Power of one



Published on July 9, 2011
Published on July 9, 2011
 
Topics :
Public Utilities Board , Nova Scotia Power , Energy Corporation , Muskrat Falls , Nova Scotia

“Ask not what your electricity supplier can do for you — ask what you can do for your electricity supplier.” OK, so that’s not really the way the quote goes. But, almost on the eve of spending $6.2 billion — or more — to build a giant hydroelectric dam at Muskrat Falls and power lines to bring the project’s electricity to island markets, you’d think it would be something the provincial government might be considering. Why? Well, perhaps because one of the other provinces that expects to use Muskrat Falls power is thinking exactly that way.

Nova Scotia’s Public Utilities Board has just set feed-in tariff rates for electricity from small, community-based wind producers. Simply put, the PUB there has outlined what Nova Scotia Power — that province’s electrical utility — will pay for electricity produced by small private and community generators.

The province expects to pay 13.9 cents per kilowatt hour for larger wind power projects. Interestingly, that price is less than the 14.3 cents that power from Muskrat Falls will cost in this province — if the project manages to stay on budget.

Nova Scotia Power and the provincial government are expecting that the feed-in tariffs will bring in wind, biomass, small hydro and tidal projects that can deliver up to 100 megawatts of power per year — the bulk of that from wind farms producing at 13.9 cents per kilowatt hour. What’s interesting in the equation in this province is that, even though the provincial government says it’s concerned that increased demand for power will drive up the cost of running the Holyrood generating station, and therefore prices to consumers, it hasn’t moved to set feed-in tariffs in this province. In Nova Scotia, the tariffs are set for 20 years, allowing potential electricity producers to plan their potential return on investment and costs. Setting tariffs here would bring new generation sources online, potentially forestalling the increases without taking on massive new amounts of provincial debt. The provincial government, in its 2007 energy plan, suggested that alternate power on the island could produce an extra 100 megawatts of power from wind and small hydro power generation — but instead of feed-in tariffs, it’s pretty clear the province prefers controlling any development through its energy corporation, Nalcor.

Small hydro projects are currently on hold under a government moratorium. Here’s what the energy plan says about them: “If the provincial government lifts the moratorium, it will institute a policy that the Energy Corporation will control and co-ordinate the development of small hydro projects that meet economic thresholds and are viable for an isolated island system.”

As for wind projects? “To maximize these benefits, the provincial government believes the Energy Corporation should control the development of all wind projects and determine when to develop alone or with private sector partners. We will enable this by adopting a policy that no new leases for wind development on crown land will be issued except to the Energy Corporation or another company acting in partnership with the Energy Corporation.” It looks a lot like the province would prefer all its eggs in one basket. Or, more to the point, the province not only wants to run an energy warehouse, but actually wants to own it all as well. In its own way, that handcuffs consumers in this province. Because one company will decide the most effective way to produce and supply our power. We’ll just pay for it.

Comments

  • Username
    Cyril Rogers
    - July 12, 2011 at 08:03:16

    Calvin, you are misleading people by your comments. Eastern North America is not crying for hydro power and, in fact, a New England governor recently stated that their power needs are sufficinet at this time. Will that change in the future? Most likely it will but the key will be the cost of various alternatives and projects. I am not against developing the Lower Churchill project but only if it makes economic sense. If I am wrong, and if other critics are wrong, why is the government and Nalcor not disputing the figures being bandied about? We need to approach this project with an open mind and a clear statement of facts but we are getting nothing but rhetoric and spindoctoring. Who is the government going to sell the power from Muskrat Falls to? Emera? That seems to be the assumption but how much will Emera pay? Will we have to subsidize the cost of every Kwh sold to them and by how much? How can we make money if we have to pay someone to take it off our hands? Could someone please explain this to me?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Maurice E. Adams
    - July 10, 2011 at 16:57:00

    What may be good for Nalcor is not necessarily good for Newfoundland rate payers.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Calvin
    - July 10, 2011 at 15:05:34

    Cyril, if we are lucky enough to develop this project without going as much over cost as YOU predict, our descendents will be happy that government ignored alarmists like yourself. Multiple sources have predicted that the worlds fossil fuel resources will be used up between 2040-2050. How do you think transportation is going to evolve in the years to come? Electricity based transportation will become wide spread. How nice would it be (when all of north-eastern North America is crying for a massive renewable electricity source) for Newfoundland to be able to sell off our excess power at premium prices to multiple markets with very few alternative options? I know, all of our pocket books will take a hit when electricity rates go up. The dollar also wont go as far when gas goes up and when the cost of food, housing and transportation increase proportionally. However, your PREDICTION that this project is going to cost our children and grandchildren is misleading and uninformed. Renewable electricity will ba almost as important as fresh water in the future, and we all need to be a little more educated, by government, on the long term benefits of this project and try to ignore the oppositions attempt to belittle the government in trying to win some votes. The opposition recently stated that the current government is trying to win a few votes in the upcoming election by launching some pilot projects to diminish moose-vehicle accidents. The only thing the opposition can seem to do to pander to the masses is slam the current government, and I actually would like to see the Liberals jump back into the seat of power so that we can all start to badmouth them for a change. The PC's have taken enough criticism over being, well, a half decent government over the past 7 or 8 years.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Cyril Rogers
    - July 9, 2011 at 12:11:55

    This kind of monopolistic thinking by government and Nalcor is what got us into the potential financial disaster at Muskrat Falls. It will not come even close to being on budget and I would predict cost overruns will increase the total bill by billions. Every major project we have ever done has inevitably cost more than budgeted so why would this one be any different? Power from the Labrador system will never be developed and sold on a competitive basis by a subsea line to Newfoundland island and then on to Nova Scotia. It is simply an effort to bypass Quebec Hydro --but at what cost? Better to leave it to future development or not at all. The other aspect of this article is that we are being environmentally negligent by not adopting small scale technologies. With continued innovation I am confident these wind and other small-scale hydro projects can be cost competitive. After all, it will cost us, the rate payers of NL, hundreds of millions each year just to service the borrowing costs of Muskrat Falls!!. Our descendents will rue our folly!

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Telegram is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising