Premiers must call PM back to health-care table

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

By Mary Clarke

Summer’s here and the deepest thoughts most of us hope to have is what the weather will be like on the weekend.

It is not generally a time when significant moments in our politics and society are expected to occur. But provincial and territorial premiers from across Canada will gather in Niagara-on-the-Lake July 24-26 for the Council of the Federation meetings.

This gathering offers a window of opportunity to raise an issue vital to the lives of all Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.

This summer’s gathering of the premiers marks the final Council of the Federation meeting before 2014, when the National Health Accord expires. Penned in 2004, the 10-year health accord set priorities to improve access to health care and established a new funding formula.

The meetings do not include the federal government and Prime Minister Stephen Harper will not be in Niagara. What many Canadians do not realize is that there are no first ministers’ gatherings of all the premiers and the prime minister anymore. Harper refuses to attend them.

The 2004 health accord’s funding formula effectively reversed the cuts of the 1990s. It has helped to stabilize our health-care system, improve access and increase the federal share of health-care funding. But virtually all of the other initiatives set out by the first ministers in the accord have since been abandoned by the Harper Conservative government.

Wait times for diagnostic tests and some specific surgeries have been reduced. While the tracking and managing of wait times in several provinces has improved, there is still a long way to go.

Equally important, in 2004 the provinces, territories and federal government established a National Pharmaceutical Strategy. Finally, progress was promised toward a national drug coverage program that would actually cut overall drug costs through bulk buying and better co-ordination. The idea of a national pharmacare plan was championed by former premier Danny Williams. But since their election, the Harper Conservative government has refused to participate in the discussions, effectively killing the dream of national drug coverage and stalling progress on reducing drug prices for the better part of the last decade. The Harper government is also desperate to conclude Canada-European Union free trade negotiations that will undoubtedly increase drug prices because of extended patent protection for newly developed drugs.

In 2004, out of the health accord discussions, the provinces and federal government also began work to discuss home and continuing care. Progress on creating a national home- and continuing-care strategy is vital for more than a million Canadians who struggle with high out-of-pocket costs for post-hospital care. Just ask any family in N.L. dealing with caring for an elderly family member or a child with a chronic illness, or anyone with a chronic debilitating disease.

When the Canada Health Act was written, hospitals cared for the ill and nursing homes and home care cared for the frail.

This has changed. In all provinces, thousands of hospital beds have been closed since 1990, cutting our acute and chronic care hospital bed capacity. Patients with complex and heavy care needs are now discharged from hospitals into nursing homes and home care. As health care is changing, the commitment of Canadians to health care based on need not wealth remains strong. But our legislation has not kept up.

The Canada Health Act covers medically necessary hospital and physician services. When patients are moved out of hospital, they are no longer protected by single-tier public medicare. They are forced to pay for their own drugs. They face long waits, poor access, means testing and user fees for home care, rehabilitation and long-term care. Too often, these public services have been privatized to for-profit companies that maximize user fees in order to maximize their profit margins.

A national strategy to re-establish coverage for those services is crucial to ensure that when patients are moved out of hospital they are not moved out from under the umbrella of public health-care coverage. The Harper government has done nothing to expand the principles of medicare to cover home and continuing care.

In fact, the federal Conservative government’s antipathy to public medicare is becoming more and more overt.

Not only has it walked away from the table on a national drug program and home care, it has also bluntly refused to meet with the provincial governments about renewing the funding formula for health care.

Instead, the federal government plans to reduce funding from current projections by $36 billion in upcoming years, reversing the gains made in the health accord. In the latest budget, the government cut the Health Council of Canada as well as health services for veterans and refugees. The federal health minister has done nothing to implement the National Mental Health Strategy and has taken no action to uphold single-tier medicare in the face of private clinics extra-billing patients in provinces like British Columbia.

This summer, the health-care debate will heat up as health coalitions from across Canada are mobilizing thousands of Canadians to attend rallies and a shadow summit at the Council of the Federation meetings in Niagara-on-the-Lake.

If they allow the expiration of the health accord to go by without comment, the provincial and territorial premiers will be missing a key window of opportunity to take a stand for public medicare.

Canadians need to know what is at stake and the premiers have an occasion to spell it out.

The prime minister should get back to the table. Canadians of all political stripes support the core values of public medicare and expect strong federal leadership to uphold it.

Will Premier Kathy Dunderdale use the opportunity to take a stand for public Medicare? Will she and fellow premiers call the Harper government back to the intergovernmental table in order to work together for the necessary changes to ensure universal access to quality care for generations to come?

Mary Clarke is co-chair of the Health

Coalition of Newfoundland and Labdrador. She writes from St. John’s.

Organizations: European Union, Health Council of Canada

Geographic location: Canada, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Niagara N.L. British Columbia.This Niagara-on-the-Lake.If Newfoundland

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Aunt Lizzie
    July 21, 2013 - 22:58

    The delivery of health care is constitutionally the sole jurisdiction of the provinces. Yet, the Harper government is providing more health care funding to the provinces than any federal government in history, even taking inflation into account, and has committed to continued increases of 6% per year until 2017 and at least 3% per year after that. It's amazing that the provinces actually want the federal government to tell them how to spend their health care dollars. They should be grateful, both for the record levels of funding, and for the lack of strings attached. Perhaps the provinces are just trying to dodge accountability for the inefficiency of their own health care systems by pressuring the feds to make their health care spending decisions for them.