The 1.6 per cent

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Wednesday, as the House of Assembly staggered through a mostly useless debate on a motion

basically affirming the government’s wonderfulness, Finance Minister Jerome Kennedy offered up a little benchmark worth noting.

“We only have, Mr. Speaker, 1.6 per cent of our tax filers are making more than $150,000, or 6,500 people — 1.6 per cent of tax filers make more than $150,000, or 6,500 people.” It is an interesting point because of all the debate about the way things have improved for the top one per cent of income-earners in North America. And because, in Newfoundland, plenty of the slightly larger 1.6 per cent actually work for the rest of us.

It means, of course, that Premier Kathy Dunderdale is one of the 1.6 per cent. All of her cabinet, when you take into account their full salaries and their taxable benefits (like car and gas allowances) are members of the 1.6 per cent club, too. The Speaker of the House is pretty close, if not right in there, as is the Leader of the Opposition.

But with the release of the departmental salary details this week, you can see there are a few more in the mix, like the clerk of the Executive Council ($200,958) and (almost) the deputy-clerk, at $149.296. In total, there are some 70 senior civil servants who find themselves firmly in the 1.6 per cent.

And that’s only in the core civil service: that’s not taking into account the heads of health boards, or the province’s doctors — it’s hard to factor doctors in, because many are paid in their practices and you have to deduct the costs of those practices from any eventual income. But you can point out that a snippet of a recent auditor general’s report showed a total of 80 physicians or physicians’ practices in this province billed more than $600,000 a year, all the way up to a whopping $1.44 million, in 2011.

It also doesn’t consider the money paid out by Crown corporations. Like Nalcor — in 2009 (and salaries have probably not gone down), there were these salaries: president and CEO $390,612.72; vice-president engineering services, Newfoundland Hydro $149,377.58; vice-president, human resources organizational effectiveness $217,606.56; vice-president finance and CFO $251,960.59; vice-president regulated operations, Hydro $243,414.21; vice-president, strategic planning and business development $209,007.74; vice-president, Lower Churchill project $263,527.36; vice-president, oil and gas $221,382.29; vice-president and general manager, Churchill Falls $207,041.84.

Is the message that the people who are paid by government are paid too much? No.

Perhaps it should be that the rest of the province is paid so little that it doesn’t take much to find yourself in 1.6 per cent.

Two other notes from Kennedy’s comments: “four per cent of the tax filers make more than $100,000 — that is 18,000 people — and they pay 30 per cent of the total taxes in the province.” On Ontario’s sunshine list, for example — which reveals all civil servants who make over $100,000 — there are 88,412 people making more than $100,000 a year.

And think about this: while 80 per cent of this province’s taxpayers are paying less than 40 per cent of the province’s income taxes — they don’t make enough money to be paying more — they’re still paying the full shot for everything else, from HST on purchases to liquor levies to government fees.

And that raises an interesting question. We hear a lot about our red-hot, or even white-hot, economy.

Is this really what prosperity looks like?

Organizations: Executive Council

Geographic location: North America, Newfoundland, Ontario

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • EDfromRED
    April 21, 2013 - 17:31

    The Justice & Education Dept. cuts show how little the PC's care about common people! We might as well bring back paupers prisons and workhouses for poor orphans and widows. This government has a steady pattern of taking us backwards as a society...except when it comes to Muskrat Fall's, where they 'bend over backwards' to grant every monetary wish they desire.

  • Wondering
    April 20, 2013 - 15:47

    As one of the 1.6 percent who makes more than 150,000.00 per year, I find it appalling that all those with income way below me will be paying about 50 percent more to heat their homes in the near future, thanks to Kennedy's efforts to sanction Muskrat falls. And most of these low income people have been convinced, by Kennedy that this is necessary, to avoid blackouts. I, like Kennedy, and the other 1.6 percent, can afford higher costs for electricity to heat our houses, but will NOT pay higher costs. We will install the more efficient heating systems to offset this cost. So we will (shamelessly, I suggest) shift this 10 billion Muskrat Falls cost to the poorer people, who can't afford to do this.. But lets make believe that I and the other 1.6 percent will be paying the loins share for this high power source, and will equally pay the power bills. Wake up people. 60 percent still support this project. Lambs to the slaughter! Time for the media to again ask: Do we need that expensive power? Especially given their forecast are again off substancially. Look at their record? Less production and lower oil costs for Holyrood, the very opposite of what they forecast!!!!! This must give Ed Martin nightmares. And shouldn't it? Wishful thinking doesn't change reality.

    • Just Wondering Too
      April 22, 2013 - 12:22

      I'm just wondering too, if it's just a coincidence that we've had major power outages lately without storms, hurricanes, freezing rain, sleet, etc.; or, could it be that someone wants us to think we need another power source, say....Muskrat Falls.

  • Tom Baird
    April 20, 2013 - 12:56

    A broader critique of the Jerome Kennedy and Glen Littlejohn's statements that afternoon can be found through the link. "Provincial Tories talking BS on taxes... again.".

  • Foghorn Leghorn
    April 20, 2013 - 08:48

    I will offer another wrinkle in this calculation, deduct the thousands of people who are working in Alberta and commuting back and forth to NL. Who consider NL home for taxation purposes.

    • Sylvia J.
      April 21, 2013 - 09:24

      GOOD POINT Foghorn!

    • BC
      April 22, 2013 - 09:37

      Nfld doesn't become a preferential place to file taxes in until you're making something in the order of this $150,000. The lower brackets are quite a bit higher than Western Canada.

    • Foghorn Leghorn
      April 25, 2013 - 08:44

      @ BC - I can assure you that any of the tradespeople that are employed in Fort McMurray in particular are making well over $150,000. It would be an interesting statistic to see how many people actually fall into this 1.6 percent category.