Thanks for the memories, Ray

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Before Ray David George Guy (1939-2013) — celebrated social and political commentator, author and playwright — left his childhood home in Arnold’s Cove (eight kilometres from his birthplace, Come By Chance), he chose writing as his adulthood vocation.

He was largely influenced in his career decision by Joseph R. Smallwood Liberals’ resettlement program (which, from 1954 to 1975, relocated almost 30,000 people from some 300 villages). He was, he said, deeply troubled by grief the program caused his fellow rural Newfoundlanders. He employed humour as a weapon to express his dissent from the provincial government’s decisions to create and implement the program.

In particular, he ridiculed its architect, Premier Smallwood, for that program — and much else the premier advocated. His principal vehicle for heaping scorn on the premier was a daily (weekday) column in The Telegram (then The Evening Telegram) from about 1963 to 1974.

 

Only opposition

During part of this period (about 1963 to 1972), his writing served as opposition — sometimes the only substantial challenge — to Smallwood’s provincial government administrations. And, for the remainder of this period (1972 to 1974), he wrote irreverently about Smallwood’s successor, Premier Frank D. Moores (whose electoral success was, in no small part, a product of Guy’s columns).

Motivated, significantly, by the domestic resettlement program to become a journalist, Guy’s acerbic writer’s art was materially impacted by the American humourist, S.J. Perelman. Like Perelman, he was adept at piercing “through to the heart of pretense and conceit.” Years later, Guy yearned for a particular Perelman anthology (his contributions to The New Yorker magazine) which I found in Foyle’s Bookshop, London, and sent to him.

Guy occupied a desk at the back of The Telegram’s newsroom, when located in the Parland Building, 271-275 Duckworth St. Typically, he commenced each matchless weekday column about 1:30 p.m. Using an Underwood, later a Remington, manual typewriter, he would continue to be engrossed in crafting a column at 6 p.m. — often, until much later.

He brooded and troubled over each word, each sentence. His painstaking choice of language was as precise as the wielding by a surgeon of a scalpel in an operating theatre. He teased each paragraph, slowly and cleverly, from his droll mental hard drive.

 Often, he consulted on this or that turn of phrase with newsroom colleagues: Mary Deanne Shears, the women’s editor (later, managing editor of The Toronto Star), and Mary Deanne’s understudy, Jane Williams; news reporters Don Morris, Ron Crocker (later, a CBC producer), Gary Callahan, George Barrett and Frank Holden (now a playwright); sports department writers Bob Badcock, Pee Wee Crane and Ron Rossiter; editing desk staff Bob Ennis (later, of The Montreal Gazette), Maurice Finn and Tommy Power, and Canadian Press correspondent David Butler.

 

Testing editors

Because he regarded Premier Smallwood as fancying himself a messiah, Guy seized on every opportunity to capitalize pronouns, within sentences, referring to the premier. Invariably, the editing desk detected and lower-cased them.

Torpid summer afternoons in The Telegram newsroom were memorable for Guy’s arrival, barefoot, ferrying 10 pound watermelons, which he distributed to colleagues, employing a lobster knife secreted in his desk.

Assigned, one summer morning, to report on Carolyn Hayward, a bullfighter in Spain — who was rumoured to be disembarking a vessel in St. John’s harbour for a visit to her native St. John’s — I approached Guy, seeking advice on interviewing her. He offered to accompany me. Together, we walked both sides of the waterfront and boarded each moored vessel in search of our quarry. Hours later, we identified a woman leaving a ship.

We hailed her and learned her given name was “Carolyn.” Our 4.25 by 5.5 inch newsprint pads in hand, we commenced questioning. Clear from her responses, the woman was not a bullfighter. Rather, she gained her wages from retailing physical intimacy. We made the recounting of her harsh life the subject of a feature story we left on the editing desk about 2:30 a.m. Later that morning, we were escorted one floor up to The Telegram’s executive offices to be chastised by then-management.

Within a month, we were back in the executive suite — to explain why we had devoted a full night to drafting an unassigned story entitled, “St. John’s after dark.”

 

Copies exist

My personal papers include drafts of this imaginative, occasionally fanciful, account of nocturnal St. John’s. Guy was proud of the lead sentence (here published — at long last — for the first time): “Twinkling lights, in a variety of hues, festoon the slate grey shores of the ancient, sheltered harbour at St. John’s, like a necklace of precious and semi-precious trinkets. Beneath them, the city throbs, pulsates, bustles, and — in some precincts — moans.”

Assigned to report an event in Bishop’s Falls, Guy and I missed the late afternoon train from St. John’s. At alarming speeds, he tooled his green coupe to Holyrood station. At first, a police stallion, then a police cycle and eventually a police car pursued him. Guy eluded all comers. On arrival in Holyrood, he concealed his vehicle in a copse of poplars on private property and we caught the train as it chugged from the station.

We suited up in blue turtleneck sweaters and berets, and accessoried ourselves with pince-nez spectacles, on arrival in St-Pierre for another assignment — to report on a rumoured insurrection. Although, as Guy cautioned, we made our inquiries discreetly, we attracted the attention of gendarmes. They briefly detained us and relieved us of our notepads.

 

Breaking news

In 1965, the province received a gift from the Portuguese fisheries organization: a statue of navigator Gaspar Corte-Real. Premier Smallwood proclaimed that an elaborate unveiling was in store.

Guy discovered the gift, crated and wrapped in tarpaulins, lying beside Confederation Parkway. “The unveiling,” Guy announced, “will be sooner, not later.”

He and a junior reporter (who will remain nameless) made a late night visit to the parkway, unpackaged Gaspar — with aid of tire iron and grapnel — and took a “snap” which appeared next afternoon in The Telegram.

Guy was not a fervent adherent of organized religion, but his conversation was often punctuated with brief liturgies from the Church of England’s Book of Common Prayer.

And, during summer lunch hours, at least twice monthly, he and I accompanied reporter John Fraser (later, Master of Massey College, Toronto) to the Anglican Cathedral in St. John’s.

There, we were Fraser’s only audience as he performed hymns, movements and dirges on the cathedral’s Robert Hope-Jones/Casavant organ.

Although impish and ever receptive to join in capers, Ray Guy, by nature, was shy, private and understated. When I paid him a visit in 1975, he was preoccupied, typing and re-typing a short letter on newsprint copy paper. The letter consisted of a single sentence. He planned to deliver the letter to the workplace of Kathie Housser, recently arrived from British Columbia to serve as a CBC producer in St. John’s. Whether he delivered the proposal, I am not aware. Within six months, however, Ray and Kathie were married.

Guy quoted, with ease, passages written by his “mentor,” S.J. Perelman. More than once, he reminded me of Perelman’s sentence that “love is not the dying moan of a distant violin — it is the triumphant twang of a bed spring.” When we reminisced about chasing the “Bullet” to Holyrood, he recounted Perelman’s narrative, “The whistle shrilled, and in a moment, I was chugging out of (New York) Grand Central (Station). … I had chugged only a few feet when I realized that I had left without the train, so I had to run back and wait for it to start.”

 

Lived life to the fullest

Asked by a CBC Radio interviewer, in 2008, whether he had any regrets, he replied “none.”

While Guy was a reporter and columnist at The Telegram, he lived faithful to the creed: life is not a dress rehearsal. In fact, some of his columns were written in the format of theatrical scripts.

Ray Guy’s enduring legacy is a cold type footprint of priceless, published commentary, authored by a rare wordsmith genius, serving to entreat, exasperate, educate, enrich and entertain.

Thanks, Ray — for the memories. Thanks for the indelibly joyful Telegram memories.

 

David C. Day, a Telegram reporter from 1963 to 1967, writes from St. John’s.            

 

 

Organizations: Massey College, The Evening Telegram, CBC Radio New Yorker magazine The Toronto Star Montreal Gazette Canadian Press Church of England Anglican Cathedral

Geographic location: Arnold, Foyle, London Holyrood Spain Confederation Parkway Toronto British Columbia New York Grand Central

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Wondering
    June 13, 2013 - 09:39

    Of all the tributes to Ray Guy, I find the one by Ed Hollett on his site Sir Robert Bond Papers the best, titled "Inquiring Minds? You don't want to know". And it is critical of the local media, saying there is a lack of minds with inquisitiveness. Ray Guy was an exception, but Ed notes that of all the praise for Guy, there is a "dissonance that make you shiver" as Guy finished his career where people would start, in the smaller venues. Ed describes the relentless coverage of Guy as what you would expect for the bastard celebrity love child of Princess Di and Danny Williams. As to inquisitive, doubting , and literate minds, Ed says you'd expect to find newsrooms full of those types, and then quotes Guy from 1974 "the newsrooms of the city are as divorced from reality as the earth is distant from the sun". Then Ed doesn't blame it all on the media. Inquiring minds? he asks." We don't want to know" I guess this says a lot about Nflders as a people. Ray Guy had an inquiring mind, no doubt. Perhaps the best e word to describe him is that he strived to "expose" all that is wrong in our province.

  • Wondering
    June 06, 2013 - 21:52

    Is this the David Day, the lawyer, who was involved in the Mount Cashel investigation? Hard to picture him as a reporter. Did Guy ever aim his pen at Day? And whatever happened to that David Day report? Still a secret document?

    • Eli
      June 07, 2013 - 11:32

      Mean spirited remarks and definitely a Sunday-punch below the belt. I don't know Mr. Day but if in fact he is the same lawyer "involved" in the Mt. Cashel affair, then my hat's off to him all over again.

    • Wondering
      June 07, 2013 - 12:53

      Eli, your hat's off again: for how much he uncovered? For how much he made.. more than half a million dollars? Although that figure is fussy in my mind as it is so long ago, perhaps it is wrong and someone could correct it. For how much was NOT disclosed, and therefore a continuity of coverup? Again, what happened to the David day report? If this is a different Mr. Day , then I have made a mistake, an error say. Mr Day says he was a reporter and don't identify himself as a lawyer. So I wonder. Questions on what was contained in the David Day report was a hot topic, on VOCM talk shows, for perhaps a year in the 1990s , but was never released as far I recall and interest died. Should the media asks such questions? Mean spirited? Not against GUY. A hero of mine. And Day's piece adds to our knowledge of Guy. As a writer, Day does manage to get a string of five consecutive words all beginning with the letter e...."entreat,exasperate, educate. enrich, entertain" to show why Guy's legacy will be enduring ( another e word). I agree with all these except "exasperate". Many would consider "entertain" an the most important, for me it was "educate". Guy could also embellish, a skill that added to the humor. And "emulate" is perhaps appropriate, and energise, engage, enliven, enrapture, enthral, enthrone, entice, enthuse, entrance, entrap, entwine. But Guy's legacy cannot be restricted by just e words. Day's piece suggest he was a reporter, I guess, with some writing skills. But writing may not be his legacy, unless it is the David Day report. And who can say since no one can see it.

    • Eli
      June 13, 2013 - 10:15

      That rant wouldn't exactly warrant a stroll with Rick Mercer. His rants are worth listening to. But to get back to your "David Day Report", enlighten (e-word) me as to who commissioned it. That's who would release it I'd think.

  • Eli
    June 05, 2013 - 18:52

    Thank YOU for the memories Mr. Day.