Fact or fiction

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Years ago, on the noire television series “Twin Peaks,” there was a recurring statement that, “The owls are not what they seem.” There were plenty of owls cropping up in episodes of the show, often at critical times, and they always looked and sounded like owls. But still, plenty of the show’s characters repeated the warning.

Here’s a different take on that concept, this time on the Internet — the experts are not what they seem.

Tuesday, the New York Times reported on the end of a very long hunt. For three years, investment firm Goldman Sachs has been hunting for a mole.

The mole was the Goldman employee behind the Twitter account @GSElevator, which purported to reveal what Goldman Sachs employees were talking about on the company’s elevators. Some of it was choice: tidbits like, “I never give money to homeless people. I can’t reward failure in good conscience” and “I could watch fat people getting out of cars all day.”

More than 600,000 people followed the Twitter account, a number that certainly helped its creator garner a six-figure book deal based on the tweets.

Turns out, though, that the “overheard comments” weren’t exactly word for word, and they certainly weren’t overheard on Goldman Sachs elevators. Their creator is a 34-year-old former money-market employer named John Lefevre — he hasn’t worked for the company, but he has worked for Citigroup, so presumably, he’d know the ethical turf involved. He doesn’t live in New York — he lives in Texas. And he knows just how to work Twitter’s 140-character genre. You don’t wind up with 600,000 followers by being unconvincing.

The whole episode, however, reinforces a valuable lesson about the Internet, and one that people often seem willing to ignore: the quality of the vast acreage of information it supplies is directly related to the quality, skill and knowledge of the people who post it. You will occasionally see postings, for example, that the Holyrood generating station is something like the eighth largest polluter in the world. Now, Holyrood does pollute, but the numbers are patently, obviously false. The Holyrood generating station, in a 2010 Environment Canada pollution rating, was 82nd in Canada — with some sites in Alberta clocking in at over 20 times Holyrood’s emissions. And that’s just Canada — add just China into the mix, and Holyrood isn’t even a blip on the pollution map. Heck, Holyrood isn’t even the eighth-largest polluter in the Atlantic provinces; it’s 13th.

And that’s just one kind of questionable data. Newfoundland Power has been trying to deal with a handwritten, photographed note that suggests that, during the blackout, it lowered the amperage of power being delivered and basically defrauded homeowners: the utility has flatly denied the problem, but the endless sharing of that most trustworthy unsigned handwritten note goes on.

People can set up shop as their own sort of judge, jury and execution, decrying the political leanings of public figures and media pundits, all from that most-trustworthy of stages, the anonymous handle.

All of this is a roundabout way of pointing out — again — that, often, the owls are not what they seem. And that when you’re collecting facts, the sources matter, too.

Organizations: Goldman Sachs, New York Times, Citigroup Environment Canada Newfoundland Power

Geographic location: Holyrood, Canada, New York Texas Alberta China

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Belching pollutants from smoke stacks is a crime against humanity and the environment, when other methods are available to capture and store carbon.
    February 28, 2014 - 04:52

    The Captains of Industry who allow carbon to be belched into the atmosphere should be brought to justice for their crimes. As far as I am concerned this is a crime against humanity and every other living thing when one takes into consideration the damages done to ones health and the early deaths that occur because of the pollution that is allowed by governments and the corporations. They both are so greedy they need 90 cents on every dollar made of the people's natural resources. Corporations have to be satisfied with less of the pie so that the people's health and the environment are less affected by the poisonous pollutants. It is nothing short of Corruption when governments and Corporations allow damages to occur from industry when there are methods available to ameliorate the damages .

  • JD
    February 27, 2014 - 15:29

    It will be interesting to see how the Public Utilities Board Review of DarkNL will address these issues and I hope it will be televised.

  • Pollution is not good for our health!
    February 27, 2014 - 13:47

    I have been all over Canada and I have witnessed hundreds of smoke stacks spewing out pollution at a much greater degree than Holyrood. If I were to rate the pollution from the Hollyrood stack, I would say it would be the least polluting stack in Canada. After saying that I know it is not good for those living near any stack belching pollutants and I think pollutants should be looked after with a different method. No doubt it would be more costly than the present way of carrying away the pollution, but what is any more costly than providing medicare for those who become sick from the pollutants we have to breathe in each and every day?

  • Observer
    February 27, 2014 - 12:04

    Yeah, right.....tell that to the people who have lived in Seal Cove and Holyrood or downwind of there for the last forty or fifty years.

  • Joe
    February 27, 2014 - 07:27

    Are you implying that all people who criticize are wrong? Based on the cases you have quoted. CNBC switches between PRO and EXPERT for its guests and neither are correct as they are all salesmen selling a financial product.

  • Maurice E. Adams
    February 27, 2014 - 06:22

    And in a NL context ---- Holyrood has no impact on 92% of the province's greenhouse gas emissions (Source? --- the province's own Climate Change Plan).