- September 22, 2012 - 14:56
Enbridge has a horrible track record of oil spills! Just read the report of the US ministry of transportation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live in Terrace!!!! And these mountains are so remote and far away that when we have a spill it takes days even weeks to get there and clean it up. The damage has been done! Do we need a other deep horizon!!! People should learn from there mistakes! Not keep making the same mistakes. So there are people that claim that if you are agains a pipe line you are stupid. I think you have to be stupid to run a pipeline in the worlds most precious nature we have and diverse eco system!!!! I know for most of you, it as a far from your bed show. Maybe you should talk different if they run the pipeline in your home town! I bet you would be against it to! Just that we live up north in the most beautiful part of Canada doesn't mean you can destroy it because most people don't care what happens here. Citizen of Terrace BC!
- September 21, 2012 - 22:31
It's probably easier to ship to the west coast by rail. The immediate cost is saved in construction, no need to hire workers to put it in. It's not as efficient over long term and, well there is still the risk of spill, statistically much more (by volume moved versus volume spilled). Enbridge loses the business and CN/CP gain. Faster rail to sea transfer is engineered and no one complains. It's not going to move as fast and this will dull the growth of developing nations who's thirst for petroleum wont skyrocket like it has in the US.
- September 16, 2012 - 14:21
First off, check your pipeline routing for N Gate. Does not cross the Skeena. Pipelines are the safest mode to transport anything. 99.994 % gets to where it's supposed to go without incident. Tankers are pretty darn safe too, especially when the cargo is inside rather than strapped on deck. Never mid bitumen is way more solid (or heavy) than the Bunker C grade oil involved in Valdez. Given BC is pondering 4 LNG plants in Kitimat, how do you think the BC government is going to get nat gas from Montney to the coast?
- Paul Smith
- September 18, 2012 - 08:48
It was stated in a comment that the Pipeline does not cross the Skeena. It crosses the Skeena Watershed which means it crosses the tributaries flowing into the Skeena. It crosses the Frazer watershed as well.
- Rex Randall Shoop
- September 16, 2012 - 13:18
Harper says that the, Northern Gateway Pipeline, will be based on science and not political views when it comes to whether it gets approved or not. Harper defended Asbestos with every ounce of his being when all the science and every rational thinking person was against it, he has now switched sides because of political pressure. Can Harper be believed when he makes pronouncements about the pipeline, at this time my answer is, no.
- C. Brown
- September 15, 2012 - 21:32
"Paranoia is one of the most unpleasant “side effects” of marijuana. It’s also a key experience shared by marijuana smokers and people with schizophrenia. But exactly how does smoking a joint cause the feeling that dark forces are conspiring to do you wrong? The findings, published in the Journal of Neuroscience, suggest that activity in the basolateral amygdala is involved in marijuana-induced paranoia (the state of becoming afraid of things that wouldn’t normally trigger fear). That means marijuana is actually enhancing a type of learning about fear, leading the brain to jump to conclusions about mild experiences involving particular places or things, and to perceive them as scarier and more strongly connected than they are. This increased fear-based learning helps explain why stoners tend to see patterns in events that aren’t real, such as conspiracies. "
- September 15, 2012 - 18:19
Pipelines arw the best, cheapest, and st way to transport oil. Not liking oil is one thing....as ridiculously unrealistic and completely hypocritical on everybody's part as that postion is ......but being "against pipelines" is an intellectually incompetent level of stupid.
- September 15, 2012 - 17:37
If you guys are not going to post my comments i will cancel my subscription.
- Andrew Allan
- September 15, 2012 - 16:17
I wish more people from other regions of Canada could visit British Columbia's extremely rugged North Coast so they could understand exactly what kind of global treasure is being put at stake by this Northern Gateway proposal. Super tanker navigating the worlds fourth most dangerous coastline and this continents most pristine marine and terrestrial ecosystem. The tanker ban that was recently lifted on the BC North Coast has for the first time is a looming disaster for the whales both from ship strike and underwater noise, not including what will happen when the first big spill occurs. We don't need this pipeline to Asia, especially not one that will destroy the worlds last largest wild salmon spawning habit. None credibly believe that Stephen Harper cares one iota for the environment or science, so this has to be where the line is drawn to say that at least SOME terrestrial and marine ecosystems are too important to play Russian roulette with.
- David G McRae
- September 15, 2012 - 14:30
Thank you for opposing the northern gateway proposal Paul. This twin pipeline is frat with far too many down sides and very little upside. The narrow views of the Oil Patch seems to hold the lines to federal and provincial governments . It would appear that the more subsidies Alberta and the feds. give to the oil company's, the more desperate they become to thrust this unsound Enbridge proposal on us. They have all put the cart before the TEAM!! We on the west coast of Canada WILL stand and protect our waters, seeing as how the governments wont!!
- C. Brown
- September 15, 2012 - 12:11
"BC should regulate, produce and distribute marijuana to gain tax revenues" - Green Party of BC urges other political parties to legalize mYarijuana. With legalization politicians will increase lung cancer, and psychotic paranoia amongst citizens while collecting cash as a dope dealer. Why is it that the province with the highest number of marijuana users also has the highest number of people living in a psychotic state of fear about naturally occurring hydrocarbons existing on Earth since the beginning of time, and will continue to exist until the end of time? If the pipelines were full of a different THC than what is transported now would there be stoners trying to shut them down? What has caused pipeline opponents to be paranoid? "Paranoia is one of the most unpleasant “side effects” of marijuana. It’s also a key experience shared by marijuana smokers and people with schizophrenia. But exactly how does smoking a joint cause the feeling that dark forces are conspiring to do you wrong? The findings, published in the Journal of Neuroscience, suggest that activity in the basolateral amygdala is involved in marijuana-induced paranoia (the state of becoming afraid of things that wouldn’t normally trigger fear). That means marijuana is actually enhancing a type of learning about fear, leading the brain to jump to conclusions about mild experiences involving particular places or things, and to perceive them as scarier and more strongly connected than they are. This increased fear-based learning helps explain why stoners tend to see patterns in events that aren’t real, such as conspiracies. " Other examples of drug induced paranoia; Fear of drowning from annual millimeters increases of sea level, or scared to touch gooey organic oil or people would have to work for a living. Over 7 billion humans use organic hydrocarbons in one form or another daily; from babies chewing on soothers to elders wearing a hearing aid. In case BC politicians were busy getting stoned and they missed it, the hydrocarbon industry is making remarkable progress with combustion pollution control systems.
- September 15, 2012 - 09:51
Dear Mr. Harris As a constituent in the St.John's east riding I would like to inform you that I do not support selling petroleum products to Asia and especially do not support the Northern Gateway Pipeline. As I have supported you on your political endeavors, I would appreciate your support on this issue in Parliament. Thank you, Willy