Light reading

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

There will always be strong arguments and weak arguments in any debate, and if you plan to be thorough, perhaps you have to present the whole bunch, regardless of how the weaker ones seem to take away from the case you’re trying to make.

That being said, when it comes to the endless row of reports on Muskrat Falls being brought out almost daily now by the Dunderdale government, the latest three, delivered on Friday (“Upper Churchill: Can we wait until 2041?” “Gull Island: Why not develop Gull Island first?” and “Legal Options: S92A, Good Faith and Regulatory Proceedings in Quebec”) are without a doubt the weakest sets of arguments the province has put forward yet.

All three reports were generated internally by the province’s Department of Natural Resources, and, if nothing else, are valuable because they contain (and sometimes repeat) interesting historical information about this province’s ongoing battles over hydroelectric development.

However, they would be better classed as essays than reports; they mostly stick to one side of an argument and provide little in the way of new information.

Take the conclusion of “Upper Churchill: Can we wait until 2041?” which begins, “The power contract between Newfoundland and Labrador and Hydro-Québec has been the source of great resentment for the people of our province for many decades. This contract has resulted in tremendous profits for Hydro-Québec, while providing minimal profits to Newfoundland and Labrador.”

If you see anything new in that, please let us know.

The end of the conclusion is much more abrupt: “Waiting for available Upper Churchill power in 2041 is not a practical, economical, or sensible alternative to Muskrat Falls.” It’s hard to see fully how that conclusion was reached.

The general format seems to be “here’s what happened in the past, and that’s why we can’t wait until 2041” or “here’s what happened in the past, so we can’t build Gull Island first.”

The essays adequately (and only sometimes pejoratively) lay out much of the groundwork that has happened with things like legal challenges of the Upper Churchill contract, but basically err on the side that there are too many unknowns for the government to be able to depend on any other source of power.

In other words, as always, all roads lead to Muskrat Falls.

This does not mean you should not find and

read the reports on the ever-expanding website Like everything else in the Muskrat Falls debate, more information is infinitely better than less, even if the additional information doesn’t really support the conclusions that anchor the documents.

Just don’t confuse these essays with definitive evidence or the carefully studied arguments you would normally expect from a government-sponsored scholarly report.

It may be that there were no stronger and clearer arguments to make to address the particular questions that these efforts sought to satisfy.

One final thought? Their curious lack of heft is more interesting than their weight — they are, more than anything else, from the shallow end of the proof pool.

Organizations: Hydro-Québec, Legal Options, Department of Natural Resources

Geographic location: Gull Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Cyril Rogers
    November 13, 2012 - 17:01

    These "essays" were another assault on our reason. "Just trust us!"is the message they are telling us, while insulting our intelligence by producing reports based on their own opinions and beliefs. Sad, isn't it! This was supposed to be an intelligent analysis and it has been turned into a circus by the clown who want us to believe their dogma. No real research...just a political interpretation of events. No formal analysis of what actually will happen in 2041. It is our resource and we are the majority shareholder but we are to assume that Quebec will pull the strings. Are we that stupid..... after all these years of being told Danny gave us back our pride? The more "information" they throw at us the more I realize that they actually think we are stupid enough to swallow their garbage. I would hope not!!

  • Maurice E. Adams
    November 13, 2012 - 07:12

    And again, where is the report showing that Hydro Quebec cannot (and will not) enter into a 25 year power purchase agreement (at very competitive rates capable of undercutting Muskrat Falls by BILLIONS of dollars) that can get us to 2041? ---- ABout 5 times cheaper than Muskrat . See