised beefed-up security measures and he’s less expansive.

“I’ll be honest with you, I thought we’d have this up and running long before this,” he told The Telegram last month, adding, “I can’t prejudge when cabinet meets or when they’ll decide on it.”

As justice minister — the person ultimately responsible for security in the courts — perhaps he should try to exert some influence.

With all those members of the public, prisoners, lawyers, court staff and journalists down there, mingling freely in a cauldron of ramped-up emotion and roiling anger, it’s only a matter of time before someone gets hurt.

Surely this should be a priority.

In June, Collins spoke at a conference on law enforcement occupational health and safety and talked about the importance of keeping employees safe.

“Your jobs are inherently dangerous because you’re frontline responders who sometimes get involved in highly volatile situations,” he said to the delegates. “When someone else is trying to get away from the situation, you’re trying to get into it to help resolve it.”

Well, the same goes for people working in the justice system, whether it’s a sheriff’s officer serving a summons for someone to appear in court or a legal aid lawyer having to counsel someone with a violent criminal history.

And speaking of criminals, what’s the status of the peer review of the work of the psychiatrist down at Her Majesty’s Penitentiary? We haven’t heard much on that lately. Then again, Collins said when he ordered the peer review last spring that he wouldn’t even tell the public what the outcome was once the review was done.

When it’s done. If it’s done.

One thing’s for sure, that psychiatrist will soon have more patients on his hands as Prime Minister Stephen Harper implements his “tough on crime” legislation.

That legislation, as Correctional Service of Canada commissioner Don Head has noted, will mean thousands more prisoners added to prisons in this country that will then require thousands more staff and expensive additions and renovations.

Last year, Collins wasn’t balking at the legislation, which the feds said the provinces had asked for.

“It’s sort of a double whammy,” he said in October 2010. “We all knew there would be a price tag.”

Now he’s calling the new laws costly and overly punitive.

But even before all those fresh prisoners begin their lengthier periods of incarceration, there are problems to contend with at Her Majesty’s Penitentiary.

Just last month there was a mysterious five-day lockdown that the Justice Department was unwilling to discuss, calling it “an internal security matter.”

So, let’s get this straight — more prisoners, cramped quarters, insufficient facilities, overburdened courts, prisoner transfer protocols that obviously aren’t foolproof and security measures that have not been implemented.

Where’s the justice and accountability in that?

We need less politician-speak and more straight-up answers. There’s a difference between issuing departmental statements and actually saying something.

Someone needs to tell the minister that our open justice system needs to be open from the top down.


Pam Frampton is The Telegram’s story

editor. She can be reached by email at

Twitter: pam_frampton.

Organizations: Department of Justice, The Telegram, Supreme Court of Canada Correctional Service of Canada

Geographic location: Newfoundland and Labrador

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Bimbo
    November 05, 2011 - 19:25

    "Less political speak" sums it all up. The Yanks can be obnoxious in their questioning of authorities but by god they get the answers. We need more of that here. None of this "we're not saying anything more at this time". Does anybody notice how many times government's response to a question is along the lines of "we're studying it", or "we're looking at that", when in fact they've been caught again with their pants down again? Reporters should jump on that "political speak".

  • William Daniels
    November 05, 2011 - 12:59

    Out of the darkness into the light my a@#. Collins has shown nothing but the hieghts of buffoonery since taking this post. Let us not forget the kiss of death for any department, Jerome Kennedy.

  • Cyril Rogers
    November 05, 2011 - 10:20

    Ms Frampton, you and the rest of the media have given this administration and the prior PC administration a free ride for so long that they think they can rule with impunity. They are answerable to nobody and you folks tend to spend more time criticizing the opposition than you do the dictatorial attitude of this and previous PC administrations. How about we start with a House of Assembly that is actually open long enough for the Opposition to ask the government some of the messy questions they don't want to answer? Why is the media not focused on that issue---one that strikes at the heart of the basic problem we have here. They hide behind closed doors and like to make all of their decisions that way, with no accountability to anyone. So far, you folks in the media have been giving them an easy ride!

    • U Blind hypocrite
      November 06, 2011 - 15:36

      Spend more time reading and less time posting comments and you might actually learn something.