Duped by tweeps

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave — especially when it’s the World Wide Web that’s doing the weaving.

By now, it’s more than obvious that things found on the Internet are often not what they seem to be.

Criminal charges are regularly laid against men who mask their real identities to lure teenaged girls into Internet communications and more, and the day is not complete without an email or two from a deposed prince in Nigeria who needs your help laundering millions in illegally obtained American money.

You know, the ones that read like this: “Do you have financial problem? If yes, your problem has ended. Are you interested in being a member of a fraternity that offers you MONEY POWER RESPECT and FAME and more… Do you want to be a member of the Illuminati? We can change your life forever, give you connection all over the world. We stand as a symbol of authority we are promoting the bond of brother hood.” (The Illuminati? Why, that’s some kind of secret religious group — so it’s got to be true.)

But if it’s hard enough separating the wheat from the chaff in your email (discovering who is really planning to hand you a few million dollars for no particular reason), it turns out that email is only the beginning.

Sure, there are fake sites on the Internet that shouldn’t be believed, but researchers are now showing that millions upon millions of tweets sent out through Twitter aren’t real either.

At Indiana University, researchers sampled millions of tweets to set up an algorithm to trap something known as a social bot — social bots are fake or captured Twitter addresses that masquerade as real Twitter users and swamp the Twittersphere with spam tweets.

One of the results of the work was something called “Bot or Not?” — a web engine that can take a Twitter handle and run through all of its tweets and retweets to decide whether or not that account is showing the attributes of social bot behaviour.

(Isn’t science wonderful? We tested some Telegram reporters’ Twitter handles in Bot or Not?, but the results were inconclusive. The

system crashed instead of giving us a clear answer.)

Bot or Not? joins a bunch of other technology designed to see if the best of our technology is lying to us.

There’s now technology available to see if old pictures have been harvested, recaptioned and reused to support particular political concerns, along with others that will tell you whether or not images have been processed through modifying programs like Photoshop.

Seeing, unfortunately, is not believing.

There may be something new on the web just about every day.

Lying, in one form or another, seems to have been around forever.

Organizations: Indiana University

Geographic location: Nigeria

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Moderator
    July 30, 2014 - 15:20

    Please note: this editorial was written by Russell Wangersky, but represents the voice of The Telegram's senior management and publisher, and is usually vetted as such. It is not signed in accordance with the long and well-honoured tradition of presenting the newspaper's point of view as a single voice.

    • Hiding behind the masthead or valid traditional presentation?
      July 30, 2014 - 16:50

      A troll by any other name smells as pathological. Time honored tradition has been honored well enough. If journalists are to continue to dedicate so much energy to troll-bashing, and anonymous shaming then people will pushback against unsigned unclaimed work so why not take the next step and be the change. The people who read the people's paper are not wrong in giving this the people's eyebrow. The illuminati is not a religion, it is a secret (stupid people needing to feel smart, sound familiar, by exploiting tradition) society (a funnier joke than craft masonry "sewing circles") like the editorial circle of Newfie Johns-people paper-weights! Vetted as such...Who cares! Put a name on it. Put Patrick Butlers name on it, haha, analogous to propping up a drunk rookie behind the wheel of the bus after getting pulled over! Tradition doesn't make it acceptable. See Israel vs Gaza. Status and identity. Put a name on it Tely Staff. Why hide behind tradition? Just sign it as the collective, so that those with no media savvy to comprehend Pulitzer and Hearst tradition don't get so mad and confused.

  • Tina
    July 30, 2014 - 14:24

    Yeah why is the Telegram posting articles lately with no author?

  • Jim Bobs
    July 30, 2014 - 12:39

    Laughable you post an article about the darkness, smoke and mirrors that is the current internet and has no name attached to it. Feeling duped.