• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Food fight

Published on May 18, 2012
Published on May 18, 2012
Topics :
United Nations , Conservatives , UN Security Council , Canada , Nunatak , Northern Alberta

“If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.” That’s a pretty reasonable piece of advice, even if few people actually adhere to it. It is in our nature to protest and criticize and call things as we see them.

But there is a crucial kernel of wisdom inherent in that saying: debate or disagree if you must, but at least try to be polite.

Unfortunately, a bevy of Canada’s senior ministers are not party to that basic tenet of human decency.

Faced with a critical report Wednesday on food security in this country, they lashed out at the messenger with childish insults and threats.

It was an astounding display of rudeness and hostility against a UN diplomat.

First, let’s be clear.

Olivier De Schuster’s findings were certainly debatable. In fact, even his presence in the country raised a few eyebrows.

As UN special rapporteur specializing in food rights, De Schuster usually visits more agriculturally challenged regions of the world. This year, his bosses changed his mandate, asking him to visit a few wealthier nations. The idea, one supposes, is that he may be able to offer some useful ideas. At worst, it would help him keep Third World problems in perspective.

Following his report, however, here’s what some federal ministers had to say.

Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq was the only minister who agreed to even meet with him. She said it was “disappointing,” that the envoy was “ill-informed” and “a bit patronizing,” and that he was just “another academic studying us from afar.”

She mocked him for not having visited her home in Nunatak, even though De Schuster did visit other aboriginal communities in northern Alberta and Manitoba.

And she said he didn’t understand the lifestyle and challenges faced by northern natives (even though his findings reflected the opinions of other aboriginal leaders).

Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird also jumped aboard the slugfest, calling De Schuster’s 11-day visit a complete waste of time.

But the most damning comments came from Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, who called the envoy’s mission “completely ridiculous.”

Kenney even issued what seemed to be veiled threats with respect to Canada’s foreign aid.

“It would be our hope that the contributions we make to the United Nations are used to help starving people in developing countries, not to give lectures to wealthy and developed countries like Canada,” he said.

“And I think this is a discredit to the United Nations.”

No one even thought of adding a token “thanks for the input” or even a halfhearted wish for a safe flight home. It was a schoolyard pile-on, the kind of reaction you’d expect in a bellicose dictatorship, but not a respectable western nation.

It was, in short, another major embarrassment for Canada as a whole. Another notch for the Conservatives in their goal to obliterate this nation’s treasured reputation for civility and diplomacy.

And we wonder why Canada didn’t get a seat on the UN Security Council.

Comments

  • Username
    Mark Wilson
    - May 18, 2012 at 15:55:28

    I think that the report highlighted some serious flaws in our food system as well as the growing differences between the rich and the poor in this country. If the fact that fish plant closures are almost a daily occurrence and that the average age of a farmer in this province is 58 then maybe this message will pass into Mr. Kennedy's oil filled eardrums. I feel that the situation here in NL in terms of food security and the economic relationship to food security is critical. We are losing time to act on this issue. This isn't about haters or our proliferation of oil wars across the globe, or even about our global mining industries that have no environmental conscience. This is about the growing health concerns and our growing inability to provide access to adequate amounts of nutritious, safe, and culturally appropriate foods. Why does it take a UN visit to try to affect the course of our great country? Because provincial and federal governments are working in a direction that will make the problem worse. Forget the WTO and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development when it comes to food. They are counteracting the movement toward food security. Economy and food must be linked more at the regional or local level. Newfoundland's government believes in our ability to create income from oil that leaves the province but can't understand the need to create a local food economy in order to keep this money in the province. Just look up the multiplier effect. Time to change things around folks......

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lane
    - May 18, 2012 at 15:14:55

    I'm sure the author of this editorial did his or her best to find the strongest quotes from Conservative ministers on this issue, and yet having read the quotes I don't think a single one of them is "rude" or "hostile". In fact, I agree 100% with the comments of Ministers Aglukkaq, Kenney and Baird. I find Aglukkaq and Kenney to be consistently extremely polite and well-spoken. Certainly more so than those who write editorials for the Telegram.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Athena
    - May 18, 2012 at 14:12:38

    When it comes to food security, we've been spoiled in this Country. The way things are going, we may not be spoiled for a whole lot longer. Huge swaths of prime agricultural land have been, and continue to be, paved over. Average age of a Canadian farmer is around 60. Climate change will bring more droughts, floods etc. If a young person wants to go into farming, and doesn't happen to inherit a farm, he/she is looking at a layout of about $1,000,000.00 for land, buildings, equipment, livestock and quota. What young person has that kind of money? I expect the politicians are already aware of all this, but they want to pretend there's no problem.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Athena
      - May 18, 2012 at 17:09:43

      PS Do we really want factory farms providing us with food? Ginormous farms where the well being of the animals means nothing and where the animals are pumped full of growth hormones and antibiotics? Do we really want imported food from countries whose food safety standards may well not be on par with our own standards? And lastly, I'd like to quote Henry Kissinger who said, "Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world."

  • Username
    Wild Rose
    - May 18, 2012 at 11:44:16

    It's bad enough that we allow the haters in Canada to attack the democratically elected government. Who are these foreigners and why are they allowed to come here. Why is my tax money going to a bumch of enviromentalists, so called scientits and the CBC and the "poverty" indutry who cant say anytinng posivie about Stephen Harper? Our brave soldiers are dying tring to bring civliization to the rest of the world, They should shut up and take care of thier own problems.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    wow
    - May 18, 2012 at 10:53:36

    Looks like someone's got the hate on for a certain political party. Perhaps it's justified.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Tely Twitter

Advertising