House of babble

Russell Wangersky
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

All right: I’ll admit it. I’m boring.  I actually read Hansard, the written record of this province’s House of Assembly. Not just question period, either. I read the whole darned thing, from members’ statements to the debates themselves.

I watch the House on its online webcast, too — at least, I watch for as long as I can, because this particular House of Assembly is beyond cringe-worthy. 

It’s pathetic.

And believe me, I’ve got the experience to know that. I’ve covered this province’s legislature in one form or another since 1986, watching the House under the administrations of Brian Peckford, Tom Rideout, Clyde Wells, Brian Tobin, Beaton Tulk, Roger Grimes, Danny Williams and now Kathy Dunderdale. That’s going on 26 years of House-watching.

This has always been an underperforming legislature, perhaps because it is always a majority government.

Government politicians don’t co-operate or reach consensus, they just speak from on high, belittling and bullying the opposition members on the other side of the House.

But that doesn’t mean the opposition always performs in stellar fashion either, and that’s certainly the case right now: questions are opened-ended and slack, and usually look for all the world like last-minute efforts dredged up from whatever the morning’s media headlines have brought.

Truly effective oppositions not only know the questions they’re asking, but they often have some knowledge of the answers, too.

Then, when governments prevaricate or trot out a handful of off-point bluster, the opposition members go outside the House and give the media the answers the government has been avoiding.

Right now, the opposition asks a question, the government answers with some stagey bluster that really only the government members seem to enjoy, and everything stops.

But if you really want to see where this particular House is falling down, you have to look at the debates on legislation.

Because, with few exceptions (Finance Minister Tom Marshall and Liberal Andrew Parsons), there are no real debates on legislation. With the exception of that pair, there’s little in the way of careful examination of the bills that become law.

Somewhere along the line, MHAs’ efforts on debate have been replaced with lengthy travelogue paeons to the wonders of their own districts.

If there’s a motion on small business tax rates, a government member will start listing every program that has ever been brought in and applied to small business, with a healthy listing of small businesses in their districts.

An opposition member will follow with an equally fawning description of how much they love small business in their district.

How about discussing the merits of proposed legislation? “Nah, that’s too boring, all that reading and considering, Mr. Speaker, because in my district …”

Instead of examining the legislation, the member spends time outlining the past record of their own administration: “In the last minute that I have, I will reiterate some of the investments that this government has made in Corner Brook and region, including the Bay of Islands, in the last number of years. The courthouse in Corner Brook, again, millions of dollars; the long-term care unit which we were talking about today, millions of dollars; dementia units, millions of dollars; Corner Brook Regional High, the school which I was the principal of, again, millions of dollars; planning for the former Regina school, on the way and future development; Bartlett’s Point, hundreds of thousands of dollars; the revitalization of Margaret Bowater Park; road paving and infrastructure work on both sides of the Bay of Islands; cost-shared of the Trans-Canada Highway from Massey Drive west; moneys for the new fire pumper truck in Corner Brook, and in Meadows, in the Bay of Islands; moneys to straighten the road at Gallants; the new Dunfield Park Community Centre; support for Summit Place in Corner Brook; the new residence at Grenfell Campus, and a new administrative building at Grenfell Campus, Memorial University.”

Keep in mind that it doesn’t really matter who the MHA was. The party doesn’t matter either.

Politics in this province used to be mixed with legislation.

Now, it’s theatre instead of substance.

And I think, by saying that, I just insulted theatre.

Russell Wangersky is The Telegram’s editorial page editor. He can be reached by email at


This article has been changed to fix a typographical error.

Organizations: Regina school, Trans-Canada Highway, Dunfield Park Community Centre

Geographic location: Corner Brook, Bay of Islands, Margaret Bowater Park Meadows

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • William Daniels
    March 27, 2012 - 18:41

    It's okay Russell. I sometimes read it to. It is quite cringeworthy. I thought it all started going downhill when Danny got in.

  • Unfortunate Son
    March 27, 2012 - 16:10

    What was the big deal in keeping it closed? At least the light bill would be less.

  • Premier Dunderdale please take a breath of air and assess what you are doing to yourself and your eectorate
    March 27, 2012 - 09:30

    Premier Dunderdale and her fellow MHAs had better start listening to what the Opposition is saying because what they are saying is what her electorate's wishes are. Every day by her ignoring and opposing what is being said by the Opposition she is digging a deeper grave for herself. I have yet to hear anyone yet that I have come in contact with say they approve of what she is doing. It is all negative. With 3 years left in her tenure I think she can turn matters around if she adheres to the wishes of the electorate. What her electorate wants is what Ms. Dunderdale wanted when she was in Opposition. We all want our natural and human resources working for our province in a way that they create the primary economy for our province instead of for others, as what happened in the past. We don't want to be giving away our resources forever wthout just rewards. All is not lost for you Premier just change your course and you will do just fine over the next three years.

  • Herb Morrison
    March 27, 2012 - 07:04

    Well said, Mr. Wangersky.